by Ian Royal » 11 Sep 2011 17:14
by urz13 » 11 Sep 2011 17:24
by Friday's Legacy » 11 Sep 2011 17:28
by rg6royal » 11 Sep 2011 17:38
by Ian Royal » 11 Sep 2011 17:42
Friday's Legacy bit light up front ian but i tend to agree with this line up.
by moonwalklikebas » 11 Sep 2011 17:47
by RoyalJames101 » 11 Sep 2011 17:51
by sandman » 11 Sep 2011 18:41
by andrew1957 » 11 Sep 2011 18:45
by grey_squirrel » 11 Sep 2011 18:58
Ian Royal TBH I think we need a change of shape more than anything, we're predictable and too easily over-run from midfield. It's also too easy to shut our attacks down by doubling up on wingers.
I'd like to see this please:
...............Federici
Shaun....Pearce..Gorkss....Mills
..........Jem........Howard
...............McAnuff
...Kebe.....................HRK
..............Le Fondre
McCarthy, Leigertwood, Manset, Hunt, Harte
by sandman » 11 Sep 2011 19:08
by Simon's Church » 11 Sep 2011 19:15
by paultheroyal » 11 Sep 2011 19:28
by Wycombe Royal » 11 Sep 2011 19:29
by Royals-lad14 » 11 Sep 2011 19:34
by Ian Royal » 11 Sep 2011 19:34
Wycombe Royal A message to all those sticking McAnuff in as the attacking midfielder. An attacking midfielder needs to be able to shoot. That counts out McAnuff.
by Friday's Legacy » 11 Sep 2011 19:37
paultheroyal Calling for Howard recall = real alarm bell relegation worries!
by Wycombe Royal » 11 Sep 2011 19:40
Friday's Legacypaultheroyal Calling for Howard recall = real alarm bell relegation worries!
nonsense. he's our only experienced creative player we can turn to.
by SCIAG » 11 Sep 2011 19:43
by grey_squirrel » 11 Sep 2011 19:46
Wycombe RoyalFriday's Legacypaultheroyal Calling for Howard recall = real alarm bell relegation worries!
nonsense. he's our only experienced creative player we can turn to.
Agreed.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 268 guests