by Royal Ginger » 01 Jan 2013 13:02
by eleventh earl of mar » 01 Jan 2013 13:37
Ian Royaleleventh earl of marIan Royal It really ain't hard to regularly get about half the PL results right and the odd scoreline bang on.
I guess you win a fair amount then?
I very rarely bet. And for it to be worth bothering you'd have to stake quite a lot each week over the 10 games for it to be really worth it.
by Z175 » 02 Jan 2013 09:51
Stuboo Lawro doesn't know his stuff
by NR_Royal » 09 Jan 2013 16:28
by Avon Royal » 09 Jan 2013 16:45
Z175 If you had bet on his Reading predicitions, you'd be a rich man!
by Ian Royal » 09 Jan 2013 17:22
eleventh earl of marIan Royaleleventh earl of mar
I guess you win a fair amount then?
I very rarely bet. And for it to be worth bothering you'd have to stake quite a lot each week over the 10 games for it to be really worth it.
Maybe you should bet more then as you said its not hard and so you should make a profit regardless of how much you stake.
by Z175 » 09 Jan 2013 17:37
Ian Royal it's not hard to get about half the PL results right and the odd scoreline bang on
by Simon's Church » 09 Jan 2013 17:39
by Royal91 » 10 Jan 2013 20:21
by creative_username_1 » 10 Jan 2013 21:57
NR_Royal
by RFCSPACE » 10 Jan 2013 22:09
creative_username_1NR_Royal
This is slightly misleading. He may have staked £2080 but he would only require a bank of £200 (+ variance) to return £208 in a year. 100% tax free returns would be fecking incredible
by creative_username_1 » 10 Jan 2013 22:12
RFCSPACEcreative_username_1NR_Royal
This is slightly misleading. He may have staked £2080 but he would only require a bank of £200 (+ variance) to return £208 in a year. 100% tax free returns would be fecking incredible
Requoting for the lolz
But even on the 2k, a return of over 8% is decent (and the risk is minimal given Lawro's insight)
by Z175 » 11 Jan 2013 10:18
by RFCSPACE » 11 Jan 2013 10:46
creative_username_1RFCSPACEcreative_username_1
This is slightly misleading. He may have staked £2080 but he would only require a bank of £200 (+ variance) to return £208 in a year. 100% tax free returns would be fecking incredible
Requoting for the lolz
But even on the 2k, a return of over 8% is decent (and the risk is minimal given Lawro's insight)
'greed about the lolz
but dont get this sentence But even on the 2k, a return of over 8% is decent (and the risk is minimal given Lawro's insight)
t
by AirRaidSiren » 12 Jan 2013 13:57
by creative_username_1 » 17 Jan 2013 21:55
by stickywhisky » 18 Jan 2013 09:47
by Silver Fox » 18 Jan 2013 10:20
Ian Royal Assuming you put money on all 10 results and ignored the actual scorelines, you'd have to get an average of odds of 2/1 just to break even with your half the results right.
by Extended-Phenotype » 18 Jan 2013 11:20
Silver FoxIan Royal Assuming you put money on all 10 results and ignored the actual scorelines, you'd have to get an average of odds of 2/1 just to break even with your half the results right.
Happy to be proved wrong* but you'd only need your 5 correct predictions to average evens (assuming level stake) to break even wouldn't you?
*although I'd always back myself against Ian's "knowledge"
by HoneyRoastHoax » 18 Jan 2013 11:24
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 351 guests