by cmonurz » 02 Sep 2012 17:09
by Ian Royal » 02 Sep 2012 17:18
cmonurz As I said, in my view, if we can't get that this is a squad game, we'll leave ourselves short. Maybe we'll get away with it - either the players will play out of their skins for a second season in a row, or we'll get lucky and have no real injuries. But 3 or 4 key players on the treatment table, and we are more fcuked than a cheap Vegas whore.
by RoyalBlue » 02 Sep 2012 17:34
Ian Royalcmonurz As I said, in my view, if we can't get that this is a squad game, we'll leave ourselves short. Maybe we'll get away with it - either the players will play out of their skins for a second season in a row, or we'll get lucky and have no real injuries. But 3 or 4 key players on the treatment table, and we are more fcuked than a cheap Vegas whore.
Obviously it's a squad game, but you don't smash a transfer record to buy a squad player. You smash it to buy a first team and improve your squad by the displaced first teamer being in it.
And I still don't see how Zaha is a definite significant improvement on HRK for the here and now. At least £4m worth of significant improvement.
And anyone who gets 3 or 4 key players on the treatment table is screwed the same.
by Cypry » 02 Sep 2012 20:46
LoyalRoyalFancmonurzCypry
So we NEED Zaha? Why? How many goals did he score last year (fewer than Church I believe)? How many assists (same as HRK)? How would he improve the team? Who are you going to drop to include him in the starting lineup (I assume if you're going to spend £6M on him then you'll expect him to start)?
Seems bizarre to me that a player who scored less than Church, and got the same number of assists as one of our current players in the same league, is suddenly this years MUST HAVE, particularly as most of those clamouring for us to buy him seem to think that neither Church or HRK are "up to" the Prmiership.....
Dear me, that's an atrocious post.
Why sign Zaha? Because he is a very exciting, direct, pacy, attacking midfielder with bags of potential, that's why.
+1
Zaha or Robson-Kanu?
by AthleticoSpizz » 02 Sep 2012 20:47
by melonhead » 03 Sep 2012 11:08
by ManchesterRoyals » 03 Sep 2012 11:29
by Hoop Blah » 03 Sep 2012 11:35
Ian Royalcmonurz As I said, in my view, if we can't get that this is a squad game, we'll leave ourselves short. Maybe we'll get away with it - either the players will play out of their skins for a second season in a row, or we'll get lucky and have no real injuries. But 3 or 4 key players on the treatment table, and we are more fcuked than a cheap Vegas whore.
Obviously it's a squad game, but you don't smash a transfer record to buy a squad player. You smash it to buy a first team and improve your squad by the displaced first teamer being in it.
And I still don't see how Zaha is a definite significant improvement on HRK for the here and now. At least £4m worth of significant improvement.
And anyone who gets 3 or 4 key players on the treatment table is screwed the same.
by Hoop Blah » 03 Sep 2012 11:40
LoyalRoyalFan Pogregbnyak and Le Fondre - Premier League standard by my reckoning, albeit two games so far.
Roberts - Good enough and obviously experienced at this level.
Hunt and Simon Church - Very debatable. Championship level strikers.
That's 3 good enough for this level then. Where's the fourth or fifth?
by blythspartan » 03 Sep 2012 11:57
by ManchesterRoyals » 03 Sep 2012 12:02
blythspartan I would rather have our strike force than Liverpool's
by moonwalklikebas » 03 Sep 2012 12:58
by Royal Bahamas » 03 Sep 2012 14:35
by Snowball » 03 Sep 2012 15:12
Hoop Blah
Le Fondre is a good finisher, but I've not seen anything from him yet to prove he'll be a consistent Premier League performer. His performance against Stoke looked like a player a bit out of his depth. I'm sure he'll improve and get used to having to be more clinical and make the most of opportunities that come his way but he needs to learn quickly.
by melonhead » 03 Sep 2012 15:24
by loyalroyal4life » 03 Sep 2012 15:31
by cmonurz » 03 Sep 2012 15:49
blythspartan I would rather have our strike force than Liverpool's
by E. Andrew » 03 Sep 2012 16:59
moonwalklikebas Our prayers were answered yesterday..... By Jay Tabb
by Ian Royal » 03 Sep 2012 17:35
Hoop BlahLoyalRoyalFan Pogregbnyak and Le Fondre - Premier League standard by my reckoning, albeit two games so far.
Roberts - Good enough and obviously experienced at this level.
Hunt and Simon Church - Very debatable. Championship level strikers.
That's 3 good enough for this level then. Where's the fourth or fifth?
Le Fondre is a good finisher, but I've not seen anything from him yet to prove he'll be a consistent Premier League performer. His performance against Stoke looked like a player a bit out of his depth. I'm sure he'll improve and get used to having to be more clinical and make the most of opportunities that come his way but he needs to learn quickly.
by Royal Bahamas » 03 Sep 2012 20:27
Ian RoyalHoop BlahLoyalRoyalFan Pogregbnyak and Le Fondre - Premier League standard by my reckoning, albeit two games so far.
Roberts - Good enough and obviously experienced at this level.
Hunt and Simon Church - Very debatable. Championship level strikers.
That's 3 good enough for this level then. Where's the fourth or fifth?
Le Fondre is a good finisher, but I've not seen anything from him yet to prove he'll be a consistent Premier League performer. His performance against Stoke looked like a player a bit out of his depth. I'm sure he'll improve and get used to having to be more clinical and make the most of opportunities that come his way but he needs to learn quickly.
To me, he looked a player who hadn't quite found his scoring boots. He then scored a penalty and got a hat-trick in the recent friendly. I reckon if he plays more games, we'll see more 'keeper troubling shots from him.
Users browsing this forum: tidus_mi2 and 434 guests