Confimred new owners of Raeding Footbal Club

8684 posts
jellytot
Member
Posts: 916
Joined: 16 Nov 2012 20:07

Re: Buyout

by jellytot » 01 Jun 2014 09:55

I wonder why Burman want a private chat with SJM? Maybe owning 49% is a good starting point. He can buy the other buggers out as and when.

paddy20
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1251
Joined: 18 Apr 2007 17:50
Location: Wokingham

Re: Buyout

by paddy20 » 01 Jun 2014 10:07

ZacNaloen don't believe for a second anton returned any shares to Madejski. He just resigned and redistributed his shares to Samuelson and Oblensky.

or these clauses re: MTI and then having jurisdiction. These rumoured demands are all just because they hold the most valuable part of the company.

This is what I think is going on

TSI is 51% of the ownership, therefore defacto these are the important shares. This is the sole reason they have control over the sale, theirs are the only shares that matter if your immediate aim is control of the club. Madejski will sell as well just because he doesn't want his wealth tied up in the club anymore.

I have doubts over the legality that anyone can hold any say over the shares Madejski holds in RFC Holdings that could stand up in court, it's a different entity.

Now comes seriously vague speculation (above is just speculation ;)), would Madejski consider selling his shares directly to Burman? Maybe this is what the rumoured meeting is about.

49% isn't 51% but it's a foot in the door & saves the club as there is nothing that says he can't put money into RFC Ltd and he can chip away at TSI. If he's what he says he is and he's in it for the sport is there any reason this could not happen? (I have no reason to doubt the guy, he has a good reputation but really who knows with these billionaires. They all seem to be sociopaths)


Cant see that happening. Billionaires, by their very own nature, tend to be control freaks. Cant see any reason, other than the TSI directors are looking for a payoff that TSI wouldn't want to sell. If the two Directors in question are on £20k pw for 2 years it means the buyers will need to put in another £1m to get rid of them. Couldn't see that being a major stumbling block. I think the more likely scenario is that the club are playing one off against the other( Sagi and Burman). This can be a risky strategy but with the past record of poor management at Reading can see it all going belly up because our directors think they are brighter than they really are!

User avatar
Royal Rother
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 21275
Joined: 13 Apr 2004 23:22
Location: The handsome bald fella with the blue eyes

Re: Buyout

by Royal Rother » 01 Jun 2014 10:13

What, after he's injected £50m, taken the club to the PL and increased the value of the shares despite having no ultimate control?

So many reasons why that would never happen.

User avatar
ZacNaloen
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 7239
Joined: 13 Oct 2008 13:34
Location: 'If atheism is a religion, then bald is a hair color.' -Mark Schnitzius

Re: Buyout

by ZacNaloen » 01 Jun 2014 11:02

I get that, I just don't see the point of meeting SJM unless he's considering it, he can't do anything about the TSI shares.

CholseyRoyal
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 538
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 07:37
Location: Cholsey, Oxon

Re: Buyout

by CholseyRoyal » 01 Jun 2014 11:24

ZacNaloen I get that, I just don't see the point of meeting SJM unless he's considering it, he can't do anything about the TSI shares.



I wonder if this may have something to do with it?

http://t.co/OsOTdSpRgK

Maybe Burman can't get the info he wants from MTI.

PS if the tweet shows up like mine in Safari, hit the back arrow not the Done button


Millsy
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 10054
Joined: 16 Jul 2004 18:36
Location: Running from The Left

Re: Buyout

by Millsy » 01 Jun 2014 11:48

What concerns me is the almost deafening silence by all parties regarding Gylfi's return.

Where does all this leave that deal?

We deserve to know. :evil:

User avatar
melonhead
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 14230
Joined: 30 Jul 2010 15:36
Location: on a thorn

Re: Buyout

by melonhead » 01 Jun 2014 14:07

Complicated business takeover in being complicated shocker

User avatar
Schards#2
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 4197
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 13:46
Location: Wildest Wiltshire

Re: Buyout

by Schards#2 » 02 Jun 2014 09:42

As Royal Rother says, no one is going to pay decent money for a 49% share when someone else owns the other 51% in its entirety. You have as much control as if you held 1%.

My best guess would be that the meeting with SJM is to discuss who would be responsible for the costs involved in buying out the contracts of the two leeches representing TSI. £40k pm for for two uears equates to a £960k lump sum which, in the overall scheme of things isn't huge. I would hope a deal could be struck even if it sticks in the throat.

tee peg
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1800
Joined: 27 Sep 2005 13:05
Location: gloucester

Re: Buyout

by tee peg » 02 Jun 2014 10:13

leon basically, we're f ucked


not according to a text alert just sent out from the club.........


User avatar
HoneyRoastHoax
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1228
Joined: 07 Mar 2012 09:22

Re: Buyout

by HoneyRoastHoax » 02 Jun 2014 10:13

TBF to Shards he's got it right if the rumours are true.

If the two directors aren't willing to simply step down, which is actually fair enough, they are entitled to ask for a payout.

All we know is titbits which journalists have fed us so it should all be taken with a massive pinch of salt. For all we know TSI may be working really hard to get us the best deal from the best buyer.

tee peg
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1800
Joined: 27 Sep 2005 13:05
Location: gloucester

Re: Buyout

by tee peg » 02 Jun 2014 10:15

blueroyals AO and CS have earned their wage IMO. We've had 4 or 5 potential buyers this year that they've found. I'm willing to bet that in the entire 20 years pre-Anton SJM had less interest than what we've had in the last 6 months.

They're using their global contacts to find potential buyers.


They have resigned according to the club....

User avatar
HoneyRoastHoax
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1228
Joined: 07 Mar 2012 09:22

Re: Buyout

by HoneyRoastHoax » 02 Jun 2014 10:16

As Chairman, I would like to confirm that we have the necessary funding in place to safely take the club forward.

Together, we continue to look for new ownership of the Club and, as the wealth of speculation can attest, there has been plenty of interest but no firm offers.

However, it is imperative that there is no rush to judgement and that we take the necessary time in choosing the right person for the future of Reading Football Club.

While there is no takeover with any new investors, the process is ongoing. I would like to take this opportunity to assure our fans that the club is secure going forward.

The club can announce that Directors Anton Zingarevich, Christopher Samuelson and Andrew Obolensky have left the board.

I would also like to thank our supporters for their trust and patience during this period and their loyalty in renewing their season tickets for the 2014-15 season.

During my 24-year tenure as Chairman, I have always tried to be as open as possible with our fans - the lifeblood of this club - and as always we will continue to keep our supporters fully informed at every turn.

However, I am sure everyone can appreciate that it would not be appropriate for me or anyone at the club to comment any further on matters regarding potential ownership and investment at this point in time.

tee peg
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1800
Joined: 27 Sep 2005 13:05
Location: gloucester

Re: Buyout

by tee peg » 02 Jun 2014 10:19

A step in the right direction.


Royalwaster
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3605
Joined: 13 Jul 2004 13:32

Re: Buyout

by Royalwaster » 02 Jun 2014 10:20

HoneyRoastHoax As Chairman, I would like to confirm that we have the necessary funding in place to safely take the club forward.

Together, we continue to look for new ownership of the Club and, as the wealth of speculation can attest, there has been plenty of interest but no firm offers.

However, it is imperative that there is no rush to judgement and that we take the necessary time in choosing the right person for the future of Reading Football Club.

While there is no takeover with any new investors, the process is ongoing. I would like to take this opportunity to assure our fans that the club is secure going forward.

The club can announce that Directors Anton Zingarevich, Christopher Samuelson and Andrew Obolensky have left the board.

I would also like to thank our supporters for their trust and patience during this period and their loyalty in renewing their season tickets for the 2014-15 season.

During my 24-year tenure as Chairman, I have always tried to be as open as possible with our fans - the lifeblood of this club - and as always we will continue to keep our supporters fully informed at every turn.

However, I am sure everyone can appreciate that it would not be appropriate for me or anyone at the club to comment any further on matters regarding potential ownership and investment at this point in time.


LOL thought you'd invented that, as the bit about AZ, CS and AO leaving the board seemed too good to be true. But it's also on the OS so must be true. Interesting.

User avatar
The Rouge
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2560
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 16:51
Location: Giving it the Double Djokovic

Re: Buyout

by The Rouge » 02 Jun 2014 10:20

Honey Roast Hoax - you are John Madejski AICMFP

User avatar
Extended-Phenotype
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5887
Joined: 27 May 2011 10:43
Location: Oxford Road

Re: Buyout

by Extended-Phenotype » 02 Jun 2014 10:20

Holding a 51% majority of the shares does not necessarily give you meaningfully more control of the company.

Minority shareholders usually receive protection from majority shareholder actions that are counter to the minority's interest and most decisions are made by the board of which the majority shareholder has equal footing to any other board member.

At least, that's my recollection of the ole 49-51 shenanigans.

User avatar
Angry Shed Sex
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1018
Joined: 12 Jun 2013 12:48

Re: Buyout

by Angry Shed Sex » 02 Jun 2014 10:22

Does that mean the neither Christopher Samuelson or Andrew Obolensky have the power to dictate extended gravy for themselves? It doesn't really make that clear. I'm presuming they are still getting paid.

User avatar
Royal Lady
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 13760
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 10:17
Location: Don't mess with "my sort". Cheers then.

Re: Buyout

by Royal Lady » 02 Jun 2014 10:24

Twitter says AZ, CS and AO have left the board! Yay!!!!!

User avatar
melonhead
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 14230
Joined: 30 Jul 2010 15:36
Location: on a thorn

Re: Buyout

by melonhead » 02 Jun 2014 10:24

cant take a directors salary if you arent a director.
but yeah, all/most/some of that conract will probably have been paid up to get em out- which ammounts to the same thing

User avatar
HoneyRoastHoax
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1228
Joined: 07 Mar 2012 09:22

Re: Buyout

by HoneyRoastHoax » 02 Jun 2014 10:24

The Rouge Honey Roast Hoax - you are John Madejski AICMFP


Yeah, realised should have done the old bunny rabbit ears on that one.

Shows the ITK merchants are just puppets of journo's who stir up the weak to sell papers

8684 posts

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ankeny, Hendo, royal67 and 430 guests

It is currently 19 Apr 2024 17:18