RoyallyFcukedRoyal Ginger Pogrebnyak's a quality player, so the point is worthless.
The Pogrebnyak DeLOLusion
How we could do with him now.
RoyallyFcukedRoyal Ginger Pogrebnyak's a quality player, so the point is worthless.
The Pogrebnyak DeLOLusion
by AthleticoSpizz » 06 Jan 2018 23:26
by 72 bus » 07 Jan 2018 07:02
double d About 1 in 4. 24 in 94 games..... not too shabby. Better then 0 in 20 like our strikers this season. Definitely better then what Dadi, Aluko and Barrow would do
by Jagermesiter1871 » 07 Jan 2018 09:03
72 busdouble d About 1 in 4. 24 in 94 games..... not too shabby. Better then 0 in 20 like our strikers this season. Definitely better then what Dadi, Aluko and Barrow would do
You know it's getting bad when folk suggest that Pogrebnyak would improve things
by Snowflake Royal » 07 Jan 2018 10:05
double d About 1 in 4. 24 in 94 games..... not too shabby. Better then 0 in 20 like our strikers this season. Definitely better then what Dadi, Aluko and Barrow would do
Snowflake Royaldouble d About 1 in 4. 24 in 94 games..... not too shabby. Better then 0 in 20 like our strikers this season. Definitely better then what Dadi, Aluko and Barrow would do
Try that again.
Between them our strikers have 4 in 15 starts (or 4 in 31 appearances) Dadi has 1 in 2 starts or 1 in 6 appearances mostly made up from cameos when the game is long lost.
And Pog was costing us more than both Kermie and Dadi combined.
Barrow has 7 in 19 (+4).
Have a think before typing will you.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 510 guests