CONFIMRED - Joseph Mendes

User avatar
NewCorkSeth
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 9519
Joined: 05 Jul 2013 00:17
Location: Wherever Nameless may be.

Re: CONFIMRED - Joseph Mendes

by NewCorkSeth » 14 Jul 2016 13:38

Brosef Stalin
NewCorkSeth
andrew1957
Is 375K a guess as no fee has been reported anywhere as far as I can see?

uh-oh.. The jigs up!


Ban this racist filth

:oops: :oops: :oops:

Caught out again.

User avatar
Ian Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 35156
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 13:43
Location: Playing spot the pc*nt on HNA?

Re: CONFIMRED - Joseph Mendes

by Ian Royal » 19 Jul 2016 18:54

Was Mendes number 11 in the Al-Taawoun friendly? Because whoever it was looked a bit bobbins.

Samuel 15?

User avatar
TFF
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5321
Joined: 20 Jan 2006 09:17
Location: Running to the hills

Re: CONFIMRED - Joseph Mendes

by TFF » 19 Jul 2016 23:35

Played up top tonight and looked a proper handful.

Made some nice runs which weren't picked out.

Royality creeps In
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1080
Joined: 18 May 2014 19:35

Re: CONFIMRED - Joseph Mendes

by Royality creeps In » 20 Jul 2016 06:21

From what I saw last night I dont think Kermogant will be worrying about losing his place

User avatar
Ian Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 35156
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 13:43
Location: Playing spot the pc*nt on HNA?

Re: CONFIMRED - Joseph Mendes

by Ian Royal » 20 Jul 2016 12:56

Jolly good. A 50/50 split on whether he's good/shit. :lol:


User avatar
Royal With Cheese
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5700
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 07:45
Location: location location

Re: CONFIMRED - Joseph Mendes

by Royal With Cheese » 20 Jul 2016 13:03

I'll give him a fair crack of the whip.

If he hasn't scored a hat-trick within 20 minutes of his Championship debut I will naturally review the situation and boo mercilessly for his entire remaining Reading career.

User avatar
TFF
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5321
Joined: 20 Jan 2006 09:17
Location: Running to the hills

Re: CONFIMRED - Joseph Mendes

by TFF » 20 Jul 2016 13:58

Ian Royal Jolly good. A 50/50 split on whether he's good/shit. :lol:


LOL - jury's definitely out for me. Like I say he looks a handful for defenders to deal with but he'll need to be more than strong. We didn't see him for long enough nor with the ball enough.

We looked weaker once he went off but there were too many other changes going on to say that was down to him not being on the pitch.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 371 guests

It is currently 24 Apr 2024 03:50