by winchester_royal » 24 Jul 2016 12:48
by tmesis » 24 Jul 2016 12:56
winchester_royal Not the end of the world by any means, but I do think it highlights our need for a proper striker and better options in defence.
by winchester_royal » 24 Jul 2016 13:06
tmesiswinchester_royal Not the end of the world by any means, but I do think it highlights our need for a proper striker and better options in defence.
Unless this striker is going to create all of his own chances, I'd have thought the problem is more about creativity. Few strikers would do well with the service they get currently.
By the way, did anyone else having trouble with traffic?
I know of one fan who only got there shortly before half time, only to find he couldn't get in, so he went home.
by Lower West » 24 Jul 2016 13:09
by Lower West » 24 Jul 2016 13:13
tmesis By the way, did anyone else having trouble with traffic?
I know of one fan who only got there shortly before half time, only to find he couldn't get in, so he went home.
by sandman » 24 Jul 2016 13:45
Lower West Positives - Stam saw first hand what we endured towards the end of last season. Of far more use than an easy win against a lower league team. The team to be drilled to be focused from the kick off. The (starting) formation didn't work very well yesterday. Plenty of possession but little movement up front to open up the Dons. For those that are complaining about the possession at the back. In European teams every player is comfortable on the ball.
As for the new players. Mendes was too isolated. Swift was wasted on the left. Far more effective when more central. As for Joey VDB , if he's a defensive midfielder then the position on the pitch did little to influence the game.
Expect to see a different team formation next week.
Negatives - shows that changing the manager doesn't get you any further forward.
by Lower West » 24 Jul 2016 14:11
sandmanLower West Positives - Stam saw first hand what we endured towards the end of last season. Of far more use than an easy win against a lower league team. The team to be drilled to be focused from the kick off. The (starting) formation didn't work very well yesterday. Plenty of possession but little movement up front to open up the Dons. For those that are complaining about the possession at the back. In European teams every player is comfortable on the ball.
As for the new players. Mendes was too isolated. Swift was wasted on the left. Far more effective when more central. As for Joey VDB , if he's a defensive midfielder then the position on the pitch did little to influence the game.
Expect to see a different team formation next week.
Negatives - shows that changing the manager doesn't get you any further forward.
What about Championship teams? There is a difference between being comfortable on the ball and there is unnecessary risks around your own box because you're trying to impersonate Real Madrid.
Possession is fine, possession without purpose is not.
by sandman » 24 Jul 2016 14:16
by Ian Royal » 24 Jul 2016 15:31
sandman Didn't suggest it wasn't. Point still stands though and we've had this situation before under Adkins and Rodgers where we're trying to play like other clubs instead of concentrating on our own strengths.
by Rea Ding » 24 Jul 2016 18:11
Ian Royalsandman Didn't suggest it wasn't. Point still stands though and we've had this situation before under Adkins and Rodgers where we're trying to play like other clubs instead of concentrating on our own strengths.
Playing possession football badly does not mean you should stop trying to play possession football. The problems with the possession football was a lack of willingness to be positive and take the initiative / responsibility. You can play a more direct style, but that doesn't make those problems go away. It just results in hopeful punts up field and hopeful crosses that result mainly in a turnover of possession and an opposition attack.
Success in football is about having the confidence to take responsibility and try to make something specific happen. Usually with a change in pace or direction to catch the opposition by surprise. Whether that's through keeping possession with short passes or going forward quickly doesn't really matter. Our recent problems have consistently been that we're slow, uncertain and predictable. Whether we play direct or possession based.
by Ian Royal » 24 Jul 2016 19:17
Rea DingIan Royalsandman Didn't suggest it wasn't. Point still stands though and we've had this situation before under Adkins and Rodgers where we're trying to play like other clubs instead of concentrating on our own strengths.
Playing possession football badly does not mean you should stop trying to play possession football. The problems with the possession football was a lack of willingness to be positive and take the initiative / responsibility. You can play a more direct style, but that doesn't make those problems go away. It just results in hopeful punts up field and hopeful crosses that result mainly in a turnover of possession and an opposition attack.
Success in football is about having the confidence to take responsibility and try to make something specific happen. Usually with a change in pace or direction to catch the opposition by surprise. Whether that's through keeping possession with short passes or going forward quickly doesn't really matter. Our recent problems have consistently been that we're slow, uncertain and predictable. Whether we play direct or possession based.
Ian did you actually go to the game, it was pretty terrible and shit football
by Lower West » 24 Jul 2016 21:11
sandman Didn't suggest it wasn't. Point still stands though and we've had this situation before under Adkins and Rodgers where we're trying to play like other clubs instead of concentrating on our own strengths.
by 3points » 24 Jul 2016 22:15
by Steve_Upper_West » 24 Jul 2016 22:33
by Extended-Phenotype » 24 Jul 2016 22:34
Ian Royalsandman Didn't suggest it wasn't. Point still stands though and we've had this situation before under Adkins and Rodgers where we're trying to play like other clubs instead of concentrating on our own strengths.
Playing possession football badly does not mean you should stop trying to play possession football.
by Ian Royal » 24 Jul 2016 22:39
Extended-PhenotypeIan Royalsandman Didn't suggest it wasn't. Point still stands though and we've had this situation before under Adkins and Rodgers where we're trying to play like other clubs instead of concentrating on our own strengths.
Playing possession football badly does not mean you should stop trying to play possession football.
Er, yes it does. Especially if you've been doing it badly for a number of years.
Take the fcuking hint. Move on.
by Extended-Phenotype » 24 Jul 2016 22:46
by North Somerset Royal » 24 Jul 2016 22:58
Lower Westtmesis By the way, did anyone else having trouble with traffic?
I know of one fan who only got there shortly before half time, only to find he couldn't get in, so he went home.
Did he use Satnav. Traffic was avoidable.
by Ian Royal » 24 Jul 2016 23:56
Extended-Phenotype A club that can't compete in the transfer market should be playing to the strengths of the players, the manager adapting the style to them, not the players adapting to the style of the managers.
There is a reason a team with Readings budget has performed better with a faster, more direct, counter-attacking style over the years, compared to the inconsistent, mistake-laden rubbish we've had when successive managers insist on forcing the "in" tactic on a team of incapable players.
by genome » 25 Jul 2016 07:38
Users browsing this forum: Snowball and 506 guests