SCIAGpaultheroyal With our top youngest going to the likes of Plymouth and Boreham Wood, it's not a case of them being frozen out but more that they are clearly not good enough at this level.
You can't judge a player based on where they go on loan. You need to judge it based on watching them play.
Kuhl and Tanner are better players than Tshibola, who went to Hartlepool when he was good enough to be starting for us, came back without having improved much, went into the team and got sold for £5m. There's every reason to think that they'd succeed if we played them, particularly given that they've both looked more than capable when they've played.
To be honest those two have really been harmed by their loans so far, we'd have been much better off keeping them at Reading and giving them minutes than sending them out to watch the ball fly over their heads.
Kuhl didn't do enough at Dundee, Tanner rarely started for Plymouth mostly from the bench. If they were as good as you obviously think there are they would have been other clubs wanting them on loan but does not seem the case. If I remember rightly a club has to be interested in you before you can go out on loan it's not The clubs fault it didn't
Work out for them. If you cant shine in lower leagues then what's the point of thinking it will work at a higher level. As for them being better than Tishbola, you must know more than Villa And Reading and the other half a dozen clubs who inquired about him.