Rival Watch

17149 posts
User avatar
Snowflake Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 39402
Joined: 20 Jun 2017 17:51

Re: Rival Watch

by Snowflake Royal » 22 May 2023 11:43

YorkshireRoyal99
Snowflake Royal
tidus_mi2 Yep, real shame really that Madejski at the point he did sell was so desperate for the sale he got conned by AZ, ended up losing more money by essentially bailing us out and taking control again when it was found AZ actually had no money.

So I'll be forever grateful he had the foresight to put the clause in the deal that ownership would default back to him should AZ fail to buy the remaining % of the club or I feel we definitely would have gone into administration.

Yep. And the Thais weren't really asset strippers. They selarated out a relatively unimportant piece of land where development would benefit the club. And bailed us out of issues with Vibrac and HMRC when Madejski couldn’t.

It's Yongge that's the asset stripper. Sold the old training ground, new training ground and stadium out from the club's control, to perpetuate his apalling overspending and stave off the FL a couple of extra seasons


Wasn't the debacle around selling it to himself though? Is it not the club who now own the training ground? I don't think he's stripped the club of assets aside from the stadium, but I think it was all a plan to increase revenue to help bypass FFP for as long as possible.

He sold the new training ground and the stadium to himself.

under the tin
Member
Posts: 963
Joined: 15 Jan 2010 09:21

Re: Rival Watch

by under the tin » 22 May 2023 11:59

tidus_mi2 Man, so frustrating to see Brighton secure a top 6 position, basically where we were in 2007, that for me was one of the only mistakes Coppell made, massively playing down European football.


Whoa!
I can recall an item from a few years ago, stating that Brighton's owner had (then) put about a quarter of a billion £ into the club.
Not Citeh levels, but for a provincial club, very substantial.

User avatar
Silver Fox
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 25702
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 10:02
Location: From the Andes to the indies in my undies

Re: Rival Watch

by Silver Fox » 22 May 2023 12:29

Snowflake Royal
YorkshireRoyal99
Snowflake Royal Yep. And the Thais weren't really asset strippers. They selarated out a relatively unimportant piece of land where development would benefit the club. And bailed us out of issues with Vibrac and HMRC when Madejski couldn’t.

It's Yongge that's the asset stripper. Sold the old training ground, new training ground and stadium out from the club's control, to perpetuate his apalling overspending and stave off the FL a couple of extra seasons


Wasn't the debacle around selling it to himself though? Is it not the club who now own the training ground? I don't think he's stripped the club of assets aside from the stadium, but I think it was all a plan to increase revenue to help bypass FFP for as long as possible.

He sold the new training ground and the stadium to himself.


So not an asset stripper then

YorkshireRoyal99
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5005
Joined: 10 Aug 2017 18:07

Re: Rival Watch

by YorkshireRoyal99 » 22 May 2023 12:36

Snowflake Royal
YorkshireRoyal99
Snowflake Royal Yep. And the Thais weren't really asset strippers. They selarated out a relatively unimportant piece of land where development would benefit the club. And bailed us out of issues with Vibrac and HMRC when Madejski couldn’t.

It's Yongge that's the asset stripper. Sold the old training ground, new training ground and stadium out from the club's control, to perpetuate his apalling overspending and stave off the FL a couple of extra seasons


Wasn't the debacle around selling it to himself though? Is it not the club who now own the training ground? I don't think he's stripped the club of assets aside from the stadium, but I think it was all a plan to increase revenue to help bypass FFP for as long as possible.

He sold the new training ground and the stadium to himself.


He sold the training ground to RFC Bearwood Limited, which is a subsidiary of The Reading Football Club Limited. I think he just sold it from one part of the club to the other.

Clyde1998
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1600
Joined: 04 Mar 2010 16:27

Re: Rival Watch

by Clyde1998 » 22 May 2023 13:41

Elm Park Kid No one knows if surviving an extra season would have made any difference in the long-run. I think that the late 00s was already a bit too late for Reading to establish itself as a permanent PL club without a billionaire bankrolling us. You need that additional revenue that comes from a widespread support at home and abroad - I feel like Reading was already fighting an extremely difficult battle back then to get the attention of the younger generations. Yes, you've got other clubs that were our size now in the PL - but most of them have had a lot of additional cash ploughed into them.

Big John did what he could. He wasn't going to put his personal finances at risk in order to gamble on the club. We've seen the painful consequences of owners trying to do that. He tried to sell the club to someone he thought could spend what he couldn't - he messed up - it is what it is.

I think we could've established ourselves if we'd stayed up in that second season. I think Wigan are a good comparison - just about stayed up in their second season and were only relegated in their eighth season (albeit they were in a relegation battle most years). Wigan are are surrounded by much bigger clubs and rugby league is the biggest sport in the city. We probably have/had more potential to grow into an established Premier League club than Wigan because of these factors.

Stoke spent ten seasons in the Premier League (being mid-table for all but their final season); Swansea had seven seasons (mid-table for all but their final two seasons). I can't remember what either sides' financial backing was at the time though.

I believe a third season would've made a big impact for us: we might've gone ahead with the stadium expansion and I think we'd've had more incentive to make some serious transfers due to the relative lack of spending in the previous couple of seasons. I seem to recall we had John Mensah (I think) lined up to sign if we'd stayed up that season - who would've been a huge upgrade on our defence at the time.

If you look at the side that started at Derby on the final day of that season - Hahnemann; Murty, Ingimarsson, Duberry, Shorey; Oster, Matejovsky, Harper, Hunt; Lita, Kitson - there are only two players there who didn't play in the 106 season and the two wingers were second choice that season (Hunt did improve a lot in the Premier League though). You have to get to the tenth most used player to find someone not at the club during the 106 season (Bikey) and he played less than 40% of minutes.

I think the club had realised before the end of that season we needed to strengthen if we wanted to remain in the Premier League for a prolonged period. The problem was we narrowly got relegated after a decline in form towards the end of the season and we couldn't make it back the following season - killing the chance of establishing ourselves at that level.


Stranded
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 19587
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 12:42
Location: Propping up the bar in the Nags

Re: Rival Watch

by Stranded » 22 May 2023 13:45

YorkshireRoyal99
Snowflake Royal
YorkshireRoyal99
Wasn't the debacle around selling it to himself though? Is it not the club who now own the training ground? I don't think he's stripped the club of assets aside from the stadium, but I think it was all a plan to increase revenue to help bypass FFP for as long as possible.

He sold the new training ground and the stadium to himself.


He sold the training ground to RFC Bearwood Limited, which is a subsidiary of The Reading Football Club Limited. I think he just sold it from one part of the club to the other.


Not sure on the accounting mechanics but the above is as stated in the accounts. The training ground, or at least the company that owns the training ground, is fully owned by the football club.

Mr Angry
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5782
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 16:05
Location: South Oxfordshire

Re: Rival Watch

by Mr Angry » 22 May 2023 13:45

How good a player was Matejovsky!

User avatar
Dirk Gently
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 10779
Joined: 08 Sep 2005 13:54

Re: Rival Watch

by Dirk Gently » 22 May 2023 14:05

Mr Angry How good a player was Matejovsky!


Brilliant, as long as you didn't need anyone to do any defending or tacking. If you did he was a liability.

User avatar
Snowflake Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 39402
Joined: 20 Jun 2017 17:51

Re: Rival Watch

by Snowflake Royal » 22 May 2023 16:02

Silver Fox
Snowflake Royal
YorkshireRoyal99
Wasn't the debacle around selling it to himself though? Is it not the club who now own the training ground? I don't think he's stripped the club of assets aside from the stadium, but I think it was all a plan to increase revenue to help bypass FFP for as long as possible.

He sold the new training ground and the stadium to himself.


So not an asset stripper then

He has stripped the assets from the club into separate entities he owns.

Owner =/= club

Although that may not be definitively the case with the training ground it seems.


User avatar
From Despair To Where?
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 22959
Joined: 19 Apr 2004 08:37
Location: See me in m'pants and ting

Re: Rival Watch

by From Despair To Where? » 22 May 2023 16:45

Dirk Gently
Mr Angry How good a player was Matejovsky!


Brilliant, as long as you didn't need anyone to do any defending or tacking. If you did he was a liability.


Still playing in the Czech top flight at 41.

AthleticoSpizz
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 23971
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 19:49
Location: A Hicks Hoof from Coley Park

Re: Rival Watch

by AthleticoSpizz » 22 May 2023 17:22

Mr Angry How good a player was Matejovsky!
overrated, or did we expect too much from him…..or both?

Wasn't a fan tbh

Clyde1998
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1600
Joined: 04 Mar 2010 16:27

Re: Rival Watch

by Clyde1998 » 22 May 2023 21:01

Mr Angry How good a player was Matejovsky!

He was arguably the best technical player the club's ever had. Matejovsky's biggest problems here were the players around him weren't on the same wavelength and I don't think he really worked in a two-man midfield.

User avatar
genome
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 25180
Joined: 08 Jul 2012 13:29
Location: Universe

Re: Rival Watch

by genome » 22 May 2023 21:23

I was waiting for the "not on the same wavelength" post and I've not been disappointed


Clyde1998
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1600
Joined: 04 Mar 2010 16:27

Re: Rival Watch

by Clyde1998 » 22 May 2023 21:56

genome I was waiting for the "not on the same wavelength" post and I've not been disappointed

Happy to oblige! :D

User avatar
Dirk Gently
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 10779
Joined: 08 Sep 2005 13:54

Re: Rival Watch

by Dirk Gently » 22 May 2023 21:58

We tried to bring a flair player, who played in a different way to the rest of the team's style, into a very tight-knit set of players whose main strength was their togetherness and understanding of each other.

That player's style of play was not suited to a defensive midfield role, and he was played in a team was frequently under the cosh and fighting a relegation battle where they all had to graft to survive.

We failed; he failed in what we needed him to do for us; we were relegated.

I still utterly believe that a less talented but much more pragmatic defensive midfielder who fitted much better into the team would have kept us up.

User avatar
From Despair To Where?
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 22959
Joined: 19 Apr 2004 08:37
Location: See me in m'pants and ting

Re: Rival Watch

by From Despair To Where? » 22 May 2023 22:06

I was going to say "Great player but not what we needed"

blythspartan
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2238
Joined: 05 Jun 2012 20:50

Re: Rival Watch

by blythspartan » 22 May 2023 22:28

From Despair To Where? I was going to say "Great player but not what we needed"


If only Scott Brown had chosen us over Celtic.

User avatar
Snowflake Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 39402
Joined: 20 Jun 2017 17:51

Re: Rival Watch

by Snowflake Royal » 22 May 2023 23:05

Clyde1998
Mr Angry How good a player was Matejovsky!

He was arguably the best technical player the club's ever had. Matejovsky's biggest problems here were the players around him weren't on the same wavelength and I don't think he really worked in a two-man midfield.

Like buggery was he.

Gylfi is a far superior player and technician. Ejaria is technically better. As was Little.

If you can't adapt your game to the players around you, you're hardly very technical. Playing passes your team mates can't read is not a sign of a good player.

User avatar
Sutekh
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 18386
Joined: 12 Feb 2014 14:05
Location: Undiscovered pyramid somewhere in Egypt

Re: Rival Watch

by Sutekh » 23 May 2023 06:33

Clyde1998
Elm Park Kid No one knows if surviving an extra season would have made any difference in the long-run. I think that the late 00s was already a bit too late for Reading to establish itself as a permanent PL club without a billionaire bankrolling us. You need that additional revenue that comes from a widespread support at home and abroad - I feel like Reading was already fighting an extremely difficult battle back then to get the attention of the younger generations. Yes, you've got other clubs that were our size now in the PL - but most of them have had a lot of additional cash ploughed into them.

Big John did what he could. He wasn't going to put his personal finances at risk in order to gamble on the club. We've seen the painful consequences of owners trying to do that. He tried to sell the club to someone he thought could spend what he couldn't - he messed up - it is what it is.

I think we could've established ourselves if we'd stayed up in that second season. I think Wigan are a good comparison - just about stayed up in their second season and were only relegated in their eighth season (albeit they were in a relegation battle most years). Wigan are are surrounded by much bigger clubs and rugby league is the biggest sport in the city. We probably have/had more potential to grow into an established Premier League club than Wigan because of these factors.

Stoke spent ten seasons in the Premier League (being mid-table for all but their final season); Swansea had seven seasons (mid-table for all but their final two seasons). I can't remember what either sides' financial backing was at the time though.

I believe a third season would've made a big impact for us: we might've gone ahead with the stadium expansion and I think we'd've had more incentive to make some serious transfers due to the relative lack of spending in the previous couple of seasons. I seem to recall we had John Mensah (I think) lined up to sign if we'd stayed up that season - who would've been a huge upgrade on our defence at the time.

If you look at the side that started at Derby on the final day of that season - Hahnemann; Murty, Ingimarsson, Duberry, Shorey; Oster, Matejovsky, Harper, Hunt; Lita, Kitson - there are only two players there who didn't play in the 106 season and the two wingers were second choice that season (Hunt did improve a lot in the Premier League though). You have to get to the tenth most used player to find someone not at the club during the 106 season (Bikey) and he played less than 40% of minutes.

I think the club had realised before the end of that season we needed to strengthen if we wanted to remain in the Premier League for a prolonged period. The problem was we narrowly got relegated after a decline in form towards the end of the season and we couldn't make it back the following season - killing the chance of establishing ourselves at that level.


The most annoying thing about that season was letting Fulham do the double over us, both by two goal margins and conceding very late in both games. Keeping both defeats to just a 1 goal margin would have kept Reading up! Also if SC had known that a 7-0 win at Derby would have done it anyway, Reading may well still have managed it as Derby were truly the worst PL side ever that year.

User avatar
Sutekh
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 18386
Joined: 12 Feb 2014 14:05
Location: Undiscovered pyramid somewhere in Egypt

Re: Rival Watch

by Sutekh » 23 May 2023 06:37

Dirk Gently We tried to bring a flair player, who played in a different way to the rest of the team's style, into a very tight-knit set of players whose main strength was their togetherness and understanding of each other.

That player's style of play was not suited to a defensive midfield role, and he was played in a team was frequently under the cosh and fighting a relegation battle where they all had to graft to survive.

We failed; he failed in what we needed him to do for us; we were relegated.

I still utterly believe that a less talented but much more pragmatic defensive midfielder who fitted much better into the team would have kept us up.


At the end of the day they just weren't all on the same wavelength, too many had become tuned to BBC Berks.

17149 posts

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 443 guests

It is currently 29 Mar 2024 06:38