VisionHoundYorkshireRoyal99
Not really because you're just forming an opinion. You might say that, I might say differently, that's why this exists.
The point wasn't to do with who was/wasn't in charge, it was actually the opposite. It wouldn't have mattered who it was, be it Pauno, Ince or whoever else, we would have stayed up because we were better than 3 teams.
Not sure Pauno can get much credit for that peterboro effort. We were absolutely absymal and should have lost to a team who hadn’t won for 20 games or something like that
We got a battling 0-0 draw in appalling conditions against relegation rivals in what was a must win game for them really. It's exactly the type of performance/result/attitude that you need to avoid relegation and which I wasn't sure we had in us under Pauno to be honest. It stopped the run of defeats and was the main factor (imo) in going away to Preston (who'd only lost once in their previous 11) , scoring 3 and hanging on to the win there.
Add in the fact we had Joao , who we know Pauno can get a tune out of, and to a lesser degree Meite (who Ince seemed to have an issue with early on ) returning to match fitness and I don't think it's that much of a stretch to suggest we might just have had enough to stay up.
We'll never know of course and ultimately even if he'd have lasted the season there wasn't any future for Pauno here.
We didn’t battle hard in that one at all. We were desperately passive and if peterboro could have finished would have lost comfortably. They had 9 shots on target and dominated the game. It was a poor performance against a poor side
Actually had a half decent side on paper then - certainly looks stronger than what we had our at the weekend