by TVPRoyal » 09 Aug 2006 20:05
by wallyroyal » 09 Aug 2006 21:46
by reading98 » 09 Aug 2006 21:49
wallyroyal £10million debts. how the hell does he know that.
by Einstein agogo » 09 Aug 2006 22:16
reading98wallyroyal £10million debts. how the hell does he know that.
Well the chairman has always been open about our finaces which are solid but we have always run at a lose cause we never got near the crowds we needed so it adds up, doesn't it really.
10 million is basically a profit compard to other clubs.
by Ian Royal » 10 Aug 2006 01:39
by rabidbee » 10 Aug 2006 03:13
by HighburyRoyale » 10 Aug 2006 09:47
by Arthur Pint » 10 Aug 2006 10:54
by HighburyRoyale » 10 Aug 2006 11:58
by Arthur Pint » 10 Aug 2006 12:09
by Einstein agogo » 10 Aug 2006 14:09
Arthur Pint Of course they will make the comparison with the previous champions, it's lazy journalism at it's best. It's the same as because both West Ham and Wigan did well in the Prem last season and spent around the £8 million mark, suddenly all the papers and websites start saying that if promoted teams spend this sort of money they should stay up.
It would be nice if we could stay up without spending that sort of money and prove that good coaching is just as effective as spending large amounts of cash.
by JC » 10 Aug 2006 14:09
by Forbury Lion » 10 Aug 2006 15:37
That's what I keep telling people, plus Kevin Phillips got the golden boot.... but I'm not sure whether to put my money on Lita, Kitson or Doyle! Can't seem to get odds on top English goalscorer either for Lita and Kitson.HighburyRoyale I suspect most will. Which is understandable, in most people's eyes, we are.
Plus people always make that comparison with Sunderland last season even though the previous record Sunderland held for the First division was followed by a very good season in the Prem.
by TVPRoyal » 10 Aug 2006 19:21
by davis69 » 10 Aug 2006 19:25
Einstein agogoreading98wallyroyal £10million debts. how the hell does he know that.
Well the chairman has always been open about our finaces which are solid but we have always run at a lose cause we never got near the crowds we needed so it adds up, doesn't it really.
10 million is basically a profit compard to other clubs.
it was 16 last year so it's gone down
just running costs.. i think the stadium/hotel etc come under a different set of accounts..and generally property is really seen as an asset despite the huge outlay etc.
by Stranded » 10 Aug 2006 19:27
davis69Einstein agogoreading98wallyroyal £10million debts. how the hell does he know that.
Well the chairman has always been open about our finaces which are solid but we have always run at a lose cause we never got near the crowds we needed so it adds up, doesn't it really.
10 million is basically a profit compard to other clubs.
it was 16 last year so it's gone down
just running costs.. i think the stadium/hotel etc come under a different set of accounts..and generally property is really seen as an asset despite the huge outlay etc.
all madejski has to do is give us that 10 million instead of spending it on art
by Ian Royal » 10 Aug 2006 19:45
Strandeddavis69Einstein agogoreading98wallyroyal £10million debts. how the hell does he know that.
Well the chairman has always been open about our finaces which are solid but we have always run at a lose cause we never got near the crowds we needed so it adds up, doesn't it really.
10 million is basically a profit compard to other clubs.
it was 16 last year so it's gone down
just running costs.. i think the stadium/hotel etc come under a different set of accounts..and generally property is really seen as an asset despite the huge outlay etc.
all madejski has to do is give us that 10 million instead of spending it on art
Just no.
by JC » 10 Aug 2006 22:25
davis69Einstein agogoreading98wallyroyal £10million debts. how the hell does he know that.
Well the chairman has always been open about our finaces which are solid but we have always run at a lose cause we never got near the crowds we needed so it adds up, doesn't it really.
10 million is basically a profit compard to other clubs.
it was 16 last year so it's gone down
just running costs.. i think the stadium/hotel etc come under a different set of accounts..and generally property is really seen as an asset despite the huge outlay etc.
all madejski has to do is give us that 10 million instead of spending it on art
Users browsing this forum: ankeny, Biscuit goalie, Google Adsense [Bot], Jammy Dodger, Orion1871, Richard, Royal Ginger, Snowflake Royal, Sutekh, WestYorksRoyal and 517 guests