John 3:16 If he had he'd have noticed that it was a foul throw. Foot clearly across the line. The touchline belongs to the pitch, so even if you are just touching it, you are on the pitch... which of course you can't be for a throw in.
Sun TzuJohn 3:16 If he had he'd have noticed that it was a foul throw. Foot clearly across the line. The touchline belongs to the pitch, so even if you are just touching it, you are on the pitch... which of course you can't be for a throw in.
That is 100% wrong !
As long as some part of each foot is on or behind the touchline it's a legal throw
At the moment of delivering the ball, the thrower [snip] has part of each foot either on the touch line or on the ground outside the touch line
PlasticRoyale I notice the Refs are only sending Readings BLACK players off....
Draw your own conclusions
Edit - a dig at the refs BTW
Sun TzuJohn 3:16 If he had he'd have noticed that it was a foul throw. Foot clearly across the line. The touchline belongs to the pitch, so even if you are just touching it, you are on the pitch... which of course you can't be for a throw in.
That is 100% wrong !
As long as some part of each foot is on or behind the touchline it's a legal throw
The Real Sandhurst Royal The standard of referees in the championship is very poor.
Kebe gets a straight red for doing nothing and Jensen the Burnley keeper gives away a penatly and is the last man and does not even get a yellow.
The CubeSun TzuJohn 3:16 If he had he'd have noticed that it was a foul throw. Foot clearly across the line. The touchline belongs to the pitch, so even if you are just touching it, you are on the pitch... which of course you can't be for a throw in.
That is 100% wrong !
As long as some part of each foot is on or behind the touchline it's a legal throw
Well John 3:16 is definitely wrong (that's not intended as a theological statement....) and Sun Tzu may be right but the statement's ambiguous so I can't be certain. Careers in football punditry beckon for both of you, with John 3:16 clearly in the lead.At the moment of delivering the ball, the thrower [snip] has part of each foot either on the touch line or on the ground outside the touch line
SCIAG See my post, Sun.
Smoking Kills Dancing Doe The problem is in the Championship, unless it's a tv game, it's all filmed at the one angle. Which doesn't actually show what happened.
Like with Bikey, or Ivar at Bradford a few years back, nothing can be done.
chandogSmoking Kills Dancing Doe The problem is in the Championship, unless it's a tv game, it's all filmed at the one angle. Which doesn't actually show what happened.
Like with Bikey, or Ivar at Bradford a few years back, nothing can be done.
that is our punishment for playing shite last season
rfcjoechandogSmoking Kills Dancing Doe The problem is in the Championship, unless it's a tv game, it's all filmed at the one angle. Which doesn't actually show what happened.
Like with Bikey, or Ivar at Bradford a few years back, nothing can be done.
that is our punishment for playing shite last season
and coppell for being too loyal....but thats all in the past now...
chandog why blame coppell when its so much easier to blame madejski for all our problems
Royalshowchandog why blame coppell when its so much easier to blame madejski for all our problems
Exactly, everytime we do not win 10 goals to nil i blame Madejski.
Jackson Corner If that's classed as violent conduct then god help us. If rugby implied the same level for violent conduct the game would end up 5 a side!
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Horsham Royal and 189 guests
