by AthleticoSpizz » 11 Oct 2020 20:49
by Zip » 11 Oct 2020 21:53
AthleticoSpizz ....nor would a lot of the nation
they couldn’t watch the game thanks to the ‘money men’
National team?
by Royal Rother » 12 Oct 2020 06:55
WestYorksRoyal
One of the things I liked about 2018 was Southgate picked the players who deserved to play, but now he's turning into all other England managers by sticking with favourites and allowing the team to become stale and turgid
ZipAthleticoSpizz ....nor would a lot of the nation
they couldn’t watch the game thanks to the ‘money men’
National team?
It’s wrong. Shameful that the majority of the country cannot watch their national team unless they subscribe. Not good enough.
by PieEater » 12 Oct 2020 09:48
by WestYorksRoyal » 12 Oct 2020 13:53
by Simmops » 12 Oct 2020 21:37
Old Man AndrewsZipAthleticoSpizz ....nor would a lot of the nation
they couldn’t watch the game thanks to the ‘money men’
National team?
It’s wrong. Shameful that the majority of the country cannot watch their national team unless they subscribe. Not good enough.
Yep agreed. It should be law that the big three national sports at international level, cricket, rugby and football, should be on terrestrial TV. Shouldn't even be a debate.
by URZZZZ » 13 Oct 2020 11:42
WestYorksRoyal I thought KDB must have had a knock. Anyway, fair play after my HT rant; greatly improved 2nd half and victory just about deserved.
Not free flowing exciting football, but who were the last team to win a major tournament that way? Even the Spain team from 2008 - 2012 had to grind out victories on the way. To be able to come out on top in a game like that is a good step.
by Royal Rother » 14 Oct 2020 19:30
by bcubed » 14 Oct 2020 19:53
Royal Rother Still no Grealish.
by Royal Rother » 14 Oct 2020 20:01
by BR0B0T » 14 Oct 2020 20:17
by bcubed » 14 Oct 2020 20:19
by bcubed » 14 Oct 2020 20:20
by WestYorksRoyal » 14 Oct 2020 20:24
by Ascotexgunner » 14 Oct 2020 20:43
ZipAthleticoSpizz ....nor would a lot of the nation
they couldn’t watch the game thanks to the ‘money men’
National team?
It’s wrong. Shameful that the majority of the country cannot watch their national team unless they subscribe. Not good enough.
by Zip » 14 Oct 2020 20:52
AscotexgunnerZipAthleticoSpizz ....nor would a lot of the nation
they couldn’t watch the game thanks to the ‘money men’
National team?
It’s wrong. Shameful that the majority of the country cannot watch their national team unless they subscribe. Not good enough.
I just thought about that and saw your comment. The EPL and EFL are products....I get that....but National football. Just don't understand how it's got to this. Credit to the BBC for showing Wales games because they know the majority couldn't afford it and we are not as big a draw as England.....but international football should be sacred.
Wonder how long it is before the World Cup and FIFA start opening themselves up to the money men.
by AthleticoSpizz » 14 Oct 2020 20:53
by Ascotexgunner » 14 Oct 2020 21:09
ZipAscotexgunnerZip
It’s wrong. Shameful that the majority of the country cannot watch their national team unless they subscribe. Not good enough.
I just thought about that and saw your comment. The EPL and EFL are products....I get that....but National football. Just don't understand how it's got to this. Credit to the BBC for showing Wales games because they know the majority couldn't afford it and we are not as big a draw as England.....but international football should be sacred.
Wonder how long it is before the World Cup and FIFA start opening themselves up to the money men.
I would be astonished if FIFA went down that route with the World Cup. I don’t think that day will ever arrive. Certainly hope not,
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 78 guests