genomeNathStPaul Harry Kane has apparently no showed Tottenham pre season training.
Maybe he shouldn't have signed a 6 year contract then.
NathStPaulgenomeNathStPaul Harry Kane has apparently no showed Tottenham pre season training.
Maybe he shouldn't have signed a 6 year contract then.
That is one side of it and the most important side for sure. My only sympathy with Kane is if he has been lied to. If there was an agreement in place that he would be sold and he and Levy shook hands on it then it should have been honoured. I can understand his frustration on that front.
Still should go to work though.
Sanguine Verbal agreements matter, DD. They are about trust. It may be the case that Kane signed his new contract on the basis that it provided value to Spurs as a transfer asset, and that he would be allowed to leave. He's no 'mug' for accepting that if that is what was discussed.
And no, Kane won't deserve 'abuse'. Any more than Jack Grealish's wife was told on social media to 'get cancer and die'. Seriously, get a grip.
SimmopsSanguine Verbal agreements matter, DD. They are about trust. It may be the case that Kane signed his new contract on the basis that it provided value to Spurs as a transfer asset, and that he would be allowed to leave. He's no 'mug' for accepting that if that is what was discussed.
And no, Kane won't deserve 'abuse'. Any more than Jack Grealish's wife was told on social media to 'get cancer and die'. Seriously, get a grip.
Woah hold on a minute. I didn't even know about that last part so you can't use it in an argument.
Verbal agreements may 'matter' but in reality in a court of law they mean oxf*rd all. If he didn't put a get out clause in his contract in writing him and his agent are oxf*rd thick.
You really think he has a leg to stand on in a 'he said she said' situation like this? Get a grip.
SanguineSimmopsSanguine Verbal agreements matter, DD. They are about trust. It may be the case that Kane signed his new contract on the basis that it provided value to Spurs as a transfer asset, and that he would be allowed to leave. He's no 'mug' for accepting that if that is what was discussed.
And no, Kane won't deserve 'abuse'. Any more than Jack Grealish's wife was told on social media to 'get cancer and die'. Seriously, get a grip.
Woah hold on a minute. I didn't even know about that last part so you can't use it in an argument.
Verbal agreements may 'matter' but in reality in a court of law they mean oxf*rd all. If he didn't put a get out clause in his contract in writing him and his agent are oxf*rd thick.
You really think he has a leg to stand on in a 'he said she said' situation like this? Get a grip.
Yeah, didn't think you'd understand softer things like a verbal agreement and nuance. I'm not talking about a court of law, and I'm sure Kane and his agent aren't either.
.SimmopsSanguine Verbal agreements matter, DD. They are about trust. It may be the case that Kane signed his new contract on the basis that it provided value to Spurs as a transfer asset, and that he would be allowed to leave. He's no 'mug' for accepting that if that is what was discussed.
And no, Kane won't deserve 'abuse'. Any more than Jack Grealish's wife was told on social media to 'get cancer and die'. Seriously, get a grip.
Woah hold on a minute. I didn't even know about that last part so you can't use it in an argument.
Verbal agreements may 'matter' but in reality in a court of law they mean oxf*rd all. If he didn't put a get out clause in his contract in writing him and his agent are oxf*rd thick.
You really think he has a leg to stand on in a 'he said she said' situation like this? Get a grip.
HendoSimmopsSanguine Verbal agreements matter, DD. They are about trust. It may be the case that Kane signed his new contract on the basis that it provided value to Spurs as a transfer asset, and that he would be allowed to leave. He's no 'mug' for accepting that if that is what was discussed.
And no, Kane won't deserve 'abuse'. Any more than Jack Grealish's wife was told on social media to 'get cancer and die'. Seriously, get a grip.
Woah hold on a minute. I didn't even know about that last part so you can't use it in an argument.
Verbal agreements may 'matter' but in reality in a court of law they mean oxf*rd all. If he didn't put a get out clause in his contract in writing him and his agent are oxf*rd thick.
You really think he has a leg to stand on in a 'he said she said' situation like this? Get a grip.
Wrong.
SimmopsHendoSimmops
Woah hold on a minute. I didn't even know about that last part so you can't use it in an argument.
Verbal agreements may 'matter' but in reality in a court of law they mean oxf*rd all. If he didn't put a get out clause in his contract in writing him and his agent are oxf*rd thick.
You really think he has a leg to stand on in a 'he said she said' situation like this? Get a grip.
Wrong.
No. It depends on the nuances (see Sanguine) of it. If legal terms were intended to be written down.
Which is bizarre because surely they will be in his contract then?
https://www.farleys.com/verbal-agreemen ... y-binding/
What constitutes a verbal contract?
As with written agreements, a verbal contract requires an offer, an acceptance of that offer, and consideration (i.e., a bargained-for exchange). Once a complete verbal agreement has been made between two “competent” parties, the contract is just as legally binding as a written contract and claims can be made against a breaching party.
Sanguine I wasn't being snide DD, I'm quite open about how much of a bellend I think you are.
You don't understand what I wrote, so you're struggling to engage with it. I'll repeat, just once more, I'm not talking about the courts and the law.
And Hendo is also right, above.
NathStPaul Why does anyone respond? Seriously?
HendoSimmopsHendo
Wrong.
No. It depends on the nuances (see Sanguine) of it. If legal terms were intended to be written down.
Which is bizarre because surely they will be in his contract then?
https://www.farleys.com/verbal-agreemen ... y-binding/
No you're wrong. You said the mean oxf*rd all, which is wrong - they can be enforced and are just as legally binding as a written contract.What constitutes a verbal contract?
As with written agreements, a verbal contract requires an offer, an acceptance of that offer, and consideration (i.e., a bargained-for exchange). Once a complete verbal agreement has been made between two “competent” parties, the contract is just as legally binding as a written contract and claims can be made against a breaching party.
https://londonlawpractice.com/how-to-enforce-a-verbal-contract/
SimmopsSanguine I wasn't being snide DD, I'm quite open about how much of a bellend I think you are.
You don't understand what I wrote, so you're struggling to engage with it. I'll repeat, just once more, I'm not talking about the courts and the law.
And Hendo is also right, above.
Why are you being a dick head? I haven't done anything to you or said anything to you but you play big will.i.am behind a screen.
Ginger pillock
SanguineSimmopsSanguine I wasn't being snide DD, I'm quite open about how much of a bellend I think you are.
You don't understand what I wrote, so you're struggling to engage with it. I'll repeat, just once more, I'm not talking about the courts and the law.
And Hendo is also right, above.
Why are you being a dick head? I haven't done anything to you or said anything to you but you play big will.i.am behind a screen.
Ginger pillock
I'm saying you either can't understand what I wrote, or you chose to ignore it. And I'm about as ginger as Tom Selleck.
And I'm not 'playing' anything, I'd say the same to your face.
Users browsing this forum: Who Moved The Goalposts? and 117 guests
