by harmoye » 19 Nov 2015 15:01
by genome » 19 Nov 2015 15:03
by melonhead » 19 Nov 2015 15:22
by The Cap » 19 Nov 2015 15:29
genome wrote:
Can you imagine Pearson vs media heavyweight and renowned ball-buster Tim Dellor?
by Gordons Cumming » 19 Nov 2015 15:31
by RustyRoyal » 19 Nov 2015 15:39
by harmoye » 19 Nov 2015 18:13
by harmoye » 19 Nov 2015 18:34
by Jagermesiter1871 » 19 Nov 2015 19:20
by JIM » 19 Nov 2015 19:37
by Ian Royal » 20 Nov 2015 00:43
by elrey » 20 Nov 2015 04:26
by RustyRoyal » 20 Nov 2015 08:21
elrey Pearson is another Adkins.
He got lucky, got a team with lots of money, had success, moved to the Premiership with it all.
Ranieri is showing that Leicester aren't just a Championship team in disguise.
by Royal Ginger » 21 Nov 2015 00:52
by SydenhamRoyal » 22 Nov 2015 17:07
Ian Royal Was dead against Pearson until someone pointed out he's supposed to have punched Mills. If Vision thinks the mentalism was overblown I'm sold.
Shame we'll not get him.
by Ian Royal » 22 Nov 2015 18:40
SydenhamRoyalIan Royal Was dead against Pearson until someone pointed out he's supposed to have punched Mills. If Vision thinks the mentalism was overblown I'm sold.
Shame we'll not get him.
I thought it was a headbutt?
by strap » 22 Nov 2015 20:37
by Tommio » 22 Nov 2015 21:05
strap Apparently Fulham couldn't afford to pay compo for Pearson's preferred backroom staff Craig Shakespeare and another whose name escapes me, still currently at Leicester. They wanted Fulham to also match their current PL salaries. (Lost the link, but will put up when I find again - an article on NewsNow)
So that would have counted us out of the running presumably. Maybe Fulham don't have as much money as Fulham fans are led to believe?
by West Stand Man » 22 Nov 2015 21:23
Tommiostrap Apparently Fulham couldn't afford to pay compo for Pearson's preferred backroom staff Craig Shakespeare and another whose name escapes me, still currently at Leicester. They wanted Fulham to also match their current PL salaries. (Lost the link, but will put up when I find again - an article on NewsNow)
So that would have counted us out of the running presumably. Maybe Fulham don't have as much money as Fulham fans are led to believe?
The fact they spent £10m+ on McCormack and £4m on Cairney shows they have money.
by Tommio » 22 Nov 2015 22:32
West Stand ManTommiostrap Apparently Fulham couldn't afford to pay compo for Pearson's preferred backroom staff Craig Shakespeare and another whose name escapes me, still currently at Leicester. They wanted Fulham to also match their current PL salaries. (Lost the link, but will put up when I find again - an article on NewsNow)
So that would have counted us out of the running presumably. Maybe Fulham don't have as much money as Fulham fans are led to believe?
The fact they spent £10m+ on McCormack and £4m on Cairney shows they have money.
Actually it shows that they did have money. If all they had was £14m then they have already spent it.
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 182 guests