by ROWY » 22 Oct 2006 09:48
by Jimbo » 22 Oct 2006 11:37
Due to Reading's policy of safety-first football
by Coppelloadofthat » 22 Oct 2006 12:05
Jimbo wrote:Due to Reading's policy of safety-first football
What does that mean???
by Tails » 22 Oct 2006 12:08
by thefruits » 23 Oct 2006 12:38
by Gordons Cumming » 23 Oct 2006 12:48
thefruits wrote:Guess yesterday showed Harper why he was let go.. shame really but he was completely outclassed yesterday
by Alan Partridge » 23 Oct 2006 12:49
by NTRoyal » 23 Oct 2006 17:14
by brendywendy » 23 Oct 2006 17:17
by Alan Partridge » 23 Oct 2006 17:17
NTRoyal wrote:Harps was one of better players yesterdy, better than that Arsenal obsessed idiot Sidwell, he seemed quite happy to get on and let them win.
Harps was excellent, again he gets slated for not being spectacular, most of our good set plays were from him, he passed well, harrased and was composed.
by Alan Partridge » 23 Oct 2006 17:22
by Gordons Cumming » 23 Oct 2006 17:26
Alan Partridge wrote:Harps in the post
Their players are all over the place. It’s just so fluid and at 4-0 they just kept the ball. They must have made 100 passes and I just wanted to hit someone!
Why didn't you James? Alright not punch them but why not make one or two tackles mate!!!!!
by Alan Partridge » 23 Oct 2006 17:27
Gordons Cumming wrote:Alan Partridge wrote:Harps in the post
Their players are all over the place. It’s just so fluid and at 4-0 they just kept the ball. They must have made 100 passes and I just wanted to hit someone!
Why didn't you James? Alright not punch them but why not make one or two tackles mate!!!!!
There passing was so quick by the time a tackle was put in, or not, the ball was gone.
Can't tackle them without the ball.
by Gordons Cumming » 23 Oct 2006 17:28
Alan Partridge wrote:Gordons Cumming wrote:Alan Partridge wrote:Harps in the post
Their players are all over the place. It’s just so fluid and at 4-0 they just kept the ball. They must have made 100 passes and I just wanted to hit someone!
Why didn't you James? Alright not punch them but why not make one or two tackles mate!!!!!
There passing was so quick by the time a tackle was put in, or not, the ball was gone.
Can't tackle them without the ball.Yes they were good but are you saying that they passed it SO quick it was impossible for us to put a tackle in?
![]()
![]()
by NTRoyal » 23 Oct 2006 17:32
Alan Partridge wrote:NTRoyal wrote:Harps was one of better players yesterdy, better than that Arsenal obsessed idiot Sidwell, he seemed quite happy to get on and let them win.
Harps was excellent, again he gets slated for not being spectacular, most of our good set plays were from him, he passed well, harrased and was composed.
Harper? Did he play?
by Alan Partridge » 23 Oct 2006 17:32
Gordons Cumming wrote:Alan Partridge wrote:Gordons Cumming wrote:Alan Partridge wrote:Harps in the post
Their players are all over the place. It’s just so fluid and at 4-0 they just kept the ball. They must have made 100 passes and I just wanted to hit someone!
Why didn't you James? Alright not punch them but why not make one or two tackles mate!!!!!
There passing was so quick by the time a tackle was put in, or not, the ball was gone.
Can't tackle them without the ball.Yes they were good but are you saying that they passed it SO quick it was impossible for us to put a tackle in?
![]()
![]()
Yep
by Alan Partridge » 23 Oct 2006 17:33
NTRoyal wrote:Alan Partridge wrote:NTRoyal wrote:Harps was one of better players yesterdy, better than that Arsenal obsessed idiot Sidwell, he seemed quite happy to get on and let them win.
Harps was excellent, again he gets slated for not being spectacular, most of our good set plays were from him, he passed well, harrased and was composed.
Harper? Did he play?
Yes, and he was very good. probably our MOTM.
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Semrush [Bot] and 547 guests