Edited.windermereROYAL wrote:That`s right up there was one of our poorest performances ever. desperately awful, feel sorry for the travelling fans who were charged £30 to watch that on a Tuesday night.
by under the tin » 10 Mar 2026 22:08
Edited.windermereROYAL wrote:That`s right up there was one of our poorest performances ever. desperately awful, feel sorry for the travelling fans who were charged £30 to watch that on a Tuesday night.
by Brogue » 10 Mar 2026 22:09
by Brogue » 10 Mar 2026 22:11
An absolutely terrible takeWestYorksRoyal wrote:A lot of overreaction to one bad result.
by Royal Monkey » 10 Mar 2026 22:14
by MR. CYNICAL » 10 Mar 2026 22:19
Exactly what I've been saying, can't remember the last time I've left a game thinking we'd played well, even when we've won.Brogue wrote:Anyone with any footballing clue, knows how we played tonight is how we’ve played in 95% of games since November. Difference is we didn’t get lucky this time. Tonight summed up our general play perfectly
by MR. CYNICAL » 10 Mar 2026 22:36
by Sutekh » 10 Mar 2026 23:16
Leam said they had the quantity but we had the quality shot-wise. And the one they did get was yet another sodding deflection.MR. CYNICAL wrote:I pointed out after the Luton game that we had to defend 29 crosses, tonight it was 38 so obviously haven't learned any lessons, that's aside of the 17 shots Mansfield had, 7 on target.
by Jackson Corner » 11 Mar 2026 00:39
Why treat us like oxf*rd idiots. I hate managers who try to sugar coat dreadful performances. Just say we were rubbish and they were better and deserved the win. At least then l would have some respect for him.Sutekh wrote:Leam said they had the quantity but we had the quality shot-wise. And the one they did get was yet another sodding deflection.MR. CYNICAL wrote:I pointed out after the Luton game that we had to defend 29 crosses, tonight it was 38 so obviously haven't learned any lessons, that's aside of the 17 shots Mansfield had, 7 on target.
by Hound » 11 Mar 2026 07:16
by tidus_mi2 » 11 Mar 2026 09:53
by Sutekh » 11 Mar 2026 10:05
So all over to Prospect Park for training leading up to travelling to places with poor pitches?tidus_mi2 wrote:I had a think about last night and some of our previous insipid performances, is it possible we're not possibly preparing adequately for some of these games? We train and prepare in Prem/Champ standard facilities then go and play on a proper worn down League One pitch.
by leon » 11 Mar 2026 11:09
that affects our "midfield's" ability to provide out balls when we're defending?tidus_mi2 wrote:I had a think about last night and some of our previous insipid performances, is it possible we're not possibly preparing adequately for some of these games? We train and prepare in Prem/Champ standard facilities then go and play on a proper worn down League One pitch.
by morganb » 11 Mar 2026 11:10
There are numerous pitches at Bearwood so perhaps we could re-purpose a few to give us a variety of different surface qualities plus add a wind machine, a rain machine and a a sign saying "Welcome to Valley Parade". We should also run "after dark" sessions and also invite a few fans down to emulate a real crowd (or have noises played back like during Covid) Add a couple of useless officials and we'd have the full match day experience in a nutshellSutekh wrote:So all over to Prospect Park for training leading up to travelling to places with poor pitches?tidus_mi2 wrote:I had a think about last night and some of our previous insipid performances, is it possible we're not possibly preparing adequately for some of these games? We train and prepare in Prem/Champ standard facilities then go and play on a proper worn down League One pitch.
by MR. CYNICAL » 11 Mar 2026 11:19
Trying to work out how, even though we had the quality shot -wise, we managed to lose 1-0!Sutekh wrote:Leam said they had the quantity but we had the quality shot-wise. And the one they did get was yet another sodding deflection.MR. CYNICAL wrote:I pointed out after the Luton game that we had to defend 29 crosses, tonight it was 38 so obviously haven't learned any lessons, that's aside of the 17 shots Mansfield had, 7 on target.
by Brum Royal » 11 Mar 2026 11:52
by Brogue » 11 Mar 2026 12:19
by Jagermesiter1871 » 11 Mar 2026 12:29
Disagree. I thought wing was a stand out awful performance. The amount of times he passed the ball to the opposition or slipped in possession gifting the ball, all in extremely dangerous areas was crazy.Hound wrote:I can’t remember many games when you can say absolutely everyone was awful. A couple tried the make things happen (R Williams mainly) but failed far more often than not
Just horrendous all round, barely strong a couple of passes together against a pretty weak Mansfield side
JP looks all over the shop. Doyle just about pips everyone else for the worst of the lot
Anyway, it’s one poor result after a load of good ones. We’ve had our luck recently so can’t complain too much.
by SouthDownsRoyal » 11 Mar 2026 12:29
You can say that againGunny Fishcake wrote:Gunny Fishcake wrote:What a truly atrocious performance, I don’t think their keeper touched the ball in the second half.
To think there was a chance to get in the play offs zone, it defies belief
Respect to the poor fans who have the long drive home after that debacle
by Greatwesternline » 11 Mar 2026 12:34
You do actually want to be at the top of caught offside table.Brogue wrote:a couple of stats that I've been looking into;
we've been caught off side 45 times this season. only Mansfield have been caught off side fewer times on 38. Now whilst this isn't a table we want to be top of, it does indicate that we don't get into many attacking situations. and certainly shows we don't play off the shoulder of the last defender.
then i looked into the number of crosses this season 539 - we are bottom of the league for the number of crosses this season.
So if we aren't going through the middle, and we aren't getting crosses into the box, then what the hell are we doing? its all very odd.
And on the defensive side we had to deal with 38 crosses from mansfield
28 against luton
24 against bradford
30 against port vale
43 against bolton
34 against wycombe
and so on and so on
Bolton are top of the crosses league table with an average of 23 crosses a game. we are conceding nearly double the number of crosses in some games than the best team in the league manages on crossing to average per game.
So we have no width, we don't go through the middle, we don't play off the shoulder of defenders, and we concede the most amount of crosses into our box than any team in the division.
by Horsham Royal » 11 Mar 2026 13:14
Brogue wrote:we've been caught off side 45 times this season. only Mansfield have been caught off side fewer times on 38
I think that was Brogue's point. We're second bottom (Mansfield below).Greatwesternline wrote:You do actually want to be at the top of caught offside table.
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Amazon [Bot], Baidu [Spider], Majestic-12 [Bot], Semrush [Bot] and 397 guests