by NewCorkSeth »
14 Jan 2020 14:56
Old Man Andrews wrote:NewCorkSeth wrote:Old Man Andrews wrote:We are not a big club and they are not a tiny club struggling to make ends meet, you aren't understanding the point. Not all replays are lucrative but to elminate them altogether will remove any chance of a small club getting the rub of the lucrative replay.
I wasnt trying to be snippy I was genuinely curious. The winner of this match gets 135.5k. The loser gets less than that but I dont know by how much.
If the FA decided to take a couple of Million and invest in the FA cup prize money making it slightly more for smaller clubs and slightly less for larger clubs (for example, do United need 180k for winning the 4th round??) Then replays could be cut out.
I mean, realistically, are smaller clubs going to make 135.5k from hosting a replay? Nah.
No snippiness at all.
I think it all depends on the club hositing and the size of their facilities. For example you could have Plymouth get a draw away from home at Arsenal. They would then bring them back to Home Park that houses 18,600. £20 a ticket = £372,000 then you will have £250k for the TV rights to the replay. Obviously you can adjust the gate receipts dependent on the ground capacity of the smaller club.
I had thought you detected snippiness in my comment. Good to see you didnt.
I get your point but that is a particularly successful example you put forward. Most replays are unlikely to be against the top teams and are also unlikely to sell out.
I mean, look at the replays today.
I think limiting the amount of games each season has to be done at some point or 3lse we are going to see more and more heart attacks in the sport. There is, imo, definitely an economically fair way to do away with replays. However you are correct to point out the small clubs need to be looked after.