Therealefl.co.ukSutekh wrote:Who is responsible for this rumour, whodunit?
https://www.coventrytelegraph.net/sport ... e_vignetteMark Robins admits he’s “happy” that Fabio Tavares stayed at Coventry City on transfer deadline day when the player was the subject of firm interest from League One Reading.
Although the Royals have been under a transfer embargo and unable to make signings until a proposed club takeover is complete and a budget confirmed, the EFL authorised the club to take a loan player last Friday when Tavares emerged as one of the club’s targets.
Very strange story - as if we'd have forced through a loan signing if they'd wanted to keep hold of him.morganb wrote:https://www.coventrytelegraph.net/sport ... e_vignetteMark Robins admits he’s “happy” that Fabio Tavares stayed at Coventry City on transfer deadline day when the player was the subject of firm interest from League One Reading.
Although the Royals have been under a transfer embargo and unable to make signings until a proposed club takeover is complete and a budget confirmed, the EFL authorised the club to take a loan player last Friday when Tavares emerged as one of the club’s targets.
Logically it means they would have been prepared to let him go but as he didn’t leave they are happy to still have him. Which makes sense as it would be a bit cruel,to say they are disappointed they weren’t able to ship him out…Royalwaster wrote:Very strange story - as if we'd have forced through a loan signing if they'd wanted to keep hold of him.morganb wrote:https://www.coventrytelegraph.net/sport ... e_vignetteMark Robins admits he’s “happy” that Fabio Tavares stayed at Coventry City on transfer deadline day when the player was the subject of firm interest from League One Reading.
Although the Royals have been under a transfer embargo and unable to make signings until a proposed club takeover is complete and a budget confirmed, the EFL authorised the club to take a loan player last Friday when Tavares emerged as one of the club’s targets.
Or they were trying to loan him out and it's PR to make the player more content with the situation.Crusader Royal wrote:Logically it means they would have been prepared to let him go but as he didn’t leave they are happy to still have him. Which makes sense as it would be a bit cruel,to say they are disappointed they weren’t able to ship him out…Royalwaster wrote:Very strange story - as if we'd have forced through a loan signing if they'd wanted to keep hold of him.morganb wrote:
https://www.coventrytelegraph.net/sport ... e_vignette
Coventry would have been missing an angel if he had left.Clyde1998 wrote:Or they were trying to loan him out and it's PR to make the player more content with the situation.Crusader Royal wrote:Logically it means they would have been prepared to let him go but as he didn’t leave they are happy to still have him. Which makes sense as it would be a bit cruel,to say they are disappointed they weren’t able to ship him out…Royalwaster wrote:
Very strange story - as if we'd have forced through a loan signing if they'd wanted to keep hold of him.
It only takes a minute for him to do so...Sutekh wrote:Coventry would have been missing an angel if he had left.Clyde1998 wrote:Or they were trying to loan him out and it's PR to make the player more content with the situation.Crusader Royal wrote:
Logically it means they would have been prepared to let him go but as he didn’t leave they are happy to still have him. Which makes sense as it would be a bit cruel,to say they are disappointed they weren’t able to ship him out…
Ah interesting.WestYorksRoyal wrote:Utter bollocks. Takeover is not done and nobody is coming in.
My understanding is its gone ahead at least 7 times in the last 2 months.Millsy wrote:Ah interesting.WestYorksRoyal wrote:Utter bollocks. Takeover is not done and nobody is coming in.
Any news on the takeover?
Awesome thanks!Snowflake Royal wrote:My understanding is its gone ahead at least 7 times in the last 2 months.Millsy wrote:Ah interesting.WestYorksRoyal wrote:Utter bollocks. Takeover is not done and nobody is coming in.
Any news on the takeover?
It’s not happening nowMillsy wrote:Ah interesting.WestYorksRoyal wrote:Utter bollocks. Takeover is not done and nobody is coming in.
Any news on the takeover?
Oh that's annoying isn't it.SouthDownsRoyal wrote:It’s not happening nowMillsy wrote:Ah interesting.WestYorksRoyal wrote:Utter bollocks. Takeover is not done and nobody is coming in.
Any news on the takeover?
Good idea m9, surprised there isn’t one alreadyMillsy wrote:Oh that's annoying isn't it.SouthDownsRoyal wrote:It’s not happening nowMillsy wrote:
Ah interesting.
Any news on the takeover?
We should start a thread about it.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests