Try reading it. He was mistaken and we sorted it out. He replied to a post that was edited to look like it was about him. Nothing to do with you.genome wrote:It would be nice to open a thread and not find OMA arguing with someone
I couldn't give a shit. I'm just saying I'm tired of opening threads and seeing constant arguments. I will leave it there, lest you turn it into another argument.Old Man Andrews wrote:Try reading it. He was mistaken and we sorted it out. He replied to a post that was edited to look like it was about him. Nothing to do with you.genome wrote:It would be nice to open a thread and not find OMA arguing with someone
It wasn't an argument it was an amicable discussion that we resolved and again it didn't have anything to do with you. What are you expecting to see on a forum where there are lots of different views on things by the way? Of course there will be debate and argument. As long as it isn't personal then its fair game.genome wrote:I couldn't give a shit. I'm just saying I'm tired of opening threads and seeing constant arguments. I will leave it there, lest you turn it into another argument.Old Man Andrews wrote:Try reading it. He was mistaken and we sorted it out. He replied to a post that was edited to look like it was about him. Nothing to do with you.genome wrote:It would be nice to open a thread and not find OMA arguing with someone
I've told you once.tee peg wrote:Is this a five minute argument or the full half hour?
Woodley was (IMO) demonstrating that OMA was specifically singling me out and ignoring similar comments from other people because he's an irritating troll and unfortunately it seems you got caught in the cross fire.Tilehurstsouthbank wrote:I will apologise (soz). I'm not too stubborn for that. Do you and Woodley have an issue? Why is he stirring the pot?Old Man Andrews wrote:It wasn't directed at you at all. Woodley Royal included it in his response to you, I wasn't speaking to you at all.Tilehurstsouthbank wrote:
So just not directed at me? I think in that case you owe Ian an apology for insinuating that he's a racist. Still, the fact that you've brought race into the equation says more about you. If we'd been talking about a white player, would you have piped up?
Try reading the whole of the thread on Mo Barrow, educate yourself. Then come and apologise to me for claiming that I am calling someone racist.
Ian, I made it clear 3 times in the thread I wasn't for a minute saying you are or were being racist. If you watch the video I posted in the thread it will explain what I meant. Genuinely didn't mean offence. Actually quite fond of you Ian, you are a likeable arse.Snowflake Royal wrote:Woodley was (IMO) demonstrating that OMA was specifically singling me out and ignoring similar comments from other people because he's an irritating troll and unfortunately it seems you got caught in the cross fire.Tilehurstsouthbank wrote:I will apologise (soz). I'm not too stubborn for that. Do you and Woodley have an issue? Why is he stirring the pot?Old Man Andrews wrote:
It wasn't directed at you at all. Woodley Royal included it in his response to you, I wasn't speaking to you at all.
Try reading the whole of the thread on Mo Barrow, educate yourself. Then come and apologise to me for claiming that I am calling someone racist.
Sorry you got splashed by his nonsense with me and (understandably) offended.
No read the thread Ian rather than try and point score.Snowflake Royal wrote:Yes yes, roll it back and play pretend when called. I know the drill.
Rather different to what you said on TB last night Iirc.
Well I think you are a racist mother oxf*rd oxf*rd.Snowflake Royal wrote:Yes yes, roll it back and play pretend when called. I know the drill.
Rather different to what you said on TB last night Iirc.
Cheers Zip, appreciate it.Zip wrote:Well I think you are a racist mother oxf*rd oxf*rd.Snowflake Royal wrote:Yes yes, roll it back and play pretend when called. I know the drill.
Rather different to what you said on TB last night Iirc.
Snowflake Royal wrote:Cheers Zip, appreciate it.Zip wrote:Well I think you are a racist mother oxf*rd oxf*rd.Snowflake Royal wrote:Yes yes, roll it back and play pretend when called. I know the drill.
Rather different to what you said on TB last night Iirc.
I'm off to pick up my black and white minstrel Nazi costume and face paint so I can go and shout monkey noises at Sterling. Just a typical Monday night.Zip wrote:Snowflake Royal wrote:Cheers Zip, appreciate it.Zip wrote:
Well I think you are a racist mother oxf*rd oxf*rd.
I should think so too.
Sutekh wrote:I've told you once.tee peg wrote:Is this a five minute argument or the full half hour?
Way too highbrow for hobnobtee peg wrote:Sutekh wrote:I've told you once.tee peg wrote:Is this a five minute argument or the full half hour?
No you haven't
Cheers SCIAG. I think it is an interesting way of thinking which is why I brought it up, heard it spoken about on Talksport and went back in time a bit to the days of Heskey and Drogba etc and remember the language being used then too. Its the same on a positive language side too, a lot of black footballers always labelled "good athletes" etc as if thats the only thing they are good for. Just thought the wider discussion point was an interesting one and made it clear I didn't think anyone was racist.SCIAG wrote:Actually think OMA was uncharacteristically reasonable in both threads! Well worth asking the question of whether we're treating players unfairly based on their race.
Fezza wrote:Way too highbrow for hobnobtee peg wrote:Sutekh wrote:
I've told you once.
No you haven't
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 16 guests