Josh Laurent, it says so right there.NewCorkSeth wrote:Who?
That is extremely offensive. My eyes are fine I just never learned to read.Hendo wrote:Josh Laurent, it says so right there.NewCorkSeth wrote:Who?
C'mon man, get your eyes tested!
Who said that?NewCorkSeth wrote:That is extremely offensive. My eyes are fine I just never learned to read.Hendo wrote:Josh Laurent, it says so right there.NewCorkSeth wrote:Who?
C'mon man, get your eyes tested!
Cardiff, Stoke or Reading.NewCorkSeth wrote:Who?
NewCorkSeth wrote:That is extremely offensive. My eyes are fine I just never learned to read.Hendo wrote:Josh Laurent, it says so right there.NewCorkSeth wrote:Who?
C'mon man, get your eyes tested!
I don't know what to believe anymore.NewCorkSeth wrote:Enjoyed the shit out of that. Have shit eyesight so missed a fair but in the second half. Looked like Rafael pulled off 2 fantastic saves to keep us in it. Happy days.
Uh oh. I've been rumbled. Time to switch accounts.Pepe the Horseman wrote:NewCorkSeth wrote:That is extremely offensive. My eyes are fine I just never learned to read.Hendo wrote:
Josh Laurent, it says so right there.
C'mon man, get your eyes tested!I don't know what to believe anymore.NewCorkSeth wrote:Enjoyed the shit out of that. Have shit eyesight so missed a fair but in the second half. Looked like Rafael pulled off 2 fantastic saves to keep us in it. Happy days.
just don't get why we would let Barrett go, and then get this guy in.Sutekh wrote:Stoke may actually be slight favourites given he plays for Shrewsbury so would be minimal upheaval
Other that that there isn’t really much difference between the supposed interested parties, least just on the face of things
Maybe he's better than Barrett?WoodleyRoyal wrote:just don't get why we would let Barrett go, and then get this guy in.Sutekh wrote:Stoke may actually be slight favourites given he plays for Shrewsbury so would be minimal upheaval
Other that that there isn’t really much difference between the supposed interested parties, least just on the face of things
Different positions?WoodleyRoyal wrote:just don't get why we would let Barrett go, and then get this guy in.Sutekh wrote:Stoke may actually be slight favourites given he plays for Shrewsbury so would be minimal upheaval
Other that that there isn’t really much difference between the supposed interested parties, least just on the face of things
Nah, you must learn that our academy products are always better. I still lament the decision to sell on Simon Cox and persevere with Shane Long in 2008Royalwaster wrote:Maybe he's better than Barrett?WoodleyRoyal wrote:just don't get why we would let Barrett go, and then get this guy in.Sutekh wrote:Stoke may actually be slight favourites given he plays for Shrewsbury so would be minimal upheaval
Other that that there isn’t really much difference between the supposed interested parties, least just on the face of things
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 23 guests