He’s done well.Hound wrote:dare I say I've been quite impressed with Rooney's handling of it so far?AthleticoSpizz wrote:.....higher.....higher
Easy ride for Wooney now...stay up....hero....relegated....everybody else's fault.
He’s done well.Hound wrote:dare I say I've been quite impressed with Rooney's handling of it so far?AthleticoSpizz wrote:.....higher.....higher
Easy ride for Wooney now...stay up....hero....relegated....everybody else's fault.
Yep, I had my doubts about him, but doing a cracking job, all things considered.Zip wrote:He’s done well.Hound wrote:dare I say I've been quite impressed with Rooney's handling of it so far?AthleticoSpizz wrote:.....higher.....higher
Easy ride for Wooney now...stay up....hero....relegated....everybody else's fault.
Doesn't this sort of thing always come up when someone is found guilty of shenanigans? And literally never comes to anythingFranchise FC wrote:There would appear to be a prima facie case for Wycombe on that basis.Sutekh wrote:It’s not stopping there either. Players have been asked to defer a third of their wages while the administrators seek to sort some of the mess out and find new owners (can’t imagine a name like Derby will have to wait too long for new owners to be found though).Wycombe Royal wrote:Derby officially enter administration and have been deducted 12 points.
However, not only do they have another 9 point deduction in the offing, but Middlesbrough may start legal proceedings against Derby over their financial mismanagement which effectively saw ‘boro miss out on the play offs and lose out on the services of a couple of players through Derby offering deals that contributed to the mess they are now in (see story link below)
https://www.gazettelive.co.uk/sport/foo ... s-21660410
Also, even if Boro and Wycombe are successful, they'll just be an unsecured creditor for a club in administration and will only get a fraction of anything they are awarded.Silver Fox wrote:Doesn't this sort of thing always come up when someone is found guilty of shenanigans? And literally never comes to anythingFranchise FC wrote:There would appear to be a prima facie case for Wycombe on that basis.Sutekh wrote:
It’s not stopping there either. Players have been asked to defer a third of their wages while the administrators seek to sort some of the mess out and find new owners (can’t imagine a name like Derby will have to wait too long for new owners to be found though).
However, not only do they have another 9 point deduction in the offing, but Middlesbrough may start legal proceedings against Derby over their financial mismanagement which effectively saw ‘boro miss out on the play offs and lose out on the services of a couple of players through Derby offering deals that contributed to the mess they are now in (see story link below)
https://www.gazettelive.co.uk/sport/foo ... s-21660410
Yeh, always going to be pretty difficult to prove, but Boro have got a couple of specific examples where Derby paid way over the odds for players Boro were set to sign. So they could argue that had Derby not broken the rules, those players would have ended up at Boro, which would have provided a comfortable swing for them to make the POs. But then of course there's no guarantee they would have won the POs, so not sure what they're hoping to get out of it.genome wrote:I don't think there's much of a case really as you can just say "well, you should've won some more games"
This week's Telegraph report also details how Derby hijacked Boro's move for striker Martyn Waghorn in 2018, paying double the fee that Boro had agreed and offering £10,000 a week more in wages.
Yeah, it's an unpopular take given how everyone loves Ainsworth but I can't help feeling that if there had been less of the "we're just happy to be here" from him at the start of the season they'd have given themselves a far better chance to stay up. The lower end of the championship really isn't all that and Wycombe proved in the second half of the season that they could more than live with those teams.genome wrote:I don't think there's much of a case really as you can just say "well, you should've won some more games"
And Waghorn is shit.SCIAG wrote:This week's Telegraph report also details how Derby hijacked Boro's move for striker Martyn Waghorn in 2018, paying double the fee that Boro had agreed and offering £10,000 a week more in wages.![]()
An extra £10k a week at this level is a lot.
Glass houses ofc but unless boro were being extremely tight then Derby must have been paying well above the going rate.
They've worn blue and white hoops for years.Mid Sussex Royal wrote:QPR score in first min at WBA....strange to see QPR in blue and white hoops though - looks a clash on the tv
But not in 1871Pepe the Horseman wrote:They've worn blue and white hoops for years.Mid Sussex Royal wrote:QPR score in first min at WBA....strange to see QPR in blue and white hoops though - looks a clash on the tv
Silver Fox wrote:Doesn't this sort of thing always come up when someone is found guilty of shenanigans? And literally never comes to anythingFranchise FC wrote:There would appear to be a prima facie case for Wycombe on that basis.Sutekh wrote:
It’s not stopping there either. Players have been asked to defer a third of their wages while the administrators seek to sort some of the mess out and find new owners (can’t imagine a name like Derby will have to wait too long for new owners to be found though).
However, not only do they have another 9 point deduction in the offing, but Middlesbrough may start legal proceedings against Derby over their financial mismanagement which effectively saw ‘boro miss out on the play offs and lose out on the services of a couple of players through Derby offering deals that contributed to the mess they are now in (see story link below)
https://www.gazettelive.co.uk/sport/foo ... s-21660410
If I was Boro, I'd consider that one a lucky escape and keep my mouth shut.Snowflake Royal wrote:And Waghorn is shit.SCIAG wrote:This week's Telegraph report also details how Derby hijacked Boro's move for striker Martyn Waghorn in 2018, paying double the fee that Boro had agreed and offering £10,000 a week more in wages.![]()
An extra £10k a week at this level is a lot.
Glass houses ofc but unless boro were being extremely tight then Derby must have been paying well above the going rate.
Yeah that definitely, and I think the early season 5-0 goosing at Blackburn probably didn’t help their confidence at the start of the season either.Vision wrote:Yeah, it's an unpopular take given how everyone loves Ainsworth but I can't help feeling that if there had been less of the "we're just happy to be here" from him at the start of the season they'd have given themselves a far better chance to stay up. The lower end of the championship really isn't all that and Wycombe proved in the second half of the season that they could more than live with those teams.genome wrote:I don't think there's much of a case really as you can just say "well, you should've won some more games"
Just think they came in with an inferiority complex when they could've been riding the momentum of promotion.
Bristol City 1982 fans seem to be coming in their pants at the mere thought of us getting a 9 point deduction too, maybe drinking too much cider gives you memory loss.From Despair To Where? wrote:If I was Boro, I'd consider that one a lucky escape and keep my mouth shut.Snowflake Royal wrote:And Waghorn is shit.SCIAG wrote:![]()
An extra £10k a week at this level is a lot.
Glass houses ofc but unless boro were being extremely tight then Derby must have been paying well above the going rate.
And whilst we're at it, is this a different Boro to the one that went into administration in the 80s and spent most of the 90s and the early part of this century spaffing the chairman's money on players they probably couldn't afford?
Should point out I have no axe to grind with Middlesbrough. Decent people up there and always a good away day.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], RG30 and 697 guests