by Forbury Lion » 10 Sep 2015 20:33
10 Sep 2015 20:33IN.LumpWarden wrote:Wonder whether the stadium will now also change it's name to 'Royal Elm Park' - thereby using the stadium name to advertise the associated conferencing facilities etc?
by Philly Flyer » 15 Oct 2015 20:29
15 Oct 2015 20:29by CountryRoyal » 15 Oct 2015 21:27
15 Oct 2015 21:27by West Stand Man » 21 Apr 2016 19:32
21 Apr 2016 19:32by The Sum of the Parts » 21 Apr 2016 22:52
21 Apr 2016 22:52Just another way that Peter Coates, owner of Bet365 and Stoke, can funnel money to the football club without falling foul of FFP regulations.West Stand Man wrote:Apropos of nothing to do with RFC, but Stoke are renaming their stadium. Apparently being called after a defunct building society is naff!
by Jackson Corner » 22 Apr 2016 03:07
22 Apr 2016 03:07Lucky cnuts wish it was us. If they get away with it good luck to them.The Sum of the Parts wrote:Just another way that Peter Coates, owner of Bet365 and Stoke, can funnel money to the football club without falling foul of FFP regulations.West Stand Man wrote:Apropos of nothing to do with RFC, but Stoke are renaming their stadium. Apparently being called after a defunct building society is naff!
Stoke make a loss and bet365 make a massive (taxable) profit, so the more of Bet365's profits he can channel across to a loss-making part of his business group, the less tax the profitable one has to pay.
You mean the only guy to have ever kept us in the Premier League in our one season where we finished the highest we've ever finished in our history?Winston Smith wrote:Coppell? Seriously?Coppelled_Streets wrote:I've always supported the idea of a joint statue of Coppell and Madejski arm in arm
144 years of history and you want a statue of a bloke who recently spent just 5 1/2 years at the club in which he oversaw us both promoted & relegated?
by The Sum of the Parts » 22 Apr 2016 11:51
22 Apr 2016 11:51by Maneki Neko » 22 Apr 2016 18:21
22 Apr 2016 18:21I would begrudgingly accept royal elm park sponsored by Grundon, or summatgenome wrote:When REP was announced, I thought it was referring to the stadium name. I'd be totally in for that but it I thought the idea was to sell naming rights to a brand or such like.
by Maneki Neko » 22 Apr 2016 18:28
22 Apr 2016 18:28that would be greatThe Sum of the Parts wrote:I'm not saying a Coppell and Madejski statue would be a good idea, but if for some reason it did come to pass, this absolutely has to be the model for it:
by Kuhl_Runnings » 25 Apr 2016 12:01
25 Apr 2016 12:01by Kuhl_Runnings » 25 Apr 2016 12:04
25 Apr 2016 12:04
by One8Seven1* » 25 Apr 2016 12:24
25 Apr 2016 12:248 months on and...MrSwickle wrote:http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-berkshire-34127367"Reading Football Club's Madejski Stadium is to have its name changed, its owner has confirmed.
Lady Sasima Srivikorn told BBC Radio Berkshire she is in talks with several different companies to bring more sponsorship money to the club.
It has been called the Madejski Stadium, named after co-chairman Sir John Madejski, since it opened in 1998.
Lady Sasima said selling the name was an easy way to raise income, especially as the club was "moving up".
Reading are currently 13th in the Championship but have had several recent spells in the Premier League.
"I know to have the naming right on the stadium can fetch quite a lot of money," she said.
"There are many companies that would like to have that naming right, so that is one way of making the money come in.""
by Elm Park Kid » 25 Apr 2016 15:26
25 Apr 2016 15:26by One8Seven1* » 25 Apr 2016 17:06
25 Apr 2016 17:06I don't recall that at all, and cannot find a quote either. Pg1 is a good start.Elm Park Kid wrote:I'm sure they said at the time that they would only rename the stadium once we got back into the Premier League and they could get a decent long term deal out of it.
So, Mad Stad it is then . . . . . . .
Users browsing this forum: Moonfish and 12 guests