Wrt Wolves, just because their Portuguese doesn’t mean that they’ll automatically look at themroyalp-we wrote:Agree with the general consensus. Club needs to get busy touting Smith / McNulty / Baldock to potential suitors if we do sign Mendes. Only a month to do so. Plus the fact they still need to get a wriggle on and sign a winger or two; and a back up for Richards.
João / Puscas / Mendes / Meite is a really powerful front line. The kind of strikers that do well in the championship a bit like how Mitrović had something about him.
Expect that Wolves will be sniffing round Joao and Mendes if they have a successful season. Puscas and Meite would attract some big suitors too if they build on their goal tally’s from last year. With young and exciting players behind them, We appear to have quite a valuable core set of midfielders and attackers. Show me the money!
But we've got Mark McNulty, Sam Smith and James Melvin-Lambert for that. Why on earth would we want to strengthen our squad? Especially when you take into consideration how well we performed after Joao got injured last season.Hound wrote:Wouldn’t expect mendes to really hit the ground running. Will take a while. Joao dodgy fitness record, as has Baldock. Not sure Puscas shoulder was ever completely fixed either?
Taking into account the regularity of games this season suspect we could carry a striker or 2 more than might look normal on paper
Much more likely to meet FFP by selling Puscas than Baldock seeing as he’s treble the value though. And rather sell now when his stock is high than if he spends a season not getting the minutes. Agree he’s a better player than the others thoughZip wrote:Agreed. Sell Smith, McNulty and Baldock but not Puscas. The problem is how do you keep all of Joao, Meite, Puscas and Mendes (if he signs) happy? They will all want to start games but two or even three may not make the starting line up on a regular basis.Nameless wrote:Losing Puscas would be disappointing. With him we have potentially 3 really good options. Losing him leaves us with an either/or situation. It’s McNulty, Baldock and Smith we should be looking to sell or loan out.Notts Royal wrote:Not against the signing as long as we sell 2 out of Puscas, Baldock & McNulty.
Fenerbache have just sold a striker so would expect them to put a bid in for Puscas shortly.
Notts Royal wrote:Much more likely to meet FFP by selling Puscas than Baldock seeing as he’s treble the value though. And rather sell now when his stock is high than if he spends a season not getting the minutes. Agree he’s a better player than the others thoughZip wrote:Agreed. Sell Smith, McNulty and Baldock but not Puscas. The problem is how do you keep all of Joao, Meite, Puscas and Mendes (if he signs) happy? They will all want to start games but two or even three may not make the starting line up on a regular basis.Nameless wrote:
Losing Puscas would be disappointing. With him we have potentially 3 really good options. Losing him leaves us with an either/or situation. It’s McNulty, Baldock and Smith we should be looking to sell or loan out.
It's mainly because they're in the first team squad.Pepe the Horseman wrote:How can you possibly count McNulty, Smith and especially Melvin-Lambert in the too many strikers argument?
So are Ethan Bristow and Imari Samuels, but we still need another left back, don't we?Snowflake Royal wrote:It's mainly because they're in the first team squad.Pepe the Horseman wrote:How can you possibly count McNulty, Smith and especially Melvin-Lambert in the too many strikers argument?
Yep, agreed. Just making the point that McNulty, Smith and Melvin-Lambert shouldn't be considered as realistic striking options.royalp-we wrote:Stop it Pepe, it’s pretty obvious we have more senior strikers than we have senior LB’s.
Mendes looks like he will be a really good signing. But we clearly need reinforcements in other areas.
The statement that we’re looking at adding 5 or 6 players didn’t have a line that said ‘ unless we get Mendes, in which case we’d won’t bother with the rest’Pepe the Horseman wrote:Yep, agreed. Just making the point that McNulty, Smith and Melvin-Lambert shouldn't be considered as realistic striking options.royalp-we wrote:Stop it Pepe, it’s pretty obvious we have more senior strikers than we have senior LB’s.
Mendes looks like he will be a really good signing. But we clearly need reinforcements in other areas.
We obviously need to strengthen in other areas, but you'd hope they're not going to drop everything else just to sign Mendes.
Probably depends on how Bristow does tomorrow to an extent. Two good showings and it's much less urgent.Pepe the Horseman wrote:So are Ethan Bristow and Imari Samuels, but we still need another left back, don't we?Snowflake Royal wrote:It's mainly because they're in the first team squad.Pepe the Horseman wrote:How can you possibly count McNulty, Smith and especially Melvin-Lambert in the too many strikers argument?
Apparantly he turned us down because we told him we were expecting him to be back up left back, not a striker.CountryRoyal wrote:Now reported as going to Almeria. What a shower
It’s the scarf that is crucial, not the shirt....Stranded wrote:At this point, it's just best to ignore any rumours on this guy until he turns up in either a Reading, Almeria (or another clubs) shirt.
Users browsing this forum: WestYorksRoyal and 25 guests