by BR0B0T » 10 Aug 2019 16:14
10 Aug 2019 16:14by NewCorkSeth » 10 Aug 2019 16:14
10 Aug 2019 16:14Shape in second half is hard to tell tbh. It seems to be a 4-1-2-1-2Snowflake Royal wrote:Anyone actually watching either got a link, or got a description for our shape?
Although having watched the Wednesday match, I'm perfectly willing to believe that our shape is utterly incomprehensible and non-existent.
by NewCorkSeth » 10 Aug 2019 16:14
10 Aug 2019 16:14First impression? Yes.BR0B0T wrote:was that a pen?
listening on radio
by Libertine » 10 Aug 2019 16:15
10 Aug 2019 16:15Sure sounds like it could/should have been...BR0B0T wrote:was that a pen?
listening on radio
by PistolPete » 10 Aug 2019 16:15
10 Aug 2019 16:15Ah, ok. Makes sense. (not the Pele bit!)10539.4 Miles Away wrote:Sorry mate, can't link it as I live in Oz and so watching the official stream and they are very good at shutting down multiple sign ins / stream shares.PistolPete wrote:Can you DM a link to watch? Thanks10539.4 Miles Away wrote:Haven't read the whole thread but have watched the first half online. If you are basing your opinion on Pele on Dellors commentary please please don't. Dellor refusing to call Pele by his name is disgraceful. Pele played like a player who is new to the team and to the pace and style of the game. There is absolutely no way that he is sh1t.
Should he have started? Probably not but please don't let him be our new escapegoat
Why is Dellor refusing to call him Pele? 100% happy to give a guy, bought by Monaco (one of the best in the transfer market) for 10m euros, more of a go
Dellor refusing to call him Pele as "he's not good enough to have that name"
by 3points » 10 Aug 2019 16:16
10 Aug 2019 16:16by Snowflake Royal » 10 Aug 2019 16:17
10 Aug 2019 16:17Diamond with 2 up?NewCorkSeth wrote:Shape in second half is hard to tell tbh. It seems to be a 4-1-2-1-2Snowflake Royal wrote:Anyone actually watching either got a link, or got a description for our shape?
Although having watched the Wednesday match, I'm perfectly willing to believe that our shape is utterly incomprehensible and non-existent.
by windermereROYAL » 10 Aug 2019 16:17
10 Aug 2019 16:17Of course you do know it`s Reading fans we are talking about?Hound wrote:.....45 mins with the new players....
Give them a chance ffs. It will take time
by NewCorkSeth » 10 Aug 2019 16:19
10 Aug 2019 16:19First half same as Sheffield Wednesday.Snowflake Royal wrote:Diamond with 2 up?NewCorkSeth wrote:Shape in second half is hard to tell tbh. It seems to be a 4-1-2-1-2Snowflake Royal wrote:Anyone actually watching either got a link, or got a description for our shape?
Although having watched the Wednesday match, I'm perfectly willing to believe that our shape is utterly incomprehensible and non-existent.
What about first half?
Similar or different to Wednesday?
by Snowflake Royal » 10 Aug 2019 16:21
10 Aug 2019 16:21Nice to see Gomes has a plan.NewCorkSeth wrote:First half same as Sheffield Wednesday.Snowflake Royal wrote:Diamond with 2 up?NewCorkSeth wrote: Shape in second half is hard to tell tbh. It seems to be a 4-1-2-1-2
What about first half?
Similar or different to Wednesday?
Exactly that. Swift back in CM but on the left side, Rinomhota back on the right (he played left CM in first half which was odd)
by NewCorkSeth » 10 Aug 2019 16:22
10 Aug 2019 16:22Joao in the hole probably to hold up the ball and release for Puscas and Meite.Snowflake Royal wrote:Nice to see Gomes has a plan.NewCorkSeth wrote:First half same as Sheffield Wednesday.Snowflake Royal wrote: Diamond with 2 up?
What about first half?
Similar or different to Wednesday?
Exactly that. Swift back in CM but on the left side, Rinomhota back on the right (he played left CM in first half which was odd)
by John Madejski's Wallet » 10 Aug 2019 16:23
10 Aug 2019 16:23Wow. Lots of width thenNewCorkSeth wrote:Shape in second half is hard to tell tbh. It seems to be a 4-1-2-1-2Snowflake Royal wrote:Anyone actually watching either got a link, or got a description for our shape?
Although having watched the Wednesday match, I'm perfectly willing to believe that our shape is utterly incomprehensible and non-existent.
by WoodleyRoyal » 10 Aug 2019 16:24
10 Aug 2019 16:24by NewCorkSeth » 10 Aug 2019 16:24
10 Aug 2019 16:24It's not like we ever do anything with the ball out wide anyway. 1 good cross from Richards. That's all so far.John Madejski's Wallet wrote:Wow. Lots of width thenNewCorkSeth wrote:Shape in second half is hard to tell tbh. It seems to be a 4-1-2-1-2Snowflake Royal wrote:Anyone actually watching either got a link, or got a description for our shape?
Although having watched the Wednesday match, I'm perfectly willing to believe that our shape is utterly incomprehensible and non-existent.
We are so fukking easy to defend against
by NewCorkSeth » 10 Aug 2019 16:25
10 Aug 2019 16:25by BR0B0T » 10 Aug 2019 16:25
10 Aug 2019 16:25by Aeroguide » 10 Aug 2019 16:26
10 Aug 2019 16:26by Libertine » 10 Aug 2019 16:26
10 Aug 2019 16:26by sputnik » 10 Aug 2019 16:26
10 Aug 2019 16:26by sandman » 10 Aug 2019 16:27
10 Aug 2019 16:27You don't rate Meite. Why didn't you say something?URZZZZ wrote:For all the optimism of the squad I’m not sure. Ejaria flatters to deceive, Joao was far behind the pecking order at Wednesday, I don’t rate Meite,Swift blows too hot and cold, Pele struggled badly at Forest, Richards is league one level etc etc. To me, this team is too narrow, and even though Barrow was badly overrated, he was still a different option which I think we lack
Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], Google [Bot], SouthDownsRoyal, tidus_mi2 and 784 guests