This ^NewCorkSeth wrote:Wages. Also I would prefer to sign a deeper midfielder not another box to box mid. Rinomhota has all the attributes to be a great b2b mid and we should be looking to develop that rather than limiting him to a deeper role.
Played well and stayed fit for one season out of four, on huge wages. Don't think that gets him in our top 20 of all time quite honestly.John Smith wrote:In a heartbeat.
Categorically the best midfielder to have ever played for us.
I'd prefer two solid b2bers than 1 deep and 1 b2b. But then I hate seeing a midfielder basically playing half their game as a third CB, it's just the way we play.PistolPete wrote:This ^NewCorkSeth wrote:Wages. Also I would prefer to sign a deeper midfielder not another box to box mid. Rinomhota has all the attributes to be a great b2b mid and we should be looking to develop that rather than limiting him to a deeper role.
Nobody is saying it will happen.One87One wrote:Never going to happen.
He’s a massive wage and we’re busy removing those as best we can. We certainly wouldn’t be adding them to the wage bill, especially those that are rarely fit!
Move on.
Oooh that's risky. Cant say I've seen any team play a 2 man midfield with 2 b2bs before.Snowflake Royal wrote:I'd prefer two solid b2bers than 1 deep and 1 b2b. But then I hate seeing a midfielder basically playing half their game as a third CB, it's just the way we play.PistolPete wrote:This ^NewCorkSeth wrote:Wages. Also I would prefer to sign a deeper midfielder not another box to box mid. Rinomhota has all the attributes to be a great b2b mid and we should be looking to develop that rather than limiting him to a deeper role.
Not too far off the set up that got us 106 really, although Harps was sensible enough to know he needed to do Sidwell’s defensive work for him a lot of the time.NewCorkSeth wrote:Oooh that's risky. Cant say I've seen any team play a 2 man midfield with 2 b2bs before.Snowflake Royal wrote:I'd prefer two solid b2bers than 1 deep and 1 b2b. But then I hate seeing a midfielder basically playing half their game as a third CB, it's just the way we play.PistolPete wrote:
This ^
I mean Baker did it (played deep) last year and still got forward enough to threaten.
Well he’s not on any wage at all atmOne87One wrote:Never going to happen.
He’s a massive wage and we’re busy removing those as best we can. We certainly wouldn’t be adding them to the wage bill, especially those that are rarely fit!
Move on.
When you’ve been around a while you’ll understand how a discussion board works. People talk about the most pointless th8ngs.StellaPlease wrote:Why is this stupid, hypothetical thread still running?
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Bing [Bot], Kev Royal and 48 guests