How’d you work that one out?AthleticoSpizz wrote:Professionals (some from big big clubs on loan) not looking after themselves…more like
Certainly nobody is ‘trying too hard’ and over stretching themselves on the training grounds.
It’s weird tbh
Admittedly, its not saying a lot, though one of those would be even higher if he wasn't away for several games for another competition and they all joined after the start of the season. I don't think highlighting the loan players (who have remained relatively injury free) supports any kind of argument.AthleticoSpizz wrote:Wowee…that”s one high bar![]()
Players out on loan…and all of the reasons for it (them being out on loan) .getting injured/taking time-outs between games….they’ve got to take some responsibility for themselves.
Don’t get me wrong…the whole injury crisis (s) is all a bit strange
On the injuries, I think we’ve always seem to have more than a fair share, but this year really does take the piss.CountryRoyal wrote:Counter-productive over intense training sessions, reported from his time in Chicago and makes sense.Zip wrote:We are getting a good number of soft tissue injuries now. Dann, Hoilett, Azeez, Halilovic, Tetek (I think),.....there seems to be a serious conditioning problem with the players.
This amount of injuries is not a coincidence.
Hendo wrote:On the injuries, I think we’ve always seem to have more than a fair share, but this year really does take the piss.CountryRoyal wrote:Counter-productive over intense training sessions, reported from his time in Chicago and makes sense.Zip wrote:We are getting a good number of soft tissue injuries now. Dann, Hoilett, Azeez, Halilovic, Tetek (I think),.....there seems to be a serious conditioning problem with the players.
This amount of injuries is not a coincidence.
fair enough…butCountryRoyal wrote:Admittedly, its not saying a lot, though one of those would be even higher if he wasn't away for several games for another competition and they all joined after the start of the season. I don't think highlighting the loan players (who have remained relatively injury free) supports any kind of argument.AthleticoSpizz wrote:Wowee…that”s one high bar![]()
Players out on loan…and all of the reasons for it (them being out on loan) .getting injured/taking time-outs between games….they’ve got to take some responsibility for themselves.
Don’t get me wrong…the whole injury crisis (s) is all a bit strange
That's my point about the injury crisis, I don't think it is 'strange' as such. Things don't just happen, it's not just bad luck. Who is to say that it isn't a culmination of an improper training structure, inadequate rest and rehabilitation and misguidance for reintroduction to the team? From where we are, on the outside, it is just conjecture - but in my opinion its far more likely and believable once considering the manager's long-lasting demonstration of inadequacy and incompetence. Even more so when acknowledging his pre-existing reputation, and the reports from Chicago Fire fans.
Hasn't CR just told you twice that our loanees arn't on our sick list much. So why you still talking about them taking responsibility to not be on our sick list.AthleticoSpizz wrote:fair enough…butCountryRoyal wrote:Admittedly, its not saying a lot, though one of those would be even higher if he wasn't away for several games for another competition and they all joined after the start of the season. I don't think highlighting the loan players (who have remained relatively injury free) supports any kind of argument.AthleticoSpizz wrote:Wowee…that”s one high bar![]()
Players out on loan…and all of the reasons for it (them being out on loan) .getting injured/taking time-outs between games….they’ve got to take some responsibility for themselves.
Don’t get me wrong…the whole injury crisis (s) is all a bit strange
That's my point about the injury crisis, I don't think it is 'strange' as such. Things don't just happen, it's not just bad luck. Who is to say that it isn't a culmination of an improper training structure, inadequate rest and rehabilitation and misguidance for reintroduction to the team? From where we are, on the outside, it is just conjecture - but in my opinion its far more likely and believable once considering the manager's long-lasting demonstration of inadequacy and incompetence. Even more so when acknowledging his pre-existing reputation, and the reports from Chicago Fire fans.
Players on loan from big BIG. clubs who know how to look after themselves, playing one week, then not the other is strange.
With the exception of Andy Carroll (who has been the exception in sick-bay terms) what have these other loanees going to gain from their times on our sick-list?
It’s weird, but a I think that the problem (and their ‘play one week/take next week off’ attitudes’) lies a lot with the players themselves.
Okay Ian calm down you sad post leeching fukk, maybe I am confusing ‘signings’ with loanee signings…go easy on me…it’s been (being) a long season…don’t really know who is ours and who is not…nor do I really care right now.Snowflake Royal wrote:Hasn't CR just told you twice that our loanees arn't on our sick list much. So why you still talking about them taking responsibility to not be on our sick list.AthleticoSpizz wrote:fair enough…butCountryRoyal wrote:
Admittedly, its not saying a lot, though one of those would be even higher if he wasn't away for several games for another competition and they all joined after the start of the season. I don't think highlighting the loan players (who have remained relatively injury free) supports any kind of argument.
That's my point about the injury crisis, I don't think it is 'strange' as such. Things don't just happen, it's not just bad luck. Who is to say that it isn't a culmination of an improper training structure, inadequate rest and rehabilitation and misguidance for reintroduction to the team? From where we are, on the outside, it is just conjecture - but in my opinion its far more likely and believable once considering the manager's long-lasting demonstration of inadequacy and incompetence. Even more so when acknowledging his pre-existing reputation, and the reports from Chicago Fire fans.
Players on loan from big BIG. clubs who know how to look after themselves, playing one week, then not the other is strange.
With the exception of Andy Carroll (who has been the exception in sick-bay terms) what have these other loanees going to gain from their times on our sick-list?
It’s weird, but a I think that the problem (and their ‘play one week/take next week off’ attitudes’) lies a lot with the players themselves.
nice reaction. Had a few have we?AthleticoSpizz wrote:Okay Ian calm down you sad post leeching fukk, maybe I am confusing ‘signings’ with loanee signings…go easy on me…it’s been (being) a long season…don’t really know who is ours and who is not…nor do I really care right now.Snowflake Royal wrote:Hasn't CR just told you twice that our loanees arn't on our sick list much. So why you still talking about them taking responsibility to not be on our sick list.AthleticoSpizz wrote:fair enough…but
Players on loan from big BIG. clubs who know how to look after themselves, playing one week, then not the other is strange.
With the exception of Andy Carroll (who has been the exception in sick-bay terms) what have these other loanees going to gain from their times on our sick-list?
It’s weird, but a I think that the problem (and their ‘play one week/take next week off’ attitudes’) lies a lot with the players themselves.
You mean rentboy?AthleticoSpizz wrote:Ho…a crossover of an edit, sentiment remains the same
DDs all yours on other threads to bicker with runtboy
I would presume that the owners are screwed by the ffp issues as they’d need to pay off the management team (Pauno and Mitrovic) to start with and doing that may well give issues further down the line with player contracts etc.Simmops wrote:Is it a case of we genuinely can't afford it?
Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot], dave the magic moron, Google [Bot] and 71 guests