Agreed on Little and Upson and Murray.Whore Jackie wrote:Little was really average on his loan spell. He even admitted as much at the FPA night last year. No doubting his pedigree once he signed mind.Hendo wrote:2 best loan signings were:WoodleyRoyal wrote:last good loan? probably Steve Blatherwick
Matthew Upson
Glen Little
Upson was different class. Upson and Glenn Murray have been arguably the two best loan players we never signed.
Totally forgot about Bertrand, he was very good.leon wrote:Agreed on Little and Upson and Murray.Whore Jackie wrote:Little was really average on his loan spell. He even admitted as much at the FPA night last year. No doubting his pedigree once he signed mind.Hendo wrote:
2 best loan signings were:
Matthew Upson
Glen Little
Upson was different class. Upson and Glenn Murray have been arguably the two best loan players we never signed.
No sure anyone's mentioned Ryan Bertrand - who was excellent. He came 3rd in player of the season behind Gylfi and Kebe. Which demonstrates how good he was.
These days they are incredibly few true wingers left anywhere. You certainly struggle to find ones who can beat a man with skill rather than just pace, and very few can put in a decent cross while running.Coppells Lost Coat wrote:So it points towards getting in players with clever movement and the ability to carve up opponents. Rather than using classic wing play of stretching the play, beating your man and putting a ball into the box.
Barrow can beat players using pace but thats about it.
True.tmesis wrote:The days of a genuine wide man like Glen Little, able to turn the fullback to get half a yard of space to put a cross in, or even a Michael Gilkes who, while mainly about speed, could be relied on to arc a ball into the Tilehurst End with regularity, are gone.
Have thought Barrow would be great in the 2 in a 3-5-2 formationSnowflake Royal wrote:Putting Barrow at No 10 is something I've thought about and suggested for a while, though less so since he's been rubbish this season.
It'd get him out of most of the defensive duty in our half he doesn't do anyway.
Our midfield can’t do much about Mannone letting a shot under his body. McShane lunging in to concede two pens in the same match, the hopeless confusion between Moore and Ilori allowing a Norwich player ( I think it was Norwich) to run through and score, the complete failure of Ilori to position him properly time and time again and for goals to be regularly conceded from corners because neither of our centre half’s or keeper can command the six yard box.paultheroyal wrote:Some sense and realism at last.leon wrote:I would say midfield is absolutely our biggest problem this season. It cant stop the opposition and can’t create.Zip wrote:
The options have been poor. Rinomhota has improved things but Swift remains an enigma. Will we see Ezatolahi play for us again? For now this looks our strongest midfield if all three are available.
Nothing sums up our midfield more than the erratic performances of Leandro Bacuna. His passing is so inconsistent. Every game he mixes good passes with dreadful ones. Kelly has shown a better attitude in recent appearances. He has at least worked harder but lacks creativity.
It says an awful lot that our mediocre midfield has been the least of our problems this season.
Yeah defence has been shit but if you’re a full back trying to defend against two players when the guy in front of you is doing fcuk all or a centre back constantly having midfielders running at you through the central midfield unmolested you’re going to struggle.
No one bar Rinomhota can do their job properly.
Edit: so maybe we’re replacing Swift and Kelly with these lads.
Agree. Only through trends in formation though. When 442 becomes trendy again we'll see decent wide players.tmesis wrote:These days they are incredibly few true wingers left anywhere. You certainly struggle to find ones who can beat a man with skill rather than just pace, and very few can put in a decent cross while running.Coppells Lost Coat wrote:So it points towards getting in players with clever movement and the ability to carve up opponents. Rather than using classic wing play of stretching the play, beating your man and putting a ball into the box.
Barrow can beat players using pace but thats about it.
The days of a genuine wide man like Glen Little, able to turn the fullback to get half a yard of space to put a cross in, or even a Michael Gilkes who, while mainly about speed, could be relied on to arc a ball to the far post with regularity, are gone.
The problem is that doing that, in itself, won't work. The way we've put pace on a pedestal in this country means that we've now got loads of very quick wide midfielders favoured for their ability to run past a defender, not for their ability to put a decent cross in, let alone a cross while running.Coppells Lost Coat wrote:Agree. Only through trends in formation though. When 442 becomes trendy again we'll see decent wide players.tmesis wrote:These days they are incredibly few true wingers left anywhere. You certainly struggle to find ones who can beat a man with skill rather than just pace, and very few can put in a decent cross while running.Coppells Lost Coat wrote:So it points towards getting in players with clever movement and the ability to carve up opponents. Rather than using classic wing play of stretching the play, beating your man and putting a ball into the box.
Barrow can beat players using pace but thats about it.
The days of a genuine wide man like Glen Little, able to turn the fullback to get half a yard of space to put a cross in, or even a Michael Gilkes who, while mainly about speed, could be relied on to arc a ball to the far post with regularity, are gone.
Also much easier to put a CF with pace out on the wing to suit what the manager wants than bringing in a new player.
That's because its over 40 games since we have come from behind and won and in those 40 games we have only come back 8 times to draw......Hound wrote:Fair - been pretty rubbish in all positions. Mentally been horribly weak as well
Can barely remember a game when we’ve got anything after going 1 down
BECAUSE IT AIN’T lEON.leon wrote:WHY IS THIS THREAD NOT CONFRIMRED?
Threads were merged.leon wrote:WHY IS THIS THREAD NOT CONFRIMRED?
Because there is no such word.leon wrote:WHY IS THIS THREAD NOT CONFRIMRED?
Bertrand - why does everyone forget him? Best loan we ever had.Victor Meldrew wrote:Some decent loans from Chelsea previously in Chalobah, Ake and the unforgettable David Lee but then we also had Piazon.
Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], Bing [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], tidus_mi2 and 119 guests