Grow up Genome.genome wrote:Anyone else remember when we technically won after being 6-1 down at half time against Norwich?
Grow up Genome.genome wrote:Anyone else remember when we technically won after being 6-1 down at half time against Norwich?
I used to think my favourite ever game at the Mad Stad was when we came back to beat Wigan in the play off semi final, but just found out technically we lost the game 1-0....Jagermesiter1871 wrote:Remember when we beat Arsenal in the cup, until we didn't and they won? We won, technically.Old Man Andrews wrote:We were about to until Baldock scored. I was technically correct.Barney wrote:
Talking of stupid comments, remind us who said "100% Reading will lose to Forest" ? 100%.
Old Man Andrews wrote:Grow up Genome.genome wrote:Anyone else remember when we technically won after being 6-1 down at half time against Norwich?

Look you got owned the other day by people because you tried to get a rise out of others, don't let it happen again.genome wrote:Old Man Andrews wrote:Grow up Genome.genome wrote:Anyone else remember when we technically won after being 6-1 down at half time against Norwich?
It Thursday morning, its such a nothing day. I will come up with some new material, apologies.Platypuss wrote:Desperate stuff from OMA.
Schtick looking v tired now.
Time to give it a rest?
You are seriously in need of helpOld Man Andrews wrote:Leeds are the best side in the division, well said.Franchise FC wrote:I've been racking my brain to find a reason, any reason, why you might be 'technically' correct.Old Man Andrews wrote: We were about to until Baldock scored. I was technically correct.
Not seeing it yet.
According to you, Leeds are the best side in the division despite the fact that they are not top. You claim that you can only judge when the competition is over. In which case, you can only judge whether we lost in a particular game when the game is over.
You appear to be moving the goalposts out of the stadium and into the next county.
I've broken my New Year's Resolution - and you're right to point it out - my apologiesWoodleyRoyal wrote:You must be new here, this is OMA.Franchise FC wrote:I've been racking my brain to find a reason, any reason, why you might be 'technically' correct.Old Man Andrews wrote: We were about to until Baldock scored. I was technically correct.
Not seeing it yet.
According to you, Leeds are the best side in the division despite the fact that they are not top. You claim that you can only judge when the competition is over. In which case, you can only judge whether we lost in a particular game when the game is over.
You appear to be moving the goalposts out of the stadium and into the next county.
I don't understand why it is so hard for you to accept other people have different opinions to you, it shows a lack of intelligence to be honest.Franchise FC wrote:You are seriously in need of helpOld Man Andrews wrote:Leeds are the best side in the division, well said.Franchise FC wrote: I've been racking my brain to find a reason, any reason, why you might be 'technically' correct.
Not seeing it yet.
According to you, Leeds are the best side in the division despite the fact that they are not top. You claim that you can only judge when the competition is over. In which case, you can only judge whether we lost in a particular game when the game is over.
You appear to be moving the goalposts out of the stadium and into the next county.
Sit down before you hurt yourself
Corrected for youOld Man Andrews wrote:I don't understand why it is so hard for me to accept other people have different opinions to me, it shows a lack of intelligence to be honest.Franchise FC wrote:You are seriously in need of helpOld Man Andrews wrote: Leeds are the best side in the division, well said.
Sit down before you hurt yourself
Are you actually an adult? You have serious issues. Football is all about opinions, you sadly cannot recognise that.Franchise FC wrote:Corrected for youOld Man Andrews wrote:I don't understand why it is so hard for me to accept other people have different opinions to me, it shows a lack of intelligence to be honest.Franchise FC wrote: You are seriously in need of help
Sit down before you hurt yourself
I am out of the dating scene now, I have a regular partner now which is nowhere near as much fun.LUX wrote:OMA, stick to telling us about your blind d8s off of off the internet. I enjoyed the story about that one in Andover or (something).
Anyone else remember when technically OMA was not a tedious boring biffkin who ruined every thread?genome wrote:Anyone else remember when we technically won after being 6-1 down at half time against Norwich?
Platypuss wrote:Desperate stuff from OMA.
Schtick looking v tired now.
Time to give it a rest?
No, he made a tongue in cheek comment about a team well above us in the league and it went over your head.Old Man Andrews wrote:Be quiet Ian, not interested in hearing your opinion on anything.Snowflake Royal wrote:Interesting way of standing up for yourself and defending being bullied.Old Man Andrews wrote: You're so dull and deluded....
He made a stupid comment about a team well above us in the league and you have defended it. Sums you up.
Tbh I honestly don't.Simmops wrote:Anyone else remember when technically OMA was not a tedious boring biffkin who ruined every thread?genome wrote:Anyone else remember when we technically won after being 6-1 down at half time against Norwich?
And you can cut your yap too.Simmops wrote:Anyone else remember when technically OMA was not a tedious boring biffkin who ruined every thread?genome wrote:Anyone else remember when we technically won after being 6-1 down at half time against Norwich?
Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot], Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 68 guests