The issue with Richards wasn't so much that we couldn’t offer him a contract, but that he went from being no better than Blackett or Obita (?) so there was no reason to offer him a multi-year deal, to looking like he could be a PL player within 6 months, by which time he had no reason to sign a contract, because he could just sign a pre-deal with a European side.WestYorksRoyal wrote:The example I remember at the time was not being able to offer a new contract to Richards and losing him for free; that's £5m transfer revenue lost at least.
But it was around the time Dai was blocking sensible sales for Moore, Loader and Swift. Perhaps the result would have just been we'd have been locked into a higher wage contract with him?
That is interesting. Would love to know what that lowest expenditure figure actually is. And who has the highest expenditure.Clyde1998 wrote:Very happy with the academy situation, but noted we lost a lot of players throughout the latter Dai years. Apparently we have the lowest Category One expenditure, but the eighth best productivity (not specified what that meant specifically though).
Burnley are also in that list - twenty-nine clubs this season.Whore Jackie wrote:That is interesting. Would love to know what that lowest expenditure figure actually is. And who has the highest expenditure.Clyde1998 wrote:Very happy with the academy situation, but noted we lost a lot of players throughout the latter Dai years. Apparently we have the lowest Category One expenditure, but the eighth best productivity (not specified what that meant specifically though).
Think this is complete list of Category One Academies:
Arsenal, Aston Villa, Birmingham, Blackburn, Brighton, Chelsea, Crystal Palace, Derby, Everton, Fulham, Ipswich, Leeds, Leicester, Liverpool, Manchester City, Manchester United, Middlesbrough, Newcastle, Norwich, Nottingham Forest, Reading, Southampton, Stoke, Sunderland, Tottenham, West Brom, West Ham, Wolves
So 8/28. Kudos to Gilksey and co.
Rick Catania joins Board of Directors
Further addition to the Board of Directors.
Reading Football Club is pleased to announce that Rick Catania has been named on the Board of Directors.
Rick Catania is the President of HC Sports Ventures, based in Midland, Texas. The firm has acquired a minority stake in Dogwood Football LLC, the ultimate controlling company of Reading Football Club.
A fifth-generation ranch owner and operator, Rick has been approved by the EFL to serve as a director of the Club. A former collegiate soccer player, he has since built a diverse career as a rancher, investor, and foundation chair. He brings a unique blend of experience, youthful energy, and deep passion for football to the Board.
Royals Chairman, Rob Couhig said:
“We’re thrilled to welcome Rick to the Reading Board. His passion for the game, combined with his energy, vision and business acumen, will add real strength to our leadership team. Rick understands the importance of community and tradition, but he also shares our ambition for the future. Together, we will continue working to build a club that our fans can be proud of for generations to come.”
Rick Catania said:
“Joining the Reading Board alongside Rob, Todd, Ross, and Alec is an absolute honour. Reading holds a special place in my family’s story, as my cousin met her soon-to-be husband while studying at the University of Reading. The community here is remarkable and deserves a club they can be proud of. For a club to exist for more than 150 years is no small achievement, and it is a testament to the unwavering support of its fanbase. My sincere goal is to help ensure that Reading will be a strong and successful football club for the next 150 years.”
We could have rodeos during the half time entertainment. The trouble atm is the football isn’t living up to the razzmatazz.JedMaxwell wrote:Slight Robbie Keane vibes in his statement.
However I will give him a chance - no one seems to know too much about him so we'll just have to wait and see how his involvement pans out. I hope he doesn't turn up in a pair of cowboy boots with a big belt buckle though.
The football itself will always be the bottom line, so they can do all the naff fireworks they like but unless the 'product' improves they will struggle to get the attendances up.blythspartan wrote:We could have rodeos during the half time entertainment. The trouble atm is the football isn’t living up to the razzmatazz.JedMaxwell wrote:Slight Robbie Keane vibes in his statement.
However I will give him a chance - no one seems to know too much about him so we'll just have to wait and see how his involvement pans out. I hope he doesn't turn up in a pair of cowboy boots with a big belt buckle though.
I believe the academy expenditure (and womens team expenditure) is excluded from Profit & Sustainability calculations, so there is a benefit to allocating a higher share of costs to this than is actually received, be that half the cost of the physio team and facilities such as most of the training ground running costs.Clyde1998 wrote:Academy funding is very opaque
The rules vary by level, so what may be true for most Cat one Academies (PL, or a lesser extent Champ) won’t necessarily apply in L1.Forbury Lion wrote:I believe the academy expenditure (and womens team expenditure) is excluded from Profit & Sustainability calculations, so there is a benefit to allocating a higher share of costs to this than is actually received, be that half the cost of the physio team and facilities such as most of the training ground running costs.Clyde1998 wrote:Academy funding is very opaque
On an episode of the Price of Football podcast, Kieran Maguire, the football finance version of Martin Lewis explained this with confirmation from the secret academy director.
This will undoubtedly be the case for any team which is spending big or looking to sell the club on in the future to new owners as it will give them more flexibility to spend big if the past 3 seasons spend has been under-reported in such a way.
There are also tax breaks available for classing things as research and development, football clubs are doing this for research and development of player related things
Sounds like a made up name.Sutekh wrote:Welcome to Rick Catania
On the other hand, we haven't lost to Stockport yet, and a draw or win against them would have us DDWLWD/W.WestYorksRoyal wrote:Rob Couhig hosting fan Q&A next Thursday. Will be interesting to see what he says about the start to the season and Hunt; hard to sugar coat after 9 games.
He might agree with you, but I expect fan discontent is one of the reasons he's doing this. And it's not just the table and results. There's genuinely not loads of enthusiasm, attendances remain low, the football isn't exciting. There's basically been no honeymoon.Snowflake Royal wrote:On the other hand, we haven't lost to Stockport yet, and a draw or win against them would have us DDWLWD/W.WestYorksRoyal wrote:Rob Couhig hosting fan Q&A next Thursday. Will be interesting to see what he says about the start to the season and Hunt; hard to sugar coat after 9 games.
Even a defeat is DDWLWL.
Those first three games are big problem, but I think they've really dictated opinions too much.
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Amazon [Bot], Bing [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], rocketredroyal and 33 guests