Sutekh wrote:Not sure if posted anywhere else as yet but below is Rob’s latest Q&A:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N5npTmb4ths
Sutekh wrote:Not sure if posted anywhere else as yet but below is Rob’s latest Q&A:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N5npTmb4ths
There is no perfect system, however, this exists in American sport particularly in Baseball and just sees the ‘poorer’ billionaires who don’t want to spend much pocketing millions of dollars of the richer teams money. It’d probably work in football briefly but in the long term it has shown to be a disincentive and bad for player wages.Sutekh wrote:So, following on from Rob’s chat with Darragh MacAnthony it seems the L1 owners have got together and written to Rick Parry about how to “improve” the Football League fair play system. Plans suggested are to set every club in a division with the same playing budget and if clubs break it they then will have to pay a “luxury” tax into a pot which is then distributed equally amongst the other clubs in that division the following season. Seems to me a decent idea (and something to change to from the stupid financial rules we have currently) and it appears to have the buy in of many of the L1 owners so presume it will be fully fleshed out and put up for approval at the next AGM.
Sure Darragh said the players/PFA were also involved or had had some input and he felt they were broadly on board with it as they’d rather have clubs that weren’t looking over their shoulders every month and could pay wages on time.Royal Ginger wrote:There is no perfect system, however, this exists in American sport particularly in Baseball and just sees the ‘poorer’ billionaires who don’t want to spend much pocketing millions of dollars of the richer teams money. It’d probably work in football briefly but in the long term it has shown to be a disincentive and bad for player wages.Sutekh wrote:So, following on from Rob’s chat with Darragh MacAnthony it seems the L1 owners have got together and written to Rick Parry about how to “improve” the Football League fair play system. Plans suggested are to set every club in a division with the same playing budget and if clubs break it they then will have to pay a “luxury” tax into a pot which is then distributed equally amongst the other clubs in that division the following season. Seems to me a decent idea (and something to change to from the stupid financial rules we have currently) and it appears to have the buy in of many of the L1 owners so presume it will be fully fleshed out and put up for approval at the next AGM.
Possibly bad for bog-standard players' wages (is that a bad thing?). The better players can and will still be very well paid IMO.Royal Ginger wrote:There is no perfect system, however, this exists in American sport particularly in Baseball and just sees the ‘poorer’ billionaires who don’t want to spend much pocketing millions of dollars of the richer teams money. It’d probably work in football briefly but in the long term it has shown to be a disincentive and bad for player wages.Sutekh wrote:So, following on from Rob’s chat with Darragh MacAnthony it seems the L1 owners have got together and written to Rick Parry about how to “improve” the Football League fair play system. Plans suggested are to set every club in a division with the same playing budget and if clubs break it they then will have to pay a “luxury” tax into a pot which is then distributed equally amongst the other clubs in that division the following season. Seems to me a decent idea (and something to change to from the stupid financial rules we have currently) and it appears to have the buy in of many of the L1 owners so presume it will be fully fleshed out and put up for approval at the next AGM.
And that is guaranteed comp. They can also earn plenty from endorsements etc. That's not too shabby IMO and would perhaps help restore some financial sanity to our game.The most recent reported median total remuneration (guaranteed compensation) for a Major League Soccer (MLS) player was $338,347 as of the September 2025 data release.
Whether or not people view it as hypocrisy (i'm certainly no great fan of the US Republican movement), I think it's a great idea. He and Darragh MacAnthony have established a L1 owners group (I think there's only one or two who haven't joined) and the proposal is about stopping clubs going to the wall when owners try to buy success/promotion and subsequently fail/lose interest. They want to establish a more level playing field where promotion is earned through coaching success and development of players, together with the development of a club's business off the pitch, rather than the pure financial clout of some wealthy owners.Linden Jones' Tash wrote:https://www.theguardian.com/football/2025/nov/14/league-one-clubs-salary-cap-luxury-tax-snubbed-efl?CMP=Share_AndroidApp_Other
Says here that RC is pushing for a salary cap and luxury tax...
I thought American Republicans despised socialism...
I guess they embrace it when it's their own money being spent...
Oh the sweet irony....
I never said its not a good idea....RoyalBlue wrote:Whether or not people view it as hypocrisy (i'm certainly no great fan of the US Republican movement), I think it's a great idea. He and Darragh MacAnthony have established a L1 owners group (I think there's only one or two who haven't joined) and the proposal is about stopping clubs going to the wall when owners try to buy success/promotion and subsequently fail/lose interest. They want to establish a more level playing field where promotion is earned through coaching success and development of players, together with the development of a club's business off the pitch, rather than the pure financial clout of some wealthy owners.Linden Jones' Tash wrote:https://www.theguardian.com/football/2025/nov/14/league-one-clubs-salary-cap-luxury-tax-snubbed-efl?CMP=Share_AndroidApp_Other
Says here that RC is pushing for a salary cap and luxury tax...
I thought American Republicans despised socialism...
I guess they embrace it when it's their own money being spent...
Oh the sweet irony....
That's just Republicanism isn’t it... what gives me the best outcome?Linden Jones' Tash wrote:I never said its not a good idea....RoyalBlue wrote:Whether or not people view it as hypocrisy (i'm certainly no great fan of the US Republican movement), I think it's a great idea. He and Darragh MacAnthony have established a L1 owners group (I think there's only one or two who haven't joined) and the proposal is about stopping clubs going to the wall when owners try to buy success/promotion and subsequently fail/lose interest. They want to establish a more level playing field where promotion is earned through coaching success and development of players, together with the development of a club's business off the pitch, rather than the pure financial clout of some wealthy owners.Linden Jones' Tash wrote:https://www.theguardian.com/football/2025/nov/14/league-one-clubs-salary-cap-luxury-tax-snubbed-efl?CMP=Share_AndroidApp_Other
Says here that RC is pushing for a salary cap and luxury tax...
I thought American Republicans despised socialism...
I guess they embrace it when it's their own money being spent...
Oh the sweet irony....
Just seems self serving to be embracing socialist ideals to avoid investing/losing too much money...
I don't think the specific proposal is the best idea - a combination of the SCMP rules (ie. a share of revenue) with a luxury tax would be better personally. I feel having a fixed salary cap would essentially remove any incentive for clubs to grow their revenue.RoyalBlue wrote:Whether or not people view it as hypocrisy (i'm certainly no great fan of the US Republican movement), I think it's a great idea. He and Darragh MacAnthony have established a L1 owners group (I think there's only one or two who haven't joined) and the proposal is about stopping clubs going to the wall when owners try to buy success/promotion and subsequently fail/lose interest. They want to establish a more level playing field where promotion is earned through coaching success and development of players, together with the development of a club's business off the pitch, rather than the pure financial clout of some wealthy owners.Linden Jones' Tash wrote:https://www.theguardian.com/football/2025/nov/14/league-one-clubs-salary-cap-luxury-tax-snubbed-efl?CMP=Share_AndroidApp_Other
Says here that RC is pushing for a salary cap and luxury tax...
I thought American Republicans despised socialism...
I guess they embrace it when it's their own money being spent...
Oh the sweet irony....
That’s exactly why Couhig, Mcanthony and the others want it though. They want it to be an “owners league” rather than a league run by administrators telling them what they can and can’t do with their clubs/businesses.Royal Ginger wrote:This salary cap crap has been bad for sport in the US. The strongest player’s union is Major League Baseball’s and they’ve been fighting against it tooth and nail for years.
Ask who wants it? It’s the millionaire/billionaire owners. It’s not about competitive balance (which it’s absolutely not achieved), it’s about the rich getting richer.
I don’t doubt that there’s a problem in the EFL but this sh*t isn’t the answer.
[It] is not surprising if we observe that the best players tend to command the highest wages. The importance of the insight from contest theory is that it is not absolute spending that determines performance, but spending relative to one's rivals.
On average, the Spanish teams were 12 places above their profit maximizing position over the sample period, but less than half a place below their win maximizing position. Similarly, the English teams are nearly 16 places above their profit maximizing position, but nearly four places below their win maximizing position.
Of course, profit maximization and win maximization subject to a zero profit constraint are just two points along a spectrum of possible objectives. Clearly, however, the evidence suggests that the behaviour of clubs in our sample conforms quite closely to short run win maximization.
Perhaps the most interesting result is that the historical status variable has a negative rather than positive coefficient, suggesting that past performance is a substitute for current performance. This makes some sense, since teams that have never experienced success may become desperate to meet the demand of the fans. We also find that teams facing relegation risk tend to increase their spending relative to the profit maximizing position. The fact that teams struggling for promotion and against relegation display a more substantial willingness to buy performance improvements is quite intuitive.
Some examples (actual average position over period / win maximisation average position / profit maximisation average position):If clubs were truly profit maximizers, they might be expected to collude in order to reduce competition (competition, in this case, amounts to little more than business stealing). Collusive conduct appears characteristic of the closed U.S. major leagues, given that restraints such as salary caps and revenue sharing limit economic competition and help to generate financial surpluses. Clubs in European leagues have been noticeably unsuccessful at negotiating similar restraints.
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Amazon [Bot], Baidu [Spider], Google Adsense [Bot], Sutekh and 133 guests