Checked who scored and I must have misread / misremembered as he's been CB at Oxford all season.Snowflake Royal wrote:Thought he got converted to RB when he moved.Stranded wrote:Isn't Dickie a towering centre back though?Snowflake Royal wrote:Well, we may be looking for a right back. though Osho's doing ok.
He could definitely play there ok.
I hope not I would rather raid the free transfer market and look at the lower leagues. The odd 1 or 2 loans is ok but it very rarely will get you promoted. we need to build and develop and get a team that wants to play for reading not Chelsea etc and this is a stepping stone. we develop them get nothing for it and if we want them still have to buy them it is not great business sense especially where FFP is involved.From Despair To Where? wrote:Selling Moore may end up paying for Ejaria, if we go through with that.
Even with selling Moore, a DM would be a more pressing need because our midfield is shapeless without one.
I think we will be leaning heavily on the loan market again next season.
But what will happen to FFP rules in a Covid world? Clubs are going to lose ticket revenue for a year or so, so surely the measures have to be relaxed? If not, rules will have to come in and force players into salary cuts. Obviously I'd disagree with wealthy owners using the relaxing of FFP to bankroll expensive squads - that would go against the principles of any Covid related relaxation. But I can't see how the rules can stay as they are.From Despair To Where? wrote:We are hardly out of the woods with FFP even with the players leaving this summer so we still don't have much wriggle room. We may knock £100,000 a week off the wagebill with departures but that's only £5m a season for a club currently losing over 3 times that annually. We lost £18m last year and IIRC, £13m the year before and that's with flogging the stadium for £26m. FFP allows for a rolling £13m annual average loss over 3 years so even with this year discounted, it doesn't need a maths genius to work out we are still on the edge before we bring anyone in.
I don't see us bringing in more than 4 or 5 players. I think we absolutely need a DM and maybe another wide player but I honestly think any more than that will be loans or on a one out, one in basis.
My point is, if we can only afford losses of £7m next season, how could the EFL possibly punish us for going over when we have no ticket revenue? Meeting the target is nigh on impossible.From Despair To Where? wrote:But whether the rules are relaxed or not, we have already accounted for £32m of the permitted £39m loses in two of the three years. Short of scrapping FFP all together, post Covid changes will not alter that. Assuming nothing changed, we were already looking at having to reduce costs by £220,000 a week to comply if income streams remained the same. Covid doesn't change that and it doesn't alter the fact that our wage bill was already accounting for 211% of our revenue.
All I'm trying to say is don't expect many incoming players this summer and don't expect to see us paying a fee unless someone is sold first.
But my arguement is that regardless of FFP regulations or income, our wage bill is still far too high and it is a cycle that has been blighting us and holding us back for 7 years. Knock £150,000 a week off our wage bill and it's still accounting for 140-150% of our income in normal circumstances. Whatever adjustments are made to FFP to account for Covid will not alter that.WestYorksRoyal wrote:My point is, if we can only afford losses of £7m next season, how could the EFL possibly punish us for going over when we have no ticket revenue? Meeting the target is nigh on impossible.From Despair To Where? wrote:But whether the rules are relaxed or not, we have already accounted for £32m of the permitted £39m loses in two of the three years. Short of scrapping FFP all together, post Covid changes will not alter that. Assuming nothing changed, we were already looking at having to reduce costs by £220,000 a week to comply if income streams remained the same. Covid doesn't change that and it doesn't alter the fact that our wage bill was already accounting for 211% of our revenue.
All I'm trying to say is don't expect many incoming players this summer and don't expect to see us paying a fee unless someone is sold first.
I'm not sure what the solution is, but FFP can't continue on the same basis.
We all know it will fall. The point is we're going to have to sell good players and find buyers for shit players still under contract to get it fall to anything remotely sustainable, not just let ooc players go.WestYorksRoyal wrote:The wage bill will fall. McCleary, Gunter, Poland, Mannone and most likely Barrow leaving will ensure that. I guess the main difference with FFP wiggle room will be in transfer fees.
Dickie is a good example. He's captained Oxford to the play off final and could well command a decent fee. Under normal FFP rules, it could be beyond us. But in terms of wages, he wouldn't be close to Guntet, for example, not even considering a scenario where he ends up being a replacement for Moore. He's the sort of signing we may be able to afford with more flexibility. But the days of ex-PL journeymen on £20k+ a week will surely have to end either way.
Get a decent fee for Swift and sell on Moore for £2m or so, which should be feasible, and the only Gourlay contracts you're left with are Meite and Aluko. Meite is worth keeping, and who knows, maybe we can flog off Aluko.Snowflake Royal wrote:We all know it will fall. The point is we're going to have to sell good players and find buyers for shit players still under contract to get it fall to anything remotely sustainable, not just let ooc players go.WestYorksRoyal wrote:The wage bill will fall. McCleary, Gunter, Poland, Mannone and most likely Barrow leaving will ensure that. I guess the main difference with FFP wiggle room will be in transfer fees.
Dickie is a good example. He's captained Oxford to the play off final and could well command a decent fee. Under normal FFP rules, it could be beyond us. But in terms of wages, he wouldn't be close to Guntet, for example, not even considering a scenario where he ends up being a replacement for Moore. He's the sort of signing we may be able to afford with more flexibility. But the days of ex-PL journeymen on £20k+ a week will surely have to end either way.
Moore probably costs us as much if not more than all the Academy players already released for example.
We don't have the highest absolute wagebill but In terms of as a percentage of income, it is by someway, the highest in the league.SouthDownsRoyal wrote:Interesting thread, cheers guys.
Do we have any way of knowing where we are compared with other championship clubs with regards to our wage bill?
I agree the days if the ex premiership journey men must now be over which I think is positive.
I know Kitson, Doyle, Long were taken from lower leagues and repaid us massively with what they achieved but also appreciate it’s easier said that done to just go down he leagues and cherry pick cheap options that will success in the championship but that and some youth players seems a sound way to progress. But of course it does mean some risk and also a possible longer time frame for success, possibly,
211% of income.WestYorksRoyal wrote:Get a decent fee for Swift and sell on Moore for £2m or so, which should be feasible, and the only Gourlay contracts you're left with are Meite and Aluko. Meite is worth keeping, and who knows, maybe we can flog off Aluko.Snowflake Royal wrote:We all know it will fall. The point is we're going to have to sell good players and find buyers for shit players still under contract to get it fall to anything remotely sustainable, not just let ooc players go.WestYorksRoyal wrote:The wage bill will fall. McCleary, Gunter, Poland, Mannone and most likely Barrow leaving will ensure that. I guess the main difference with FFP wiggle room will be in transfer fees.
Dickie is a good example. He's captained Oxford to the play off final and could well command a decent fee. Under normal FFP rules, it could be beyond us. But in terms of wages, he wouldn't be close to Guntet, for example, not even considering a scenario where he ends up being a replacement for Moore. He's the sort of signing we may be able to afford with more flexibility. But the days of ex-PL journeymen on £20k+ a week will surely have to end either way.
Moore probably costs us as much if not more than all the Academy players already released for example.
It's not as dire as you say
Highest ever percentage in tier 2 I thinkFrom Despair To Where? wrote:We don't have the highest absolute wagebill but In terms of as a percentage of income, it is by someway, the highest in the league.SouthDownsRoyal wrote:Interesting thread, cheers guys.
Do we have any way of knowing where we are compared with other championship clubs with regards to our wage bill?
I agree the days if the ex premiership journey men must now be over which I think is positive.
I know Kitson, Doyle, Long were taken from lower leagues and repaid us massively with what they achieved but also appreciate it’s easier said that done to just go down he leagues and cherry pick cheap options that will success in the championship but that and some youth players seems a sound way to progress. But of course it does mean some risk and also a possible longer time frame for success, possibly,
Poland? No wonder it’s high if Reading are paying the wages of everyone over there not to mention the disappointment with the lack of talent coming through. Get them off the books the club can probably sign Miazga and Pele.WestYorksRoyal wrote:The wage bill will fall. McCleary, Gunter, Poland, Mannone and most likely Barrow leaving will ensure that. I guess the main difference with FFP wiggle room will be in transfer fees.
Dickie is a good example. He's captained Oxford to the play off final and could well command a decent fee. Under normal FFP rules, it could be beyond us. But in terms of wages, he wouldn't be close to Guntet, for example, not even considering a scenario where he ends up being a replacement for Moore. He's the sort of signing we may be able to afford with more flexibility. But the days of ex-PL journeymen on £20k+ a week will surely have to end either way.
Anyone got any recent stats?From Despair To Where? wrote:We don't have the highest absolute wagebill but In terms of as a percentage of income, it is by someway, the highest in the league.SouthDownsRoyal wrote:Interesting thread, cheers guys.
Do we have any way of knowing where we are compared with other championship clubs with regards to our wage bill?
I agree the days if the ex premiership journey men must now be over which I think is positive.
I know Kitson, Doyle, Long were taken from lower leagues and repaid us massively with what they achieved but also appreciate it’s easier said that done to just go down he leagues and cherry pick cheap options that will success in the championship but that and some youth players seems a sound way to progress. But of course it does mean some risk and also a possible longer time frame for success, possibly,
Users browsing this forum: Bigbear_74, Clyde1998, Google [Bot], RG30 and 54 guests