Sounds like the very definition of a middle man to me - what am I missingRoyal Lady wrote:Yes, that's my point - I wouldn't have dismissed them, I'd have collated them, got more infor from the nobber(s) concerned and passed it on to STAR.
Instead, I'm cutting out the middle man now and going directly to RFC with nobbers' genuine concerns/comments.

I'd not seen this thread before today, but to go back and pick up on the question around numbers, right now, at 12.37 on a Wednesday afternoon with no Reading game in the last 10 days, there are 98 users viewing the forum.Alexander Litvinenko wrote:- set up a new communication channel with the club, explaining that HNA is the biggest single community of Reading fans and that many feel very differently to what they hear through STAR/RFC's Facebook output
But it's not. It likes to think it is but there are relatively few active and regular posters here (<100) and many of them aren't even Reading fans. There's alos no democratic structure etc - it's a case of whoever shouts loudest or most often gets heard.
During todays game I've seen numbers of over 170.Hoop Blah wrote:At 5.25 on a Weds night there are 125 users online.
Over 200 after the game as well.Hoop Blah wrote:During todays game I've seen numbers of over 170.Hoop Blah wrote:At 5.25 on a Weds night there are 125 users online.
So that's a no then?RG30 wrote:"STAR provided an update on its membership numbers, which showed a significant increase on the previous season; as expected through playing in a higher division."
As per September Management Meeting notes on STAR website
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests