Page 1 of 3

SPECULATION - Dwight Gayle

Posted: 25 Jun 2013 17:30
by punkindrublic
Pure Speculation - Word from the ticket office today is that we are chasing Dwight Gayle from Peterborough.

Any one else hear this?

Re: Dwight Gayle

Posted: 25 Jun 2013 17:36
by peterroyal76
No

Although I believe they want massive money for him.

Re: Dwight Gayle

Posted: 28 Jun 2013 09:15
by Pepe the Horseman
Going to Palace

Re: Dwight Gayle

Posted: 28 Jun 2013 09:28
by Norfolk Royal
I'll be in the hotel all weekend so I'll keep me eyes peeled.

Re: Dwight Gayle

Posted: 28 Jun 2013 10:13
by Tilehurstsouthbank
Yep, Palace bid confirmed last night on SSN.

Re: Dwight Gayle

Posted: 23 Jul 2015 16:46
by punkindrublic
Just bumped into the Head of Welfare showing someone around town and looking at flats etc. He reckons we are looking at Gayle again...anyone else heard this?

Re: Dwight Gayle

Posted: 23 Jul 2015 16:50
by Tommio
punkindrublic wrote:Just bumped into the Head of Welfare showing someone around town and looking at flats etc. He reckons we are looking at Gayle again...anyone else heard this?
He'll cost over £5m, can't see it happening.

Re: Dwight Gayle

Posted: 23 Jul 2015 16:51
by tee peg
On loan so say.

Re: Dwight Gayle

Posted: 23 Jul 2015 16:52
by Tommio
However, we were looking at 2 strikers (Donaldson & Beric) which together would've cost near £5m. Now SC said he only wants one forward, perhaps he's just simply putting the fee for 2 strikers into 1. Still can't it see it happening.

Re: Dwight Gayle

Posted: 23 Jul 2015 17:01
by Nameless
Quotes from Palace saying he's in their plans and not going anywhere, and alsoBournemouth showing interest. Can't see much point in taking him on loan unless it was for the season (and can't remember what the rules are for season long loans either !)

Re: Dwight Gayle

Posted: 23 Jul 2015 17:07
by Tommio
Nameless wrote:Quotes from Palace saying he's in their plans and not going anywhere, and alsoBournemouth showing interest. Can't see much point in taking him on loan unless it was for the season (and can't remember what the rules are for season long loans either !)
They've just loaned in Bamford so they have quite a few forwards.

Re: Dwight Gayle

Posted: 23 Jul 2015 17:15
by Royalwaster
Nameless wrote:Quotes from Palace saying he's in their plans and not going anywhere, and alsoBournemouth showing interest. Can't see much point in taking him on loan unless it was for the season (and can't remember what the rules are for season long loans either !)
Rule is that they are allowed - like Bamford last season ...

Re: Dwight Gayle

Posted: 23 Jul 2015 17:37
by Nameless
Wasn't sure whether there was an age criteria - had to be under 24 for example (like Bamford....)

Re: Dwight Gayle

Posted: 23 Jul 2015 17:39
by Hoop Blah
I'd rather we tried to get Fraizer Campbell if we were going to take one off their hands. Maybe a tad unrealistic though!

Re: Dwight Gayle

Posted: 23 Jul 2015 21:17
by Royal Ginger
I'd have Murray back in a heartbeat.

Re: Dwight Gayle

Posted: 23 Jul 2015 23:40
by Ian Royal
Royal Ginger wrote:I'd have Murray back in a heartbeat.
You'd have to be an idiot not to agree

Re: Dwight Gayle

Posted: 24 Jul 2015 08:15
by gazzer, loyal royal
if we were to go for anyone from Palace it would be Appiah, but apparently he's now out for the whole season with an ankle injury

Re: Dwight Gayle

Posted: 24 Jul 2015 09:22
by Nameless
Given that Murray clearly didn't want to be here last season Clarke would have to do quite a sales job on him if Palace decided to release him. It would have to be a sale not a loan as well and whether that would be of interest for us given his age must be questionable.

Re: Dwight Gayle

Posted: 24 Jul 2015 09:43
by linkenholtroyal
I would take Cambell or Gayle I think if murray wanted to be with us he would and for the fee he would probably need he wouldn't repay it in the time he has left playing

Re: Dwight Gayle

Posted: 24 Jul 2015 10:00
by PistolPete
Of the lot, I'd take Gayle in a heartbeat. We have a couple of big men in Pog and Sa so Murray while better than what we have, is not the style we need; Gayle is quick and direct and can, if needed, play wide in a front three. He's also a great age.