Royal Monk Is this thread a wind up ? .... lets all LOL @ 2 world wars, 1 world cup ... what a muppet
why do all reading fans think theyre so funny on here
by madreadingfan » 21 Feb 2009 23:25
Royal Monk Is this thread a wind up ? .... lets all LOL @ 2 world wars, 1 world cup ... what a muppet
by SLAMMED » 21 Feb 2009 23:56
by Jackson Corner » 22 Feb 2009 01:58
by SLAMMED » 22 Feb 2009 09:18
by RFCBoy » 22 Feb 2009 10:28
2 world wars, 1 world cup This is coming across angry because I think I've not taken today's defeat and dire performance well and I'll probably regret the tone later when I'm a bit calmer.
But I'm glad I'm angry enough to come out with what I've felt for many years:
TO THE EAST STAND
IF YOU'RE NOT GOING TO SING, CHANT, AND SUPPORT our club like we used to before we became infiltrated with plastic glory hunting pathetic excuses of Reading fans... then please kindly f*ck off and stop turning up.
It's games like this where the fans would've made all the difference and East Stand was SILENT the WHOLE GAME (except for when the ref made a howler). And in this game the usual stupid excuse of "the team has to give us something to chant for" is not applicable as we started off outplaying them but were still silent. And just a reminder: back in the pre-plastic days we still kept up the chanting even when we watching the likes of Gurney, Bodin, Brayson and on the verge of being relegated to Tier 4. Because we were Reading through and through. We were player 13, not silent spectators.
We'll never have the Southbank atmosphere but we sure as hell (when I used to be a chantstarter at least) used to support our boys game in game out at the Madstad in the past and there is no excuse not to now.
EAST STAND = DISGRACE
Some players let us down today, but not as much as you did.
WE DO NOT DESERVE TO BE ANYWHERE NEAR THE TOP OF THE TABLE WITH THE SUPPORT WE HAVE
by LoyalRoyalFan » 22 Feb 2009 10:31
by Royal Lady » 22 Feb 2009 10:33
by BobKnows » 22 Feb 2009 14:41
Royal Lady LOL - that's because we're not allowed to by the stewards!
by Royal Lady » 22 Feb 2009 14:46
by Arnie_Pie » 22 Feb 2009 15:11
by glass half full » 22 Feb 2009 15:14
by Millsy » 22 Feb 2009 15:17
by tomrfcurz » 22 Feb 2009 15:31
Alivey I suggested that the club print the chants into the programmes and also have pages of masks that you can rip out of your favourite players but it looks like the powers to be decided that the current atmosphere is sufficient.
by Northern Git » 22 Feb 2009 15:56
BobKnowsRoyal Lady LOL - that's because we're not allowed to by the stewards!
TBF if EVERYBODY did it, can't see how they'd stop it...
by zummerset » 22 Feb 2009 16:18
The 17 Bus probably right Joe, it might also mean that the safety gate could be removed, as the silent fans in the east would not be looking to confront the away fans, and the homers from the North would have the same distance to walk either way.
by RoyalBlue » 22 Feb 2009 16:31
BobKnowsRoyal Lady LOL - that's because we're not allowed to by the stewards!
TBF if EVERYBODY did it, can't see how they'd stop it...
by Cookie » 22 Feb 2009 16:32
by madreadingfan » 22 Feb 2009 16:49
by Victor Meldrew » 22 Feb 2009 16:55
Sebastian Maybe I'm being cynical, but I don't think fans actually make that much of a difference to a team's performance. Yes the manager comes out and says things like: 'The support made all the difference' after a win but he also says things like: 'The fans were great today, and we feel like we've let them down' after a loss. Now, forgive me if you will, but he says that regardless of how noisy or passionate the team is. So why would he lie?
Well, here's an idea - clubs need to make money. Ticket income makes money. By telling fans that they made the difference to get a win, the fans are more likely to come back in future, giving the club another £25. Likewise, by saying that they feel they let the fans down, it makes us feel part of the 'club' (in a sociological sense, as opposed to 'football club' sense), and so makes us want to come back and help turn things around next time.
Singing/chanting/whatever at football has never, to me, seemed to be anything to do with creating reusults, that seems a fallacy to me - it just seems to stem from people wanting to get beered up and scream abuse at people, very cathartic, and a lot of fun: but I can't see how that has any tangible impact on the team.
I enjoy singing and shouting at football, so I do - but those around me that shush me, etc, have every right to do so - in the same way that I have every right to continue acting like a lunatic. These people pay HUNDREDS, if not thousands, of pounds a season to follow Reading - they owe absolutely NOTHING to the club. We are all consumers of a product: if we bought some ice cream, and it was particularly good, we remember to buy that same ice cream again, we don't start chanting that it's by far the greatest cream the world has ever seen. If people want to come with their families, watch the football, enjoy it or otherwise, but not scream and chant, for God's sake let them: they're not doing any damage at all, and they're not exactly depriving anyone else (who might sing and chant) from having a seat - looking around we're not exactly devoid of spaces, are we?!
And that't the crux of the matter, I think - I believe it would be more demoralising to see the attendances going down week on week, than to have things a bit quieter. Empty seats are easy to spot, especially in the vast swathes that we are developing - it's amazing how quickly they fill up again when we start doing well. In football, perhaps more than any other sport, people vote with their feet - not their lungs.
by andrew1957 » 22 Feb 2009 16:58
Users browsing this forum: Fluff, From Despair To Where? and 546 guests