by Dirk Gently » 10 Jan 2008 11:04
by Alan Partridge » 10 Jan 2008 11:05
by Coppelled Streets » 10 Jan 2008 11:08
by West Stand Flash » 10 Jan 2008 11:08
by SpaceCruiser » 10 Jan 2008 11:11
by papereyes » 10 Jan 2008 11:12
by Dirk Gently » 10 Jan 2008 11:19
by Dirk Gently » 10 Jan 2008 11:19
West Stand Flash http://hobnob.royals.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=67838&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=100
by papereyes » 10 Jan 2008 11:21
Dirk Gently Depends if he asked us or not.
Under Law, if I sold you a car that I knew had dodgy brakes that's fine - as long as you don't ask "Are the brakes ok?" Buyer beware and all that.....
But if you do ask and I say "They're fine" then you have legal redress...
by bobby m's syrup » 10 Jan 2008 11:31
Dirk Gently Depends if he asked us or not.
Under Law, if I sold you a car that I knew had dodgy brakes that's fine - as long as you don't ask "Are the brakes ok?" Buyer beware and all that.....
But if you do ask and I say "They're fine" then you have legal redress...
by Uke » 10 Jan 2008 11:35
by TFF » 10 Jan 2008 11:37
Dirk Gently The juiciest bit of gossip I've heard so far this year.
I know there has been speculation about "reasons" for Halford's lack of performances and his sudden departure.
A contact at Sunderland has just suggested to me that the reason behind Roy Keane's fury in the manager's office after the match last month wasn't the last minute goal.
It was a lot more to do with us having sold him a player with a "problem" and not having mentioned that "problem".....
by Coppelled Streets » 10 Jan 2008 11:39
by Uke » 10 Jan 2008 11:40
Dirk Gently The juiciest bit of gossip I've heard so far this year.
I know there has been speculation about "reasons" for Halford's lack of performances and his sudden departure.
A contact at Sunderland has just suggested to me that the reason behind Roy Keane's fury in the manager's office after the match last month wasn't the last minute goal.
It was a lot more to do with us having sold him a player with a "problem" and not having mentioned that "problem".....
by andrew1957 » 10 Jan 2008 11:42
by ElmParker » 10 Jan 2008 11:44
andrew1957 I would have thought football clubs would do checks as part of the medical - a routing blood test would show up any issues.
by papereyes » 10 Jan 2008 11:47
ElmParkerandrew1957 I would have thought football clubs would do checks as part of the medical - a routing blood test would show up any issues.
Depends on the substance. Certain popular recreational drugs clear the system very quickly.
A player would only need to lay off if for a few days before the medical.
by Uke » 10 Jan 2008 11:50
ElmParkerandrew1957 I would have thought football clubs would do checks as part of the medical - a routing blood test would show up any issues.
Depends on the substance. Certain popular recreational drugs clear the system very quickly.
A player would only need to lay off if for a few days before the medical.
by Fezza » 10 Jan 2008 11:50
papereyesElmParkerandrew1957 I would have thought football clubs would do checks as part of the medical - a routing blood test would show up any issues.
Depends on the substance. Certain popular recreational drugs clear the system very quickly.
A player would only need to lay off if for a few days before the medical.
Coke is between a day and 3 days, depending on weight and metabolism.
I remember being told hash takes a lot longer - fat soluble byproducts, I guess.
by Old Biscuitman » 10 Jan 2008 11:51
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 79 guests