by The Cube » 28 Nov 2011 20:57
by PistolPete » 28 Nov 2011 21:18
by Snowball » 28 Nov 2011 21:32
by Snowball » 28 Nov 2011 21:33
by Royalee » 28 Nov 2011 21:35
by FC Bracknell Royal » 28 Nov 2011 21:50
by loyalroyal4life » 28 Nov 2011 22:06
Royalee Le Fondre and Hunt, end of.
Send Church to the Blue Square.
by who are ya? » 28 Nov 2011 22:08
by Ian Royal » 28 Nov 2011 22:36
by pea » 28 Nov 2011 22:45
by Snowball » 28 Nov 2011 23:34
FC Bracknell Royal
Church is easily better than Manset.
by Ian Royal » 28 Nov 2011 23:38
by Snowball » 28 Nov 2011 23:58
by rfc2001 » 29 Nov 2011 00:41
by rfc2001 » 29 Nov 2011 00:46
by RobRoyal » 29 Nov 2011 08:39
The Cube But some of these obviously won't work in practice and so can be immediately eliminated.
by RoyalJames101 » 29 Nov 2011 08:49
Ian Royal Le Fondre & Hunt have the best individual contributions. We just don't score much with Church on the pitch. He doesn't score much and he doesn't provide goals. Manset is the ideal super sub. HRK is a decent cover for striker and winger.
We've tried Church and Le Fondre for a good period. It didn't work. Hunt & Le Fondre haven't had a great deal of pitch time together, but seem to be doing ok. So that's the one to try at the moment IMO.
by muddyfeet » 29 Nov 2011 08:55
by Hoop Blah » 29 Nov 2011 08:58
Snowball Maybe so.
But I was discussing how a player who manages just one attacking major contribution
every 5.1 games could be "EASILY BETTER" than one who manages the same feat
in better than a game and a half.
0,515 Minutes 04 Major Contributions 129 Minutes per major contribution 3 Goals 1 Assists MANSET
0,914 Minutes 02 Major Contributions 457 Minutes per major contribution 2 Goals 0 Assists CHURCH
by melonhead » 29 Nov 2011 09:26
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 382 guests