by frimmers3 » 15 Dec 2012 15:36
by Avon Royal » 15 Dec 2012 15:53
MmmMonsterMunchAvon Royal Now that Brian has questioned our lack of investment in the Summer, I fully expect Brendy, Monstermunch and chums to tell him to fuck off and manage Chelsea.......
Afternoon Avon
by MmmMonsterMunch » 15 Dec 2012 16:39
by bcubed » 15 Dec 2012 16:41
LacosteLoyalRoyalFanSnowball
At Brighton, West Ham, and Southampton we could've and IMO should've, shipped a load of goals and lost heavily
but those sides froze and missed too often. That is, it was less we won those games deservedly
than the opposition blew it. A definite difference IMO.
![]()
Truly pathetic statement.
A pretty true statement though. Don't listen to the RFC propaganda machine. We fluked results last year
by Avon Royal » 15 Dec 2012 16:43
MmmMonsterMunch Don't see who we'd have brought in though - which is a massive part of the do we don't we debate. We are far too above board for 'Arry to come here for example.
by MmmMonsterMunch » 15 Dec 2012 16:44
Avon RoyalMmmMonsterMunch Don't see who we'd have brought in though - which is a massive part of the do we don't we debate. We are far too above board for 'Arry to come here for example.
But you have to admit it does rather piss all over the "new manager won't get more out of existing players" argument.
by MmmMonsterMunch » 15 Dec 2012 16:46
by Avon Royal » 15 Dec 2012 16:48
by Avon Royal » 15 Dec 2012 16:53
MmmMonsterMunch Anyway Avon - You will see from my posts since last weekend, I suspect Brian has lost the dressing room and with a heavy heart voted for him to go.
by MmmMonsterMunch » 15 Dec 2012 16:59
Avon Royal I didn't say you did - just said it pissed all over that often made argument and invited you to agree.![]()
QPR unbeaten since bringing in a new man, we've lost ALL our games over the same period. Decisive action in better than no action shocker.
by Avon Royal » 15 Dec 2012 17:02
by MmmMonsterMunch » 15 Dec 2012 17:12
Avon Royal It was obvious for a long time before Wigan though, that is what is so frustrating.
by Victor Meldrew » 15 Dec 2012 18:09
Avon Royal I didn't say you did - just said it pissed all over that often made argument and invited you to agree.![]()
QPR unbeaten since bringing in a new man, we've lost ALL our games over the same period. Decisive action in better than no action shocker.
by RoyalBlue » 15 Dec 2012 19:42
Victor MeldrewAvon Royal I didn't say you did - just said it pissed all over that often made argument and invited you to agree.![]()
QPR unbeaten since bringing in a new man, we've lost ALL our games over the same period. Decisive action in better than no action shocker.
It's not just QPR though is it that have had an upturn since a new manager came in and managed the same set of players.
Take a good look at Coventry and Bournemouth to see what an effect a change can have.
When Anton looks at tomorrow's papers (presumably he does follow our fortunes from afar and doesn't just rely on his chairman keeping him advised and telling him what a bargain he had)he will see us sitting rock bottom and the message becomes loud and clear "no £40 million + next year".
Bournemouth manager Eddie Howe says he has not yet been promised any money to spend in the January transfer window.
by Victor Meldrew » 15 Dec 2012 19:55
RoyalBlueVictor MeldrewAvon Royal I didn't say you did - just said it pissed all over that often made argument and invited you to agree.![]()
QPR unbeaten since bringing in a new man, we've lost ALL our games over the same period. Decisive action in better than no action shocker.
It's not just QPR though is it that have had an upturn since a new manager came in and managed the same set of players.
Take a good look at Coventry and Bournemouth to see what an effect a change can have.
When Anton looks at tomorrow's papers (presumably he does follow our fortunes from afar and doesn't just rely on his chairman keeping him advised and telling him what a bargain he had)he will see us sitting rock bottom and the message becomes loud and clear "no £40 million + next year".
Do you think we would poach Eddie Howe?
He'd feel quite at home at RFC:
Bournemouth manager Eddie Howe says he has not yet been promised any money to spend in the January transfer window.
by Get Carter » 15 Dec 2012 22:01
by SPARTA » 15 Dec 2012 22:04
Get Carter Now McD is telling us again & again & again that we are punching above our weight and RFC have never spent big money on transfer fees and we must do things the Reading way.
I thought the manager's job was to win football matches and leave the budget & finances of the club to the Board of Directors and the owner.
We have lost five on the bounce & next up is Arsenal & Man City & City away could be hugely embarrassing if we play like we did at Sunderland.
IMHO the Pog, Guthrie & Taylor should start against Arsenal and Gorkss to come in for Mariappa.
by Vision » 17 Dec 2012 11:36
RoyalBlueVision
LOL. There's always more to it than a simple statement but given that Guthrie has come out himself and said he refused to travel because his "head wasn't right" then I'd say that it's safe to assume he refused to travel. The reasons for his head not being right are open to debate of course but the fact he refused to travel isn't unless you're an outsider who doesn't know the facts or a serial conspiracy theorist.
Or it could be that as an excellent and model professional footballer in his time, a former RFC employee of longstanding (probably still with contacts at the club) and now a manager himself (IIRC), he knows far more about what goes on behind the scenes than either of us and has a pretty damn strong feeling that blame is certainly not a one way street in this particular saga.
by RoyalBlue » 17 Dec 2012 14:35
VisionRoyalBlueVision
LOL. There's always more to it than a simple statement but given that Guthrie has come out himself and said he refused to travel because his "head wasn't right" then I'd say that it's safe to assume he refused to travel. The reasons for his head not being right are open to debate of course but the fact he refused to travel isn't unless you're an outsider who doesn't know the facts or a serial conspiracy theorist.
Or it could be that as an excellent and model professional footballer in his time, a former RFC employee of longstanding (probably still with contacts at the club) and now a manager himself (IIRC), he knows far more about what goes on behind the scenes than either of us and has a pretty damn strong feeling that blame is certainly not a one way street in this particular saga.
As I said the "reasons" or "blame" as you seem to like apportioning that sort of thing are open to to debate. However the tweet stated that he's not having that Guthrie refused to travel. Given that Guthrie himself has said he refused to travel what makes you think the manager of Dover Athletic or wherever Forster is now knows better than the player himself?
But yeah the player admitted it at personal cost to himself but Nicky Forster says he didn't so obviously he knows better.
by Vision » 17 Dec 2012 14:52
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], MartinRdg, Orion1871, parky, Polish International, WestYorksRoyal and 259 guests