by Royal Rother » 29 Dec 2013 17:32
by Y21 » 29 Dec 2013 17:34
by The Real Sandhurst Royal » 29 Dec 2013 17:35
Gordon Cumming wrote: I do feel, at the moment, there seems to be cause for concern about our future prospects................
Would I be right in this assumption?
by leon » 29 Dec 2013 17:36
PlatypussleonPlatypuss
Indeed. And I can't see anything on there to back up what you claimed.
Why was there even a thread then? Because everyone was being overly pessimistic?
Because some were?
Show me where a majority thought we'd be top two.
by super darren caskey » 29 Dec 2013 17:38
by MmmMonsterMunch » 29 Dec 2013 17:39
by Platypuss » 29 Dec 2013 17:39
leon nothing at all to back up what he said
by BraisingsteakRoyal » 29 Dec 2013 17:40
by MmmMonsterMunch » 29 Dec 2013 17:40
Royal Rother Is this The Ashes thread?
by SHORT AND CURLY » 29 Dec 2013 17:42
by facaldaqui » 29 Dec 2013 17:43
Westwood52 Too often Managers are unfairly sacked-however once you lose the Players there is no point him carrying on-trouble is there is no one at the Club to get Adkins out.
by P!ssed Off » 29 Dec 2013 17:43
MmmMonsterMunch Leon - In all seriousness is this squad actually better than our current position though?
Lots of them are ageing & past their best. McAnuff, Cummings, Kelly, Guthrie, Gorkss to name a few, others are acquisitions from mid table championship teams or League 1.
I'm not so sure....
by BraisingsteakRoyal » 29 Dec 2013 17:43
MmmMonsterMunch Leon - In all seriousness is this squad actually better than our current position though?
Lots of them are ageing & past their best. McAnuff, Cummings, Kelly, Guthrie, Gorkss to name a few, others are acquisitions from mid table championship teams or League 1.
I'm not so sure....
by AirRaidSiren » 29 Dec 2013 17:44
P!ssed OffAirRaidSirenP!ssed Off Adkins has 90 more minutes as far as I'm concerned.
If we lose against Forest then he's done as far as I'm concerned.
I think the majority of fans (regardless of what a few on HNA say) feel the same way.
I just don't get this attitude(not you directly, but the fans you are talking about), I will say this again and again until I'm blue in the face. Leicester City under Pearson. His first season was a season where he changed this to do things his way, it's taken him nearly TWO seasons to get the blend right, and they are reaping the benefits. Were Leicester fans on his back before January of his first season? No. They gave him the time he needed.
I don't follow Leicester mate.
Did Nigel Pearson's Leicester really go a whole half a season without 1 single decent performance?
I highly doubt it...
Leicester did okay for 2 seasons and now they're doing very well.
Pearson took over a squad in October that had finished 10th in the Championship the previous season.
Then he finished 9th, then 6th, now he's 1st.
Adkins is taking Reading down in quality and standing. How you can compare that Pearson's Leicester?
by MmmMonsterMunch » 29 Dec 2013 17:45
Y21 As it would appear that these players are not good enough to play the style Adkins wants, why does he continue to play that way?
Surely it would make more sense to play a more direct style that these players can cope with until he can get the players in to play the way he wants?
by rob the royal » 29 Dec 2013 17:45
BraisingsteakRoyal I'll tell you who I feel sorry for - not the fans, nor Adkins, but the poor fella that has to put together the end of season 'highlights' DVD.
by MmmMonsterMunch » 29 Dec 2013 17:46
BraisingsteakRoyalMmmMonsterMunch Leon - In all seriousness is this squad actually better than our current position though?
Lots of them are ageing & past their best. McAnuff, Cummings, Kelly, Guthrie, Gorkss to name a few, others are acquisitions from mid table championship teams or League 1.
I'm not so sure....
Lol at Guthrie (26) and Cummings (24) being past (sic) their best.
by leon » 29 Dec 2013 17:46
Platypussleon nothing at all to back up what he said
Cheers - just thought I'd check.
by Alfie10 » 29 Dec 2013 17:47
by BraisingsteakRoyal » 29 Dec 2013 17:48
MmmMonsterMunchBraisingsteakRoyalMmmMonsterMunch Leon - In all seriousness is this squad actually better than our current position though?
Lots of them are ageing & past their best. McAnuff, Cummings, Kelly, Guthrie, Gorkss to name a few, others are acquisitions from mid table championship teams or League 1.
I'm not so sure....
Lol at Guthrie (26) and Cummings (24) being past (sic) their best.
Well I don't see any other top half Champ / Prem teams coming in for them....
If all our players are so good then why is no one chomping at the bit to sign them?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 164 guests