by Hoop Blah »
25 Jun 2015 10:35
Nameless 3points SCIAG - I don't disagree with the principal of your comment. The point i was trying to make is that most people would assume Ake and Chalobah are deemed to be better players than Kuhl as they are in the Chelsea academy and are regular U21 internationals. Whether that is true or not depends, at this stage, on an individual's relative perspective. Personally I thought they both looked better than most of our squad, but that's me. However, because they are "Chelsea players" I think supporters' expectations is higher which is why many didn't think they were that good but, at the end of the day, neither may make it in top flight football and Kuhl may do.
Nameless Be fair though. Challah and Ake are older than Kuhl so no surprise they are playing for the older age group internationally. Kuhn was playing for his age group England side last season.....
Chalobah is only 12 months older than Kuhl and has already now played three full seasons in first team football at Championship and a taste of above. By the time he was Kuhls age he'd a pretty key role in the Watford team that finished 3rd in the Championship then spent another season on loan at Forest and 'Boro playing week-in week-out for both teams.
Kuhl has, I think, played just the once for the under 19s and that's it. At that level England like to dish out a lot of caps to take a look at as many players as possible. Chalobah on the other hand has consistently played a year or two above himself through all the age groups and been a key player and captain of those sides as he's progressed. I don't think you can really compare the two in terms of their progress or how people who matter perceive their quality or potential.
For me I prefer Kuhl's style of play but I'm also not a fan of Chalobah so I'm biased there.