by melonhead » 11 Dec 2011 17:28
by melonhead » 11 Dec 2011 17:29
Franchise FC Why is 'touching your sock' a criminal offence punishable with stud-scraping when clapping an opponent who's just scored an own goal is OK and not considered taking the pi$$ ?
by Svlad Cjelli » 11 Dec 2011 17:30
ZacNaloen I don't think i'll find it particularly difficult to sneer back either.
The difference between me and Collison?
Sneer is all I'd do.
by ZacNaloen » 11 Dec 2011 17:30
Franchise FC Why is 'touching your sock' a criminal offence punishable with stud-scraping when clapping an opponent who's just scored an own goal is OK and not considered taking the pi$$ ?
by melonhead » 11 Dec 2011 17:31
by melonhead » 11 Dec 2011 17:31
ZacNaloenFranchise FC Why is 'touching your sock' a criminal offence punishable with stud-scraping when clapping an opponent who's just scored an own goal is OK and not considered taking the pi$$ ?
Look, i'm not justifying it, but in England we have this thing called fair play and if you break those rules it's totally understandable if someone gives you a good kicking. Okay?
by Bandini » 11 Dec 2011 17:33
Svlad CjelliBandini
Some may be liable to do anything, and whether or not that's the case depends on the extent of their self-control, which is why Kebe's display of sock skillz only explains the initial stage of the process, Collison getting angry. Everything after that point is explained by Collison himself, not Kebe.
After all, it's not as if Collison's response was an instinctive reaction, he had plenty of time to think about it and exercise self-control.
Yes, no argument with that. The point in question is why Collinson's temper was pushed over the edge, which was Kebe's behaviour.
Has anyone ever tried to defend Collinson's actons? All they've tried to do is explain them.
by winchester_royal » 11 Dec 2011 17:36
by Franchise FC » 11 Dec 2011 17:37
ZacNaloenFranchise FC Why is 'touching your sock' a criminal offence punishable with stud-scraping when clapping an opponent who's just scored an own goal is OK and not considered taking the pi$$ ?
Look, i'm not justifying it, but in England we have this thing called fair play and if you break those rules it's totally understandable if someone gives you a good kicking. Okay?
by ZacNaloen » 11 Dec 2011 17:37
Svlad CjelliZacNaloen I don't think i'll find it particularly difficult to sneer back either.
The difference between me and Collison?
Sneer is all I'd do.
Well done you. Never ever lost your temper in your whole life? Just sat there in the corner polishing your halo throughout your time?
He lost his temper, simple as that. He's a young kid, he was playing crap, his team were getting stuffed - it's not excusable, he shouldn't have done it, but he did. Now he'll get an extra ban whcih he'll deserve. Live with it!
by Franchise FC » 11 Dec 2011 17:38
ZacNaloenSvlad CjelliZacNaloen I don't think i'll find it particularly difficult to sneer back either.
The difference between me and Collison?
Sneer is all I'd do.
Well done you. Never ever lost your temper in your whole life? Just sat there in the corner polishing your halo throughout your time?
He lost his temper, simple as that. He's a young kid, he was playing crap, his team were getting stuffed - it's not excusable, he shouldn't have done it, but he did. Now he'll get an extra ban whcih he'll deserve. Live with it!
Seems to me you are the one that needs to be told to live with it. Collison is getting exactly what he deserves. I can live with that just fine
by ZacNaloen » 11 Dec 2011 17:39
Franchise FCZacNaloenFranchise FC Why is 'touching your sock' a criminal offence punishable with stud-scraping when clapping an opponent who's just scored an own goal is OK and not considered taking the pi$$ ?
Look, i'm not justifying it, but in England we have this thing called fair play and if you break those rules it's totally understandable if someone gives you a good kicking. Okay?
Errrr - no.
Dream on if you believe that there's fair play in football. Bobby Moore's wasn't playing yesterday. He might have wandered over to shake JK's hand and congratulate him on being better on the day.
Collison on the other hand ..............
by Royal Rother » 11 Dec 2011 17:42
Svlad CjelliZacNaloenYes, no argument with that. The point in question is why Collinson's temper was pushed over the edge, which was Kebe's behaviour.
Has anyone ever tried to defend Collinson's actons? All they've tried to do is explain them
Err no.
The point is question is whether Collison has an excuse for his actions.
Really? Who has ever said he has an excuse? I know I haven't, and neither did Claridge.
All that people have done is explain the circumstances that led to him being so wound up.
by ZacNaloen » 11 Dec 2011 17:44
by melonhead » 11 Dec 2011 17:47
Royal RotherSvlad CjelliZacNaloen
Err no.
The point is question is whether Collison has an excuse for his actions.
Really? Who has ever said he has an excuse? I know I haven't, and neither did Claridge.
All that people have done is explain the circumstances that led to him being so wound up.
But this is all a terribly difficult concept for some, even when explained in very simple terms.
The blatant refusal of some posters to engage brain is almost as embarrassing as Collison's actions yesterday.
by Royal Rother » 11 Dec 2011 17:48
ZacNaloen We don't need the circumstances explained to us we know exactly why Collison lost his temper, that anyone feels that we do suggests they feel that there is some way in which if you JUST EXPLAINED THE SITUATION WELL ENOUGH we might start to feel sorry for Collison.
Do you know what I say to that?
Fuck off.
by Royal Rother » 11 Dec 2011 17:53
melonheadRoyal RotherSvlad Cjelli
Really? Who has ever said he has an excuse? I know I haven't, and neither did Claridge.
All that people have done is explain the circumstances that led to him being so wound up.
But this is all a terribly difficult concept for some, even when explained in very simple terms.
The blatant refusal of some posters to engage brain is almost as embarrassing as Collison's actions yesterday.
we were there, we dont need that bit explaining- clearly JHK mocked west ham slightly with his sock pulling gesture.
what people are questioning is how that in some way explains his mental reaction, or our "understanding" or lack of it, of it
by ZacNaloen » 11 Dec 2011 17:54
Look, i'm not justifying it, but in England we have this thing called fair play and if you break those rules it's totally understandable if someone gives you a good kicking. Okay?
by Bandini » 11 Dec 2011 18:02
Svlad Cjelli
He lost his temper, simple as that. He's a young kid, he was playing crap, his team were getting stuffed -
by Ian Royal » 11 Dec 2011 18:03
melonheadIan RoyalThe Real Sandhurst Royal The media are all dicks when it come to incidents like this they put the judges gown and wig on and make stupid comments that are biased one way this time Kebe has taken the brunt of it.
Collison's challenge on Kebe was premeditated and could well have caused significant injury.
Same Allardyce's post match interview sums it up for me, very fair comments all round, maybe the media should take a leaf out of Big Sams book.
Agree with all that except the significant injury bit.
kicking someone hard in the kneee can do that cant it?
Users browsing this forum: rabidbee, Royals and Racers, Vision and 306 guests