Snowball Deal with the oxf*rd substance Brenders, instead of just trying to be cute.
I'm saying we were going into melt-down and McDermot HAD TO GO to save the club
It's a very good decision (for the club)
Greed
by windermere_royal » 12 Mar 2013 16:35
Snowball Deal with the oxf*rd substance Brenders, instead of just trying to be cute.
I'm saying we were going into melt-down and McDermot HAD TO GO to save the club
It's a very good decision (for the club)
by melonhead » 12 Mar 2013 16:36
by windermere_royal » 12 Mar 2013 16:36
soggy biscuitSnowball It's a very good decision (for the club)
In your opinion which lots of people disagree with
by mr_number » 12 Mar 2013 16:38
windermere_royalRoyal Ginger I believe this sacking is an utter load of crap. He was a hero mere months ago, earned the right to manage every minute of this season
So did Adkins at Southampton, but they were ruthless just as we have been, I wonder if the Saints fans kicked up like as happened here, it appears their decision was vindicated, i hope ours is too.
by melonhead » 12 Mar 2013 16:40
windermere_royalsoggy biscuitSnowball It's a very good decision (for the club)
In your opinion which lots of people disagree with
And just as many agree with, isn`t debate wondeful?
by Arch » 12 Mar 2013 16:42
by melonhead » 12 Mar 2013 16:52
by Snowball » 12 Mar 2013 16:53
melonhead i have dealt with the substance
the substance seems to be" i predicted we would get a massive thrashing in future games if mcdermott stayed, and this is important as its my opinion, based on mad predictions of future scenarios"
thats what i commented on.
no need to swear
by Wycombe Royal » 12 Mar 2013 16:53
by melonhead » 12 Mar 2013 16:55
Snowballmelonhead i have dealt with the substance
the substance seems to be" i predicted we would get a massive thrashing in future games if mcdermott stayed, and this is important as its my opinion, based on mad predictions of future scenarios"
thats what i commented on.
no need to swear
Nope, the fact that I suggested what might well happen was already starting to happen is NOT the point.
by melonhead » 12 Mar 2013 16:56
It was extremely likely, with Feds, Pog, Kebe out and the team playing poorly, that we were going to get tanked at Old Trafford and The Emirates
by Caskeys Lovechild » 12 Mar 2013 16:57
Snowballmelonhead i have dealt with the substance
the substance seems to be" i predicted we would get a massive thrashing in future games if mcdermott stayed, and this is important as its my opinion, based on mad predictions of future scenarios"
thats what i commented on.
no need to swear
Nope, the fact that I suggested what might well happen was already starting to happen is NOT the point.
The point is we were disintegrating as a team, the defence was shambolic,
the team rudderless AND THINGS WERE GETTING WORSE.
It was extremely likely, with Feds, Pog, Kebe out and the team playing poorly, that we were going to get tanked at Old Trafford and The Emirates
That would then be SEVEN consecutive defeats and if these were say 4-0 each a GD of 20-4, Reading rock-bottom of the league and with the worst GD in the league.
I believe that would be humiliating and would get worse thereafter (in the last seven games)
Anyone who has listened to Brian's litany of excuses recently must surely agree he's been more and more desperate
by Elm Park Pasty » 12 Mar 2013 17:00
Wycombe Royal Football fans have too much much sentimentality.
Here is the way I see it:
1) He was being too loyal to under-performing players.
2) He rarely altered the way the team played before a match kicked off to counter that way the opposition played.
3) His substitutions recently had become predictable and wrong (Saturday being the latest example)
4) McAnuff plays better in central midfield which is where he gets moved to during a game so as to accomodate him when making changes. Why not start him there?
5) Drops Pearce for one mistake yet doesn't drop others
6) Doesn't play to players particular strengths. He signs a ball playing central midfielder then rather adapt our style of play to fit him, he gets the player to alter the way he plays. Why not just buy a hoofer in the first place?
7) Adopts a long ball style of play whilst all the opposition pass us off the pitchMost importantly - all season we have shown our inability to retain possession of the ball, yet there has been no apparent attempt to improve this. We have conceded goals time after time after giving possession away cheaply. I don't want to see a Swansea "keep ball" style of play but we need to be better at keeping the ball than we currently are.
by Snowball » 12 Mar 2013 18:52
melonheadIt was extremely likely, with Feds, Pog, Kebe out and the team playing poorly, that we were going to get tanked at Old Trafford and The Emirates
and brian going changes that how? // would you perhaps have said the same, before the last time we visited old trafford?
by Norfolk Royal » 12 Mar 2013 19:01
melonhead saying something is correct because i believe a giant carrot will descend from the sky next wednesday doesnt make it so.
by frimmers3 » 12 Mar 2013 19:02
by AthleticoSpizz » 12 Mar 2013 19:06
by Snowball » 12 Mar 2013 19:13
by Riseley » 12 Mar 2013 19:20
Another old git in yours truly has to concur with your viewpoint.Hampshire Royal Just when you think the season couldn't get any worse - Brian gets sacked and now people are saying Di Canio is in the running to be next manager, not only saying that he might be, but actually calling for him to be manager!
It's hasn't been easy to be a Reading fan for 46 years, but it may well be impossible for me to carry on supporting any club who appoints a dyed-in-the-wool Nazi as manager.
by Royal Lady » 12 Mar 2013 19:26
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 285 guests