by Royal Lady » 27 Mar 2013 11:14
by soggy biscuit » 27 Mar 2013 11:22
ZacNaloenRoyal Lady IMO he should have said "we cannot point the finger at one person. Maybe we are all to blame in some way - but lessons have been learned" or something similar.
He, clearly to me, pointed the finger at McD. He was basically asked "what it the manager's fault we didn't spend much money" and he answered "yes". He SHOULD have said what I said above. Which is far more diplomatic. Perhaps he will learn from this little escapade - we should know whether he has, dependant on what funds are spent in the Summer I suppose.
Could you have formulated that statement under massive pressure, when already a bag of nerves, while a reporter is grilling you with questions trying to paint you have as a villain?
by winchester_royal » 27 Mar 2013 11:24
soggy biscuitZacNaloenRoyal Lady IMO he should have said "we cannot point the finger at one person. Maybe we are all to blame in some way - but lessons have been learned" or something similar.
He, clearly to me, pointed the finger at McD. He was basically asked "what it the manager's fault we didn't spend much money" and he answered "yes". He SHOULD have said what I said above. Which is far more diplomatic. Perhaps he will learn from this little escapade - we should know whether he has, dependant on what funds are spent in the Summer I suppose.
Could you have formulated that statement under massive pressure, when already a bag of nerves, while a reporter is grilling you with questions trying to paint you have as a villain?
It was pretty obvious those kind of questions would come up and there are simple ways around it. Some chairman don't do press conferences instead leaving it to press officers/those in a professional position to handle. Alternatively he could have read out a short statement on Brian leaving and then said that they would not answer any more questions on it as this was all about looking to the future.
Who's fault things have been are a bit irrelevant to the point I am making. Just think the way AZ pointed the finger yesterday was very disappointing when he didn't need to.
by Royal Lady » 27 Mar 2013 11:25
by melonhead » 27 Mar 2013 11:26
by soggy biscuit » 27 Mar 2013 11:27
Royal Lady Agreeing completely with Soggy again I'm afraid. I feel dirty.
by Royal Lady » 27 Mar 2013 11:33
melonhead just dont see how brian was supposed to attract expensively brilliant players here, regardless of how much money hed been given.
could we have bought 3 half decent players with that 10 million instead? i guess, but thats not really what we needed
by themadstad » 27 Mar 2013 11:33
by winchester_royal » 27 Mar 2013 11:36
melonhead just dont see how brian was supposed to attract expensively brilliant players here, regardless of how much money hed been given.
could we have bought 3 half decent players with that 10 million instead? i guess, but thats not really what we needed
by Royal Lady » 27 Mar 2013 11:39
winchester_royalmelonhead just dont see how brian was supposed to attract expensively brilliant players here, regardless of how much money hed been given.
could we have bought 3 half decent players with that 10 million instead? i guess, but thats not really what we needed
Ultimately, we don't know what went on. It's probably likely that both were at fault. But given the hostility Anton has faced in the media over the last couple of weeks I don't think anything he said yesterday was out of order. Especially as he was originally trying to divert all the conversation back to Adkins' appointment.
by themadstad » 27 Mar 2013 11:41
Royal Ladywinchester_royalmelonhead just dont see how brian was supposed to attract expensively brilliant players here, regardless of how much money hed been given.
could we have bought 3 half decent players with that 10 million instead? i guess, but thats not really what we needed
Ultimately, we don't know what went on. It's probably likely that both were at fault. But given the hostility Anton has faced in the media over the last couple of weeks I don't think anything he said yesterday was out of order. Especially as he was originally trying to divert all the conversation back to Adkins' appointment.
Well, perhaps he could have been advised beforehand to say he wasn't here to talk about past managers but to talk about the exciting new manager who has just joined us.It's really not difficult.
by winchester_royal » 27 Mar 2013 11:41
Royal Ladywinchester_royalmelonhead just dont see how brian was supposed to attract expensively brilliant players here, regardless of how much money hed been given.
could we have bought 3 half decent players with that 10 million instead? i guess, but thats not really what we needed
Ultimately, we don't know what went on. It's probably likely that both were at fault. But given the hostility Anton has faced in the media over the last couple of weeks I don't think anything he said yesterday was out of order. Especially as he was originally trying to divert all the conversation back to Adkins' appointment.
Well, perhaps he could have been advised beforehand to say he wasn't here to talk about past managers but to talk about the exciting new manager who has just joined us.It's really not difficult.
by melonhead » 27 Mar 2013 11:44
winchester_royalmelonhead just dont see how brian was supposed to attract expensively brilliant players here, regardless of how much money hed been given.
could we have bought 3 half decent players with that 10 million instead? i guess, but thats not really what we needed
Ultimately, we don't know what went on. It's probably likely that both were at fault. But given the hostility Anton has faced in the media over the last couple of weeks I don't think anything he said yesterday was out of order. Especially as he was originally trying to divert all the conversation back to Adkins' appointment.
by themadstad » 27 Mar 2013 11:48
by winchester_royal » 27 Mar 2013 11:49
melonheadwinchester_royalmelonhead just dont see how brian was supposed to attract expensively brilliant players here, regardless of how much money hed been given.
could we have bought 3 half decent players with that 10 million instead? i guess, but thats not really what we needed
Ultimately, we don't know what went on. It's probably likely that both were at fault. But given the hostility Anton has faced in the media over the last couple of weeks I don't think anything he said yesterday was out of order. Especially as he was originally trying to divert all the conversation back to Adkins' appointment.
we do know what went on. anton gave brian the budget of ~10 million to buy a really good player (like ince or gylfi or aspas)
brian tried to get gylfi brian and aspas, but failed, either because the selling clubs thought they were worth ,more, or because they didnt really want to play for a few months for reading then get relegated.
thats not brians fault, thats not antons fault. it just is.
the only fault lies with brian for not then either having an endless list of 10 million pound attackingf midfielders to get instead, or to butymore players, for less money each. i can understand him not going with that second option
by Extended-Phenotype » 27 Mar 2013 11:54
melonhead just dont see how brian was supposed to attract expensively brilliant players here, regardless of how much money hed been given.
by melonhead » 27 Mar 2013 12:00
winchester_royalmelonheadwinchester_royal Ultimately, we don't know what went on. It's probably likely that both were at fault. But given the hostility Anton has faced in the media over the last couple of weeks I don't think anything he said yesterday was out of order. Especially as he was originally trying to divert all the conversation back to Adkins' appointment.
we do know what went on. anton gave brian the budget of ~10 million to buy a really good player (like ince or gylfi or aspas)
brian tried to get gylfi brian and aspas, but failed, either because the selling clubs thought they were worth , or because they didnt really want to play for a few months for reading then get relegated.
thats not brians fault, thats not antons fault. it just is.
the only fault lies with brian for not then either having an endless list of 10 million pound attackingf midfielders to get instead, or to butymore players, for less money each. i can understand him not going with that second option
We don't know that's exactly what went on.
by winchester_royal » 27 Mar 2013 12:19
melonhead
100% KNOW that the follwing is 100% true
owner released funds for the purchase of an attacking midfielder
manager targetted a number of attacking midfielders and made enquiries/bids
enquiries/bids were either turned down, or players turned us down.
by Esteban » 27 Mar 2013 12:21
Royal Ladymelonhead just dont see how brian was supposed to attract expensively brilliant players here, regardless of how much money hed been given.
could we have bought 3 half decent players with that 10 million instead? i guess, but thats not really what we needed
So you agree it wasn't totally his fault then? Hallelujah. AZ clearly said "yes" when asked if it were the manager's fault - so not sure why you're sticking up for AZ in that case.
by SPARTA » 27 Mar 2013 12:27
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 461 guests