by blueroyals » 04 May 2013 16:27
by ZacNaloen » 04 May 2013 16:27
by Royal91 » 04 May 2013 16:27
by Libertine » 04 May 2013 16:27
by Mike Hunt » 04 May 2013 16:27
by ZacNaloen » 04 May 2013 16:27
by P!ssed Off » 04 May 2013 16:27
by winchester_royal » 04 May 2013 16:27
by Ouroboros » 04 May 2013 16:28
by Royal Ginger » 04 May 2013 16:28
by 10539.4 Miles Away » 04 May 2013 16:28
by USA_Loyal_Royal » 04 May 2013 16:28
by higher » 04 May 2013 16:28
by Royal With Cheese » 04 May 2013 16:29
by 10539.4 Miles Away » 04 May 2013 16:29
ZacNaloen Can someone explain why the commentators think that should have been a Pen?
by ZacNaloen » 04 May 2013 16:30
?Royal Ginger Kelly got in his feet. Should've been a peanalty. Nice goal from Hal though.
by Royalupnorth » 04 May 2013 16:30
by Royal With Cheese » 04 May 2013 16:30
10539.4 Miles AwayZacNaloen Can someone explain why the commentators think that should have been a Pen?
I think they're going with the "Kelly looked guilty" principle to argue for the penalty
by Royal Ginger » 04 May 2013 16:31
ZacNaloen?Royal Ginger Kelly got in his feet. Should've been a peanalty. Nice goal from Hal though.
Kelly was in front of him and had his feet on the ball before Berbatov got tangled with him? Just not seeing it tbh
by P!ssed Off » 04 May 2013 16:32