by Rex » 01 Feb 2009 22:11
by Royal With Cheese » 02 Feb 2009 00:13
by Rex » 02 Feb 2009 00:25
by Royal With Cheese » 02 Feb 2009 00:31
by Schards#2 » 02 Feb 2009 09:30
Royal With CheeseSchards#2 I'm sure from a few thousand miles away today's effort was entertaining and inspiring, however, from 6 yards away it was dull, uninspiring and woeful as have been many recent games.
The only reason we are second is because everyone else in this division is even worse. We are a poor team, far worse than the 106 side, far worse than the side that finished 8th in the prem and worse than the one that got relegated.
Progress? Maybe from the other side of an ocean, but not in the flesh i'm afraid.
That's without doubt the post of the century.
I thought you couldn't make yourself look more stupid but congratulations, you've managed it in spectacular fashion.
Keep it up - you're like Sir Dodger Royal without the humour.
by readingbedding » 02 Feb 2009 09:37
by CMRoyal » 02 Feb 2009 09:50
by Schards#2 » 02 Feb 2009 09:53
readingbedding Moans out of the game, moans in the game.
Z3, Row E if I'm not mistaken...
If we're second that's because the League is the worst in his 'memory', what a coincidence eh...
Couldn't make it up!
Anyway, he is now cock-blocked, just hope I don't have the misfortune of standing near the miserable sod again...
by Sun Tzu » 02 Feb 2009 09:59
by Baines » 02 Feb 2009 10:00
Schards#2
Given your post accepting that the team is the worst it's been for three years, can you explain this post?
Progress is improving, we are not improving.
by Schards#2 » 02 Feb 2009 10:11
BainesSchards#2
Given your post accepting that the team is the worst it's been for three years, can you explain this post?
Progress is improving, we are not improving.
If you see progress as improving on the 05/06 and 06/07 seasons, then it seems rather unlikely that that narrow definition of progress will be achieved. But then I suspect that few clubs would consider that they had progressed only if they improved on their best ever seasons.
If you see progress as the club consolidating itself as a club which can expect to be challenging for automatic promotion from the Championship every year (and from the viewpoint of 5 and certainly 10 years ago, that would seem to be progress), then that seems a more realistic possibility.
As an aside, I'm not sure that I can recall a relegated Reading side bouncing back anything like as strongly as this one has done so far.
by readingbedding » 02 Feb 2009 10:12
BainesSchards#2
Given your post accepting that the team is the worst it's been for three years, can you explain this post?
Progress is improving, we are not improving.
If you see progress as improving on the 05/06 and 06/07 seasons, then it seems rather unlikely that that narrow definition of progress will be achieved. But then I suspect that few clubs would consider that they had progressed only if they improved on their best ever seasons.
If you see progress as the club consolidating itself as a club which can expect to be challenging for automatic promotion from the Championship every year (and from the viewpoint of 5 and certainly 10 years ago, that would seem to be progress), then that seems a more realistic possibility.
As an aside, I'm not sure that I can recall a relegated Reading side bouncing back anything like as strongly as this one has done so far.
by Mr Angry » 02 Feb 2009 10:27
by Schards#2 » 02 Feb 2009 10:30
by Sun Tzu » 02 Feb 2009 10:37
Schards#2 i'm just happily giving my opinions which people are under no obligation to respond to.
.
by Schards#2 » 02 Feb 2009 10:55
Sun TzuSchards#2 i'm just happily giving my opinions which people are under no obligation to respond to.
.
We've already been advised that responses are in fact unwelcome and we're supposed to allow you to issue proclamations without challenge.
You'd be incredibly disappointed if you didn't stir up a bit of flak though !
by Woodcote Royal » 02 Feb 2009 13:27
2 world wars, 1 world cup
With regard to PROGRESS though I'm with Royal Lady..... if we go up then crash back down etc that to me is NOT progress.
Progress = going up, getting some balls and getting a more realistic wage structure allowing decent calibre players in... getting a foothold in the Prem and staying there for a few years. THAT is progress. Another magical lift from the Championship God Coppell is just another flash in the pan.
by Woodcote Royal » 02 Feb 2009 13:48
LUX Schards,
I'd especially take issue with your assessment of the Championship.
How would you think Boro or Blackburn (did you see the highlights of their game yesterday? or even Fulham or West Ham (who are both top half of the Premiership) would do in this League? Not to mention Stoke, Hull, WBA, Adams' Pompey, Newcastle, Sunderland (I watched the NE derby this afternoon and the quality was awful).
Swansea (not even in the playoff positions) outclassed Portsmouth away, Cardiff pushed Arsenal all the way, Burnley have beaten/ pushed all the way half a dozen Premiership clubs this season, including Chelsea, Aresenal, Spurs, WBA............Derby (Derby!!!!!!) beat a fairly full strength Man U in the first leg. Donny could have beaten Villa. OK, these were all Cup games but by definition that's all we've got to go on. Three of the above examples are still unresolved.
by Schards#2 » 02 Feb 2009 14:06
Woodcote Royal2 world wars, 1 world cup
With regard to PROGRESS though I'm with Royal Lady..... if we go up then crash back down etc that to me is NOT progress.
Progress = going up, getting some balls and getting a more realistic wage structure allowing decent calibre players in... getting a foothold in the Prem and staying there for a few years. THAT is progress. Another magical lift from the Championship God Coppell is just another flash in the pan.
Spot on, but this can't happen without the extra revenue that a larger stadium would bring.......................perhaps this observation belongs in another thread...............
by Woodcote Royal » 02 Feb 2009 14:39
Users browsing this forum: WestYorksRoyal and 147 guests