by Ian Royal » 12 Dec 2010 02:33
by under the tin » 12 Dec 2010 08:49
Ian Royal Long needs to be rested to come back fresh & hungry after Xmas. He is a player sigularly incapable of playing well and scoring goals in the first half of the season. His strength and running lead us to play hoof ball.
Get Church in the side with his far superior movement, and knack for nicking a flukie goal even when he isn't able to shoot straight.
And Howard back in the side for some passing quality in the middle. Four of the six times we've scored more than one goal have come whilst he has been involved this season. About 18 of our 28 goals have come whilst he was on the pitch, from about half the games.
by Row Z Royal » 12 Dec 2010 09:11
T.R.O.L.I. Hell, I'd almost rather have Robbo up front at the moment - as clinical as Long but at least he's got the "Savage haircut" to add the comedy angle!
by Ian Royal » 12 Dec 2010 13:30
under the tinIan Royal Long needs to be rested to come back fresh & hungry after Xmas. He is a player sigularly incapable of playing well and scoring goals in the first half of the season. His strength and running lead us to play hoof ball.
Get Church in the side with his far superior movement, and knack for nicking a flukie goal even when he isn't able to shoot straight.
And Howard back in the side for some passing quality in the middle. Four of the six times we've scored more than one goal have come whilst he has been involved this season. About 18 of our 28 goals have come whilst he was on the pitch, from about half the games.
The hoofball thing is a consequence of a midfield devoid of any creativity, and inneffectual wide players.
We didn't have any other options.
I reckon that Brian needs a re-think about playing with 2 luxury wingers every week.
by Ian Royal » 12 Dec 2010 13:36
by cmonurz » 12 Dec 2010 20:17
by leon » 12 Dec 2010 21:54
cmonurz That's 2 from open play in his last 29 or 30 games now. 1 goal from 39 shots on goal this season.
I didn't get to the game, but 2 of the 3 'highlights' BBC showed of the game were Long glancing a header wide from 6 yards, and Long side-footing an effort wide from 6 yards when it was easier to score.
Simply, I'd rather someone else was there to try to put these chances away. Bring Church in for Long, we need to see if Churchy offers more of a goal threat, because it's getting embarassing for Shane.
by Negative_Jeff » 12 Dec 2010 22:06
leoncmonurz That's 2 from open play in his last 29 or 30 games now. 1 goal from 39 shots on goal this season.
I didn't get to the game, but 2 of the 3 'highlights' BBC showed of the game were Long glancing a header wide from 6 yards, and Long side-footing an effort wide from 6 yards when it was easier to score.
Simply, I'd rather someone else was there to try to put these chances away. Bring Church in for Long, we need to see if Churchy offers more of a goal threat, because it's getting embarassing for Shane.
I think you've pretty much summed it up. Church is the more natural footballer - although his hit rate is pretty poor as well, he does at least get into goal scoring positions and score. Yesterday there were a number of occaisons when we crossed the ball from wide and there was no one in the box.
by Platypuss » 13 Dec 2010 09:14
by Tony Le Mesmer » 13 Dec 2010 10:00
Platypuss Just seen the BBC highlights of the game.
just
by Hoop Blah » 13 Dec 2010 10:28
by Wimb » 13 Dec 2010 10:50
by Mr Angry » 13 Dec 2010 11:13
by Hoop Blah » 13 Dec 2010 11:42
Wimb But even teams with established strikers can go through periods without scoring. Look at the last 6 months of 2008/2009 when despite having Doyle, Kitson, Lita, Long (and to a lesser extent NHunt) we still failed to regularly find the net.
I do agree though that Long might benefit from a week on the bench and that it can't possibly hurt to give Church a run out for a week alongside Hunt to see what he can do.
by brendywendy » 13 Dec 2010 11:42
by Hoop Blah » 13 Dec 2010 11:53
brendywendy on sats performances Long>>>.nhunt>>>>>church.
but maybe thats a bit simplistic!
drop em all i say
by brendywendy » 13 Dec 2010 12:02
Hoop Blahbrendywendy on sats performances Long>>>.nhunt>>>>>church.
but maybe thats a bit simplistic!
drop em all i say
To be honest, that's part of the problem, they're all as average as each other and there is no competition for places in this squad because McDermott doesn't seem to want to drop anybody.
Apart from the middle of the park and perhaps centre half the team picks itself, or at least McDermotts selections pick themselves and we all know pretty much what the side will be (not always a bad thing, but when things aren't going well or performances some shuffling of the pack is required).
A few years ago Coppell didn't throw in a young Simon Cox when we needed something new to possibly spark things off. Perhaps Cox wasn't as good a player as the other options upfront or on the right wing, but sometimes you don't need to be. A short term change can just act as a catalyst to get things going.
Do we have that in todays squad? Is it Antonio?
by Hoop Blah » 13 Dec 2010 12:20
by brendywendy » 13 Dec 2010 12:40
The point with Cox is that you just don't have to be 'good enough' sometimes to make a difference.
by Snowball » 13 Dec 2010 13:48
Mr Angry I would say to him "Longy - you need a rest Son" then start with NHunt and Church in a 442.
Long didn't start scoring till after Xmas last season; give him the rest of the month off and bring him back in Jan.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot] and 163 guests