by handbags_harris » 13 Jul 2011 12:17
by Thomas L'Heureux » 13 Jul 2011 12:21
Spud Gun I guess I must be the only one thinking this is a bit of a strange decision. Whilst I realise McAnuff is one of our most experienced players, he has been far from consistent to date. Also, playing as a winger makes it difficult for McAnuff to influence the whole of the team when he is on the pitch. Hopefully wearing the captains armband will bring the best out of him though.
Personally I thought Leigertwood would have been in with a shout for the captaincy purely for the way he leads by example on the pitch.
Has the vice captain been announced yet?
by Duke the Dog » 13 Jul 2011 12:27
by Svlad Cjelli » 13 Jul 2011 12:30
Duke the Dog He'll do. Let's face it the captain's job is fairly inconsequential on the pitch, especially in a first team. It's not as organisational as in, say, cricket is it.
Bit odd that it's a winger though.
by Whore Jackie » 13 Jul 2011 12:32
by Focher » 13 Jul 2011 12:34
handbags_harris Open minded about this. Personally anyone who calls me a c*nt (or whatever he called me) for voicing a (loud) opinion has some way to go to prove himself in my book, but that's no different to our previous incumbent showing a whole stand the finger.
Professionalism - nothing more than I'd expect from any professional footballer.
Consistency - goes missing in games sometimes. Has previously been considered by other club's fans as a player carried by his teammates.
Ability - undoubted ability, but not always shown.
Articulate wisdom - Kitson was articulate, ifnot always wise with what he said or did.
Not only that, he is a winger and wingers tend to be confidence players. You rarely see a winger made captain because of the personality qualities required to be a captain, qualities which rarely manifest themselves in wingers. But if our players respect the decision and think it's the right decision then fair enough. I need convincing that this is right, however, given the other obvious and seemingly better qualified candidates amongst the ranks.
i knew you wouldnt let me down Handbags
But then again, what does my opinion matter?
by Hoop Blah » 13 Jul 2011 12:36
Svlad Cjelli Don't forget that (in theory, at least) the captain is the only one who can talk to the referee.
by dogzbollox » 13 Jul 2011 12:37
Spud Gun I guess I must be the only one thinking this is a bit of a strange decision. Whilst I realise McAnuff is one of our most experienced players, he has been far from consistent to date. Also, playing as a winger makes it difficult for McAnuff to influence the whole of the team when he is on the pitch. Hopefully wearing the captains armband will bring the best out of him though.
Personally I thought Leigertwood would have been in with a shout for the captaincy purely for the way he leads by example on the pitch.
Has the vice captain been announced yet?
by Svlad Cjelli » 13 Jul 2011 12:39
Hoop BlahSvlad Cjelli Don't forget that (in theory, at least) the captain is the only one who can talk to the referee.
What theory is that then? There isn't anything in the laws to that effect is there, or have they changed them?
by M Brook » 13 Jul 2011 12:40
TBM McD - "sign a new deal"
McA - "no"
McD - "i'll make you captain"
McA - "ok"
by The Real Sandhurst Royal » 13 Jul 2011 13:00
by Extended-Phenotype » 13 Jul 2011 13:09
by ZacNaloen » 13 Jul 2011 13:09
by Svlad Cjelli » 13 Jul 2011 13:11
ZacNaloen Shit like this is the reason he is a good choice for captain
"After landing in Graz, Austria Royals had a short bus journey south to Ptuj in Slovenia.
On they piled with players you would expect to be sitting near or next to each other gathered at the back of the bus.
McAnuff climbed onto the coach, saw young winger Jordan Obita on his own and sat down next to him.
He could have just walked on by the 17-year-old to join the rest of his mates, but this was just another example of how McAnuff's actions can so often speak louder than words."
by ZacNaloen » 13 Jul 2011 13:11
by Svlad Cjelli » 13 Jul 2011 13:13
by Hoop Blah » 13 Jul 2011 13:39
Svlad CjelliHoop BlahSvlad Cjelli Don't forget that (in theory, at least) the captain is the only one who can talk to the referee.
What theory is that then? There isn't anything in the laws to that effect is there, or have they changed them?
The Respect Campaign that the clubs and leagues have signed up to.
http://www.thefa.com/RESPECT
As a captain, you have no special status or privileges under the Laws of the Game, but you do have a degree of responsibility for the behaviour of your team.
Even if you are some way away from an incident when the referee feels he/she needs you involved in a discussion with a player, the referee will call you over. This will ensure that, as the team captain, you remain the point of contact for the referee.
by Archie's penalty » 13 Jul 2011 14:12
by Ian Royal » 13 Jul 2011 17:19
by pace=forster » 13 Jul 2011 17:34
handbags_harris Open minded about this. Personally anyone who calls me a c*nt (or whatever he called me) for voicing a (loud) opinion has some way to go to prove himself in my book, but that's no different to our previous incumbent showing a whole stand the finger.
Professionalism - nothing more than I'd expect from any professional footballer.
Consistency - goes missing in games sometimes. Has previously been considered by other club's fans as a player carried by his teammates.
Ability - undoubted ability, but not always shown.
Articulate wisdom - Kitson was articulate, ifnot always wise with what he said or did.
Not only that, he is a winger and wingers tend to be confidence players. You rarely see a winger made captain because of the personality qualities required to be a captain, qualities which rarely manifest themselves in wingers. But if our players respect the decision and think it's the right decision then fair enough. I need convincing that this is right, however, given the other obvious and seemingly better qualified candidates amongst the ranks.
But then again, what does my opinion matter?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 323 guests