by andrew1957 » 25 Mar 2013 11:55
by winchester_royal » 25 Mar 2013 11:58
andrew1957 Assuming the objective was PL survival - every day that goes by this turns into a more and more embarrassing farce.
by andrew1957 » 25 Mar 2013 12:02
winchester_royalandrew1957 Assuming the objective was PL survival - every day that goes by this turns into a more and more embarrassing farce.
Why? Brian wasn't going to keep us up so we sacked him. We tried to get Poyet, he said no, so we move on to our next target. Not sure what else we could have done by now to make survival even more likely.
by melonhead » 25 Mar 2013 12:04
Ian Royalmelonhead :roll:
-i dont remember hearing any abuse.
-what about when X
-but that is tame abuse
I didn't say there hadn't been any. But that is the weakest excuse for abuse I've seen. It might as well be "Brian dear chap, one questions whether you are doing a particularly good job at the moment, have a nice day."
No wonder people complain about our fans being pathetic middle-class plastic losers if you think "You don't know what you're doing" is a good example of a manager being abused.
by Ian Royal » 25 Mar 2013 12:05
andrew1957 Assuming the objective was PL survival - every day that goes by this turns into a more and more embarrassing farce.
Why not just give it to Dolan for the rest of the season - as any other manager will now know that they are third or fourth choice. At least that will buy time and Dolan probably has as good a chance as anyone of keeping us up - be it a VERY slim one.
by loyalroyal4life » 25 Mar 2013 12:10
by sandman » 25 Mar 2013 12:14
Ian Royalandrew1957 Assuming the objective was PL survival - every day that goes by this turns into a more and more embarrassing farce.
Why not just give it to Dolan for the rest of the season - as any other manager will now know that they are third or fourth choice. At least that will buy time and Dolan probably has as good a chance as anyone of keeping us up - be it a VERY slim one.
Which most people realise it wasn't.
Dolan has said he doesn't want it. I reckon he could be persuaded if necessary, but only after we've gone through the process of going external and that failing.
by Hoop Blah » 25 Mar 2013 12:17
by winchester_royal » 25 Mar 2013 12:21
andrew1957winchester_royalandrew1957 Assuming the objective was PL survival - every day that goes by this turns into a more and more embarrassing farce.
Why? Brian wasn't going to keep us up so we sacked him. We tried to get Poyet, he said no, so we move on to our next target. Not sure what else we could have done by now to make survival even more likely.
Why on earth would any club sack a manager with 9 games to go unless they had a viable successor ready to take over. Wolves did the same last year and that went well. We had a better - be it very slim - chance of staying up by keeping faith with Brian.
by Hoop Blah » 25 Mar 2013 12:22
andrew1957 Why on earth would any club sack a manager with 9 games to go unless they had a viable successor ready to take over.
andrew1957 Wolves did the same last year and that went well. We had a better - be it very slim - chance of staying up by keeping faith with Brian.
by Esteban » 25 Mar 2013 12:28
by leon » 25 Mar 2013 12:39
by Wycombe Royal » 25 Mar 2013 12:45
leon Despite how anyone dresses it up it's an absolute shambles.
by Wycombe Royal » 25 Mar 2013 12:47
andrew1957winchester_royalandrew1957 Assuming the objective was PL survival - every day that goes by this turns into a more and more embarrassing farce.
Why? Brian wasn't going to keep us up so we sacked him. We tried to get Poyet, he said no, so we move on to our next target. Not sure what else we could have done by now to make survival even more likely.
Why on earth would any club sack a manager with 9 games to go unless they had a viable successor ready to take over. Wolves did the same last year and that went well. We had a better - be it very slim - chance of staying up by keeping faith with Brian.
by paultheroyal » 25 Mar 2013 12:47
Wycombe Royalleon Despite how anyone dresses it up it's an absolute shambles.
How exacrtly? What have the club done wrong so far in their search for a manager?
by sandman » 25 Mar 2013 12:50
Wycombe Royalleon Despite how anyone dresses it up it's an absolute shambles.
How exacrtly? What have the club done wrong so far in their search for a manager?
by Cobi » 25 Mar 2013 12:50
paultheroyalWycombe Royalleon Despite how anyone dresses it up it's an absolute shambles.
How exacrtly? What have the club done wrong so far in their search for a manager?
Not convince a number of targets that we are the best option for starters!
by Hoop Blah » 25 Mar 2013 12:51
by Hoop Blah » 25 Mar 2013 12:55
sandman What have they done right?
by PistolPete » 25 Mar 2013 13:05
Hoop Blahsandman What have they done right?
They've removed a manager they didn't think could do the job they wanted him to do after giving him ample opportunity to make a success of the job he started with promotion.
They didn't just throw him out at Christmas but showed him loyalty worthy of the man, a loyalty that most other clubs probably wouldn't have afforded him.
Quietly drawn up their shortlist of prospective managers and started talking to them about the job, potentially offering it to one candidate who may have turned it down.
They're taking their time trying to find the right person all without turning it into a media circus under pressure from a soundbite generation of fans dying for the latest bit of irrelevant 'breaking news' from Sky Sports News.
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], rabidbee and 128 guests