by floyd__streete » 12 Jan 2012 14:40
by Hoop Blah » 12 Jan 2012 14:42
by floyd__streete » 12 Jan 2012 14:43
Hoop Blah I think Sheppard is a jump up in potential class from Baseya. He has at least scored a goal in the last few years!
by Terminal Boardom » 12 Jan 2012 14:50
by Libertine » 12 Jan 2012 14:54
by Extended-Phenotype » 12 Jan 2012 14:55
by who are ya? » 12 Jan 2012 14:55
Libertine Any chances of a signing where we can expect an immediate contribution be made to the first team.
by Svlad Cjelli » 12 Jan 2012 14:58
Extended-Phenotype But how has cheap transfer activity on unknowns been a major factor in our ‘success’?
Current team:
Feds: Non-contract youth
Cummings: Managers previous academy
Gorks: Proven
Pearce: Academy
Harte: Proven
Jobi: Bigger money
Legs: Proven, bigger money
Karacan: Academy
ALF: As yet unsuccessful
Church: Academy
Where are these anonymous players we’ve “bought cheap” and turned into superstars? That's my point. It's just a myth.
by floyd__streete » 12 Jan 2012 15:01
Libertine We sit 5th in the table tho. Any chances of a signing where we can expect an immediate contribution be made to the first team.
by Svlad Cjelli » 12 Jan 2012 15:02
floyd__streeteLibertine We sit 5th in the table tho. Any chances of a signing where we can expect an immediate contribution be made to the first team.
Be careful posing that kind of very reasonable question on this board. You'll be accused of causing 'incitement to financial meltdown' by the usual rabid suspects on here.
It's also 12th January - 19 days to go yet before everything's done and dusted.
by FiNeRaIn » 12 Jan 2012 15:03
Svlad Cjelli Reading has consistently used their limited resources in the most efficient way possible, and far more better than competing clubs have.
by facaldaqui » 12 Jan 2012 15:04
Extended-Phenotype Why are proven players always likely to flounder?
Or is that the only way people can justify the 'Buying Sh/t and see what happens' strategy?
by winchester_royal » 12 Jan 2012 15:05
Extended-Phenotype But how has cheap transfer activity on unknowns been a major factor in our ‘success’?
Current team:
Feds: Non-contract youth
Cummings: Managers previous academy
Gorks: Proven
Pearce: Academy
Harte: Proven
Jobi: Bigger money
Legs: Proven, bigger money
Karacan: Academy
ALF: As yet unsuccessful
Church: Academy
Where are these anonymous players we’ve “bought cheap” and turned into superstars? That's my point. It's just a myth.
by Ian Royal » 12 Jan 2012 15:07
bigmike The same muppets on here moaning about this signing were the ones moaning about Doyle when he signed..
Good on ya nice to see that you dont change..
Good luck to Sheppard Only has to score 4 goals this season and hes better than Simon Church was last season
by FiNeRaIn » 12 Jan 2012 15:07
winchester_royalExtended-Phenotype But how has cheap transfer activity on unknowns been a major factor in our ‘success’?
Current team:
Feds: Non-contract youth
Cummings: Managers previous academy
Gorks: Proven
Pearce: Academy
Harte: Proven
Jobi: Bigger money
Legs: Proven, bigger money
Karacan: Academy
ALF: As yet unsuccessful
Church: Academy
Where are these anonymous players we’ve “bought cheap” and turned into superstars? That's my point. It's just a myth.
Lets have a look at the 05/06 team instead:
Hahnemann: Cheap, relatively unproven in english game
Murts: Big money, fair enough
Ingi: Proven, but not expensive
Sonko: Cheap, unproven
Shorey: Cheap, unproven
Little: Free transfer
Harps and Sids: Were both young, not proven at this level, and relatively cheap
Convey: Expensive, but not proven
Doyle: Cheap, unproven at this level
Kitson: Not expensive, unproven at this level
Then we had the likes of Oster, Hunt, and Long all of whom were cheap and unproven at this level.
I'd say thats at least 80% of the core squad who were cheap, unproven, or both
by Svlad Cjelli » 12 Jan 2012 15:08
FiNeRaInSvlad Cjelli Reading has consistently used their limited resources in the most efficient way possible, and far more better than competing clubs have.
Our resources are FAR greater than many of our competitors, yet we spend significantly less. There is nothing limited in receiving over 40 million in transfers since relegation from the prem. Thats amongst the highest in the UK.
by Wimb » 12 Jan 2012 15:09
by FiNeRaIn » 12 Jan 2012 15:09
by Libertine » 12 Jan 2012 15:10
floyd__streeteLibertine We sit 5th in the table tho. Any chances of a signing where we can expect an immediate contribution be made to the first team.
Be careful posing that kind of very reasonable question on this board. You'll be accused of causing 'incitement to financial meltdown' by the usual rabid suspects on here.
by who are ya? » 12 Jan 2012 15:10
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 222 guests