Pepe the Horsemanpaultheroyal Calling Muskrat to the thread calling Muskrat to the thread.
He was still right because one of our goals was a deflection and Sheff Wed had lots of shots and a couple of players missing.

by genome » 11 Dec 2016 21:13
Pepe the Horsemanpaultheroyal Calling Muskrat to the thread calling Muskrat to the thread.
He was still right because one of our goals was a deflection and Sheff Wed had lots of shots and a couple of players missing.
by Muskrat » 12 Dec 2016 09:12
leonPepe the Horsemanpaultheroyal Calling Muskrat to the thread calling Muskrat to the thread.
He was still right because one of our goals was a deflection and Sheff Wed had lots of shots and a couple of players missing.
Are you Nick Ames in today's Observer? That was basically his article.
by leon » 12 Dec 2016 09:43
MuskratleonPepe the Horseman He was still right because one of our goals was a deflection and Sheff Wed had lots of shots and a couple of players missing.
Are you Nick Ames in today's Observer? That was basically his article.
Thanks for pointing it out but you seem to have inadvertently forgotten to post a link to the article.
https://www.theguardian.com/football/2016/dec/10/reading-sheffield-wednesday-championship-match-report
by muirinho » 12 Dec 2016 10:41
leonMuskratleon
Are you Nick Ames in today's Observer? That was basically his article.
Thanks for pointing it out but you seem to have inadvertently forgotten to post a link to the article.
https://www.theguardian.com/football/2016/dec/10/reading-sheffield-wednesday-championship-match-report
![]()
I wasn't referring to you.
by BR0B0T » 12 Dec 2016 10:44
MuskratleonPepe the Horseman He was still right because one of our goals was a deflection and Sheff Wed had lots of shots and a couple of players missing.
Are you Nick Ames in today's Observer? That was basically his article.
Thanks for pointing it out but you seem to have inadvertently forgotten to post a link to the article.
https://www.theguardian.com/football/2016/dec/10/reading-sheffield-wednesday-championship-match-report
^^^ a Reading side whose third place in the division appeared a trick of the light,
by leon » 12 Dec 2016 10:47
BR0B0TMuskratleon
Are you Nick Ames in today's Observer? That was basically his article.
Thanks for pointing it out but you seem to have inadvertently forgotten to post a link to the article.
https://www.theguardian.com/football/2016/dec/10/reading-sheffield-wednesday-championship-match-report^^^ a Reading side whose third place in the division appeared a trick of the light,
i.e. false third
by Muskrat » 12 Dec 2016 13:43
leonMuskratleon
Are you Nick Ames in today's Observer? That was basically his article.
Thanks for pointing it out but you seem to have inadvertently forgotten to post a link to the article.
https://www.theguardian.com/football/2016/dec/10/reading-sheffield-wednesday-championship-match-report
![]()
I wasn't referring to you.
by Silver Fox » 17 Dec 2016 17:48
by Nameless » 17 Dec 2016 17:53
by genome » 17 Dec 2016 17:55
by Snowball » 17 Dec 2016 18:15
by Jagermesiter1871 » 17 Dec 2016 18:25
by Silver Fox » 17 Dec 2016 18:29
Snowball We give away FAR too many chances to be a top six team.
by Nameless » 17 Dec 2016 18:35
by royalp-we » 17 Dec 2016 19:01
by Ian Royal » 17 Dec 2016 19:05
Silver FoxSnowball We give away FAR too many chances to be a top six team.
![]()
Last time I looked unconverted chances didn't affect our league position, which is why we are in fact a top six team, third no less!!!!
by From Despair To Where? » 17 Dec 2016 19:35
by AthleticoSpizz » 17 Dec 2016 19:49
by From Despair To Where? » 17 Dec 2016 21:08
by AthleticoSpizz » 17 Dec 2016 21:15
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 291 guests